• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外物理振动松解辅助体外冲击波碎石术后排净输尿管上段 1.0-2.0cm 结石:一项前瞻性随机试验。

External physical vibration lithecbole facilitating the expulsion of upper ureteric stones 1.0-2.0 cm after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211100, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Urolithiasis. 2020 Feb;48(1):71-77. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1100-8. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

DOI:10.1007/s00240-018-1100-8
PMID:30488093
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6989669/
Abstract

To observe the efficacy and safety of External Physical Vibration Lithecbole (EPVL) in patients with upper ureteric stones 1.0-2.0 cm after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). A total of 271 patients with upper ureteric stones 1.0-2.0 cm were prospectively randomized into two groups. One hundred and twenty-seven cases in the treatment group accepted EPVL therapy and 144 cases as control after ESWL. The stone expulsion status and stone-free rates (SFRs) between two groups were compared at the 1st, 2nd and 4th weekends by imaging examinations. All of 271 patients were randomly assigned to two groups, of which 127 patients were included in the treatment group and 144 in the control group. EPVL was successful in assisting the discharge of stone fragments. The rate of stone expulsion at day 1 in the treatment group was significantly higher than in the control group (79.5% vs. 64.6%, P = 0.006). The SFRs of the 1st weekend (76.3% vs. 61.8%, P = 0.010), the 2nd weekend (88.2% vs. 77.1%, P = 0.017) and the 4th weekend (92.1% vs. 84.0%, P = 0.042) in the treatment group were all significantly higher than that in the control group. However, no statistical significance was found in complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Furthermore, in the treatment group the patients were treated a mean 4.3 sessions of EPVL. EPVL and ESWL are ideal complementary partners in the treatment of upper ureteric stones 1.0-2.0 cm, satisfying both high SFR and low complication. This method is safe and reproducible in clinical practice, and it also needs large-scale multicenter prospective studies further to prove the above conclusions.

