• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外物理振动碎石术经坐骨大切迹治疗远端输尿管结石。

Use of Extracorporeal Physical Vibration Lithecbole Through Greater Sciatic Foramen for Treatment of Distal Ureteral Calculi.

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2022 Jan;36(1):143-150. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0048.

DOI:10.1089/end.2021.0048
PMID:34098728
Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of performing extracorporeal physical vibrational lithecbole (EPVL) through greater sciatic foramen (GSF) for distal ureteral calculi (DUC) treatment. All patients with a diagnosis of DUC (6-10 mm in diameter) were enrolled in this study from October 2018 to May 2020. Patients were randomly divided into three groups receiving EPVL through GSF (Group A,  = 58), or abdominal (Group B,  = 60), or combined with oral use of tamsulosin at 0.4 mg daily (Group C,  = 63). There was no significant difference observed in terms of demographic characteristics or size of stones among the three groups ( > 0.05). Compared with the Groups B and C, patients of the Group A displayed a significantly higher score of comfort, with a significantly decreased number of renal colic attacks or analgesics required ( < 0.01). The stone-free rate also significantly increased after 1 and 2 weeks of treatment ( < 0.01), despite such a significant difference among these groups vanishing after 4 weeks of treatment. EPVL in the prone position uses the GSF as the path and is a safe and effective approach to treat the distal ureteral calculi.

摘要

评估经大坐骨切迹(GSF)行体外物理振动碎石术(EPVL)治疗远端输尿管结石(DUC)的疗效和安全性。

所有被诊断为 DUC(直径 6-10mm)的患者均于 2018 年 10 月至 2020 年 5 月期间被纳入本研究。患者被随机分为三组,分别接受经 GSF(A 组, = 58)、腹部(B 组, = 60)或联合每日口服坦索罗辛 0.4mg(C 组, = 63)行 EPVL 治疗。三组患者的人口统计学特征或结石大小均无显著差异( > 0.05)。与 B 组和 C 组相比,A 组患者舒适度评分显著更高,肾绞痛发作次数或所需止痛药的数量显著减少( < 0.01)。治疗 1 周和 2 周后,结石清除率也显著增加( < 0.01),尽管治疗 4 周后,这些组之间的差异消失。

俯卧位 EPVL 采用 GSF 作为路径,是一种安全有效的治疗远端输尿管结石的方法。

相似文献

1
Use of Extracorporeal Physical Vibration Lithecbole Through Greater Sciatic Foramen for Treatment of Distal Ureteral Calculi.体外物理振动碎石术经坐骨大切迹治疗远端输尿管结石。
J Endourol. 2022 Jan;36(1):143-150. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0048.
2
Treatment of Distal Ureteral Calculi Using Extracorporeal Physical Vibrational Lithecbole Combined with Tamsulosin: A New Option to Speed Up Obstruction Relief.体外物理振动式输尿管镜联合坦索罗辛治疗远端输尿管结石:加速梗阻缓解的新选择
J Endourol. 2018 Feb;32(2):161-167. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0560. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
3
[Clinical study on the treatment of calculous renal colic through external physical vibration lithecbole under different position].[不同体位下体外物理振动排石治疗结石性肾绞痛的临床研究]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Aug 25;100(32):2494-2497. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20191216-02742.
4
External physical vibration lithecbole facilitating the expulsion of upper ureteric stones 1.0-2.0 cm after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial.体外物理振动松解辅助体外冲击波碎石术后排净输尿管上段 1.0-2.0cm 结石:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Urolithiasis. 2020 Feb;48(1):71-77. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1100-8. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
5
Efficacy and Safety of External Physical Vibration Lithecbole After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy or Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Urinary Stone: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.体外冲击波碎石术或逆行肾内手术后体外物理振动碎石术治疗尿路结石的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endourol. 2021 May;35(5):712-720. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0820. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
6
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as first line treatment for urinary tract stones in children: outcome of 500 cases.体外冲击波碎石术作为儿童尿路结石的一线治疗方法:500 例病例的结果。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2012 Jun;44(3):661-6. doi: 10.1007/s11255-012-0133-0. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
7
How to accelerate the upper urinary stone discharge after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for < 15 mm upper urinary stones: a prospective multi-center randomized controlled trial about external physical vibration lithecbole (EPVL).如何加速体外冲击波碎石术 (ESWL) 后 < 15mm 上尿路结石的排石:一项关于体外物理振动碎石术 (EPVL) 的前瞻性多中心随机对照试验。
World J Urol. 2018 Feb;36(2):293-298. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2123-4. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
8
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy of External Physical Vibration Lithecbole after Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for a Lower Pole Renal Stone Less Than 2 cm.一项体外冲击波碎石术后应用体外物理振动排石治疗下盏肾结石<2cm 的前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Urol. 2016 Apr;195(4 Pt 1):965-70. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.174. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
9
Comparison of tamsulosin with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in treating distal ureteral stones.坦索罗辛与体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管下段结石的比较。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Apr 5;122(7):798-801.
10
Efficacy of tamsulosin versus tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy on stone expulsion in patients with distal ureteral stones: A randomized double-blind clinical trial.坦索罗辛与他达拉非作为排石疗法治疗输尿管下段结石患者排石效果的比较:一项随机、双盲的临床试验。
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Sep-Oct;47(5):982-988. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.1007.