Analytical Chemistry Group, Department of Plant and Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Anal Chem. 2021 Jun 22;93(24):8432-8441. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c00357. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
Matrix effects are well-known challenges for accurate and comparable measurements with liquid chromatography (LC) electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). This study describes a three-step method to evaluate and compensate for matrix effects in enriched wastewater extracts using LC ESI-high-resolution MS (HRMS). As a first step, the "dilute and shoot" approach was used to determine the optimal relative enrichment factor (REF) for a direct comparison between wastewater influent (REF 10) and effluent (REF 50) extracts. However, the rapid decrease in the number of non-target compounds detected with increasing dilution leads to the need for a correction of the matrix effect for analyzing samples with higher REFs. As a second step, the observed matrix effect at higher REFs was corrected by the retention time-dependent matrix effect. A new scaling (TiChri scale) of the matrix effect was introduced, which demonstrates that the total ion chromatogram (TIC) predicts the matrix effect as effectively as post-column infusion (PCI) approaches; thus, the average median matrix effect was improved from -65 to 1% for influent (REF 100) and from -46 to -2% for effluent extracts (REF 250). The TIC traces for concentrated (REF 250) influent and effluent samples were successfully used to correct the matrix effects and allowed the extent of micropollutant degradation in three WWTPs to be quantified. As a final step, the residual structure-specific matrix effect was predicted and corrected by quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPR), which led to a further correction of the matrix effect to 0 ± 7% for 65 compounds.
基质效应是液相色谱(LC)电喷雾电离质谱(ESI-MS)进行准确和可比测量的众所周知的挑战。本研究描述了一种三步法,用于使用 LC ESI-高分辨率 MS(HRMS)评估和补偿富废水提取物中的基质效应。作为第一步,使用“稀释和注射”方法确定直接比较废水进水(REF10)和出水(REF50)提取物的最佳相对富集因子(REF)。然而,随着稀释倍数的增加,检测到的非目标化合物数量迅速减少,因此需要对更高 REF 样品的基质效应进行校正。作为第二步,通过保留时间相关的基质效应校正更高 REF 时观察到的基质效应。引入了一种新的基质效应缩放(TiChri 比例),表明总离子色谱(TIC)有效地预测了基质效应,如柱后注入(PCI)方法;因此,进水(REF100)的平均中位数基质效应从-65%提高到 1%,出水提取物(REF250)的平均中位数基质效应从-46%提高到-2%。浓缩(REF250)进水和出水样品的 TIC 迹线成功地用于校正基质效应,并允许定量三个 WWTP 中微量污染物的降解程度。作为最后一步,通过定量结构-性质关系(QSPR)预测和校正残留的结构特异性基质效应,将基质效应进一步校正至 65 种化合物的 0±7%。