• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项3期、开放标签、对照、随机、多中心试验,评估StrataGraft®构建物在深二度热烧伤患者中的疗效和安全性。

A phase 3, open-label, controlled, randomized, multicenter trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of StrataGraft® construct in patients with deep partial-thickness thermal burns.

作者信息

Gibson Angela L F, Holmes James H, Shupp Jeffrey W, Smith David, Joe Victor, Carson Joshua, