Newman S C, Bland R C, Orn H
Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Compr Psychiatry. 1988 Jul-Aug;29(4):402-8. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(88)90021-1.
The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) has been criticized for failing to detect individuals with chronic symptoms due to its focus on recent changes in one's usual state. Using data from a community survey in Edmonton, Canada, in which 3,258 subjects completed the 30-item GHQ and the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS), the traditional method of scoring the GHQ was compared to a revised method proposed by Goodchild and Duncan-Jones. A case was defined to be someone with a history in the preceding month of one or more of the following DIS/DSM-III disorders: major depressive episode, phobia, panic disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder. A receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated no difference in the two methods of scoring the GHQ.
一般健康问卷(GHQ)因专注于个体通常状态的近期变化而未能检测出有慢性症状的个体,因此受到批评。利用加拿大埃德蒙顿一项社区调查的数据,其中3258名受试者完成了30项的GHQ和诊断访谈表(DIS),将传统的GHQ计分方法与古德柴尔德和邓肯 - 琼斯提出的修订方法进行了比较。病例定义为在前一个月内有以下一种或多种DIS/DSM - III障碍病史的人:重度抑郁发作、恐惧症、惊恐障碍和强迫症。受试者工作特征分析表明,两种GHQ计分方法没有差异。