摘要

观察体外物理振动碎石术(EPVL)对体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)后 1.0-2.0cm 输尿管上段结石的疗效和安全性。将 271 例 1.0-2.0cm 输尿管上段结石患者前瞻性随机分为两组。治疗组 127 例接受 EPVL 治疗,ESWL 后对照组 144 例。通过影像学检查比较两组第 1、2、4 周末结石排出情况及结石清除率(SFR)。271 例患者均随机分为两组,其中治疗组 127 例,对照组 144 例。EPVL 成功辅助结石排出。治疗组第 1 天结石排出率明显高于对照组(79.5%比 64.6%,P=0.006)。第 1 周末(76.3%比 61.8%,P=0.010)、第 2 周末(88.2%比 77.1%,P=0.017)及第 4 周末(92.1%比 84.0%,P=0.042)的 SFR 治疗组均明显高于对照组。但两组并发症比较无统计学意义(P>0.05)。此外,治疗组患者平均接受 EPVL 治疗 4.3 次。EPVL 和 ESWL 是治疗 1.0-2.0cm 输尿管上段结石的理想互补伙伴,既能达到较高的 SFR,又能降低并发症。该方法在临床实践中安全且可重复,需要进一步进行大规模多中心前瞻性研究来证明上述结论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b87/6989669/92ee61e34aa6/240_2018_1100_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b87/6989669/1eb4baae4603/240_2018_1100_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b87/6989669/92ee61e34aa6/240_2018_1100_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b87/6989669/1eb4baae4603/240_2018_1100_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b87/6989669/92ee61e34aa6/240_2018_1100_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
External physical vibration lithecbole facilitating the expulsion of upper ureteric stones 1.0-2.0 cm after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial.体外物理振动松解辅助体外冲击波碎石术后排净输尿管上段 1.0-2.0cm 结石:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Urolithiasis. 2020 Feb;48(1):71-77. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1100-8. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
2
How to accelerate the upper urinary stone discharge after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for < 15 mm upper urinary stones: a prospective multi-center randomized controlled trial about external physical vibration lithecbole (EPVL).如何加速体外冲击波碎石术 (ESWL) 后 < 15mm 上尿路结石的排石:一项关于体外物理振动碎石术 (EPVL) 的前瞻性多中心随机对照试验。
World J Urol. 2018 Feb;36(2):293-298. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2123-4. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
3
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy of External Physical Vibration Lithecbole after Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for a Lower Pole Renal Stone Less Than 2 cm.一项体外冲击波碎石术后应用体外物理振动排石治疗下盏肾结石<2cm 的前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Urol. 2016 Apr;195(4 Pt 1):965-70. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.174. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
4
Effect of the External Physical Vibration Lithecbole on the Discharge of Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.外部物理振动碎石术对上尿路结石排出的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Urol J. 2021 Feb 24;18(1):19-27. doi: 10.22037/uj.v18i.6417.
5
Effect of external physical vibration lithecbole in obese patients with lower pole stones <15 mm after ESWL: a single-centre, randomized, open label clinical trial.体外物理振动碎石术对体外冲击波碎石术后下极结石<15毫米的肥胖患者的影响:一项单中心、随机、开放标签的临床试验
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 30;10:1101811. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1101811. eCollection 2023.
6
Efficacy and Safety of External Physical Vibration Lithecbole After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy or Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Urinary Stone: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.体外冲击波碎石术或逆行肾内手术后体外物理振动碎石术治疗尿路结石的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endourol. 2021 May;35(5):712-720. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0820. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
7
When is the best time to perform external physical vibration lithecbole (EPVL) after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): a multi-center study based on randomized controlled trials.逆行性肾内手术(RIRS)后行体外物理振动碎石术(EPVL)的最佳时间是什么时候:一项基于随机对照试验的多中心研究。
Urolithiasis. 2020 Dec;48(6):533-539. doi: 10.1007/s00240-019-01175-5. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
8
Is physical therapy effective following extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review.体外冲击波碎石术和逆行肾内手术治疗后物理治疗是否有效:荟萃分析和系统评价。
BMC Urol. 2020 Jul 9;20(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00664-9.
9
External Physical Vibration Lithecbole Promotes the Clearance of Upper Urinary Stones after Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.体外物理振动排石促进逆行肾内手术后上尿路结石的清除:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机对照试验。
J Urol. 2017 May;197(5):1289-1295. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
10
Treatment of Distal Ureteral Calculi Using Extracorporeal Physical Vibrational Lithecbole Combined with Tamsulosin: A New Option to Speed Up Obstruction Relief.体外物理振动式输尿管镜联合坦索罗辛治疗远端输尿管结石:加速梗阻缓解的新选择
J Endourol. 2018 Feb;32(2):161-167. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0560. Epub 2018 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-access mini-PCNL with flexible cystoscopy vs. multi-access mini-PCNL for complex renal stones in prospective study.前瞻性研究中,单通道微创经皮肾镜取石术联合软性膀胱镜与多通道微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗复杂性肾结石的比较
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 20;15(1):30523. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15887-9.
2
RIRS with flexible vacuum-assisted UAS versus MPCNL for impacted upper ureteral stones: a prospective, randomized controlled study.软性真空辅助输尿管镜下逆行肾盂内手术(RIRS)与微创经皮肾镜取石术(MPCNL)治疗上段输尿管嵌顿性结石的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Urolithiasis. 2025 Jun 4;53(1):105. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01781-6.
3
Electroacupuncture combined with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is beneficial for the expulsion of ureteral calculi: a prospective randomized trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy analysis of self-help position therapy after holmium laser lithotripsy via flexible ureteroscopy.输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术后自助体位疗法的疗效分析
BMC Urol. 2018 May 8;18(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0348-1.
2
How to accelerate the upper urinary stone discharge after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for < 15 mm upper urinary stones: a prospective multi-center randomized controlled trial about external physical vibration lithecbole (EPVL).如何加速体外冲击波碎石术 (ESWL) 后 < 15mm 上尿路结石的排石:一项关于体外物理振动碎石术 (EPVL) 的前瞻性多中心随机对照试验。
World J Urol. 2018 Feb;36(2):293-298. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2123-4. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
3
电针结合体外冲击波碎石术有利于输尿管结石的排出:一项前瞻性随机试验。
World J Urol. 2024 Sep 9;42(1):512. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05226-4.
4
SLAP Trial: Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Mechanical Percussion Therapy Post ESWL for Renal Calculi.SLAP试验:体外冲击波碎石术后冲击波碎石术与机械冲击疗法治疗肾结石
Adv Urol. 2024 Mar 26;2024:7870425. doi: 10.1155/2024/7870425. eCollection 2024.
5
RIRS with FV-UAS vs. MPCNL for 2-3-cm upper urinary tract stones: a prospective study.硬镜联合钬激光碎石术与微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗 2-3cm 上尿路结石:一项前瞻性研究。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Feb 10;52(1):31. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01539-6.
6
Therapeutic effects of flexible ureteroscopy alone and in combination with external physical vibration on upper urinary tract calculi: a randomized controlled trial.输尿管软镜单独及联合体外物理振动治疗上尿路结石的疗效:一项随机对照试验
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2021 Sep;16(3):536-542. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.106425. Epub 2021 May 25.
7
Is physical therapy effective following extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review.体外冲击波碎石术和逆行肾内手术治疗后物理治疗是否有效:荟萃分析和系统评价。
BMC Urol. 2020 Jul 9;20(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00664-9.
External Physical Vibration Lithecbole Promotes the Clearance of Upper Urinary Stones after Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.
体外物理振动排石促进逆行肾内手术后上尿路结石的清除:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机对照试验。
J Urol. 2017 May;197(5):1289-1295. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
4
A new optical coupling control technique and application in SWL.一种新的光学耦合控制技术及其在冲击波碎石术中的应用。
Urolithiasis. 2016 Nov;44(6):539-544. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0874-9. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
5
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy of External Physical Vibration Lithecbole after Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for a Lower Pole Renal Stone Less Than 2 cm.一项体外冲击波碎石术后应用体外物理振动排石治疗下盏肾结石<2cm 的前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Urol. 2016 Apr;195(4 Pt 1):965-70. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.174. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
6
Re: percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Eur Urol. 2015 Oct;68(4):740-1. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.036.
7
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of renal and ureteral stones.体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾和输尿管结石。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2015 Jan-Feb;61(1):65-71. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.61.01.065. Epub 2015 Jan 1.
8
Comparison between retrograde intrarenal surgery and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole kidney stones up to 15 mm. Prospective, randomized study.逆行性肾内手术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗直径达15毫米的下极肾结石的比较。前瞻性随机研究。
Actas Urol Esp. 2015 May;39(4):236-42. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
9
Clinically insignificant residual fragments after flexible ureterorenoscopy: medium-term follow-up results.软性输尿管肾镜检查术后临床意义不显著的残留碎片:中期随访结果
Urolithiasis. 2014 Dec;42(6):533-8. doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0691-y. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
10
In vitro comparison of prototype magnetic tool with conventional nitinol basket for ureteroscopic retrieval of stone fragments rendered paramagnetic with iron oxide microparticles.体外比较原型磁性工具与传统的镍钛诺篮用于输尿管镜取石术取回的磁化氧化铁微颗粒的结石碎片。
J Urol. 2012 Aug;188(2):648-52. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.03.118. Epub 2012 Jun 15.