Cairns E, Wilson R, McClelland R, Gillespie K
University of Ulster, Coleraine, N. Ireland.
J Clin Psychol. 1989 Sep;45(5):793-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198909)45:5<793::aid-jclp2270450516>3.0.co;2-u.
To replicate the finding by Goodchild and Duncan-Jones (1985), that rescoring the GHQ30 in order to take account of chronicity would improve its validity, a random sample of 244 people completed the GHQ. Of these 102 also took part in a second interview in which they were administered the PSE. There was no evidence that the new scoring scheme improved correlations between the GHQ and other measures of morbidity nor did this improve its sensitivity or specificity when validated agaist the PSE.
为了重现古德柴尔德和邓肯 - 琼斯(1985年)的研究结果,即重新对一般健康问卷(GHQ30)进行评分以考虑慢性病情况会提高其效度,随机抽取了244人完成了GHQ问卷。其中102人还参与了第二次访谈,期间接受了人格评定量表(PSE)测试。没有证据表明新的评分方案提高了GHQ与其他发病率指标之间的相关性,在与PSE进行效度验证时,也没有提高其敏感性或特异性。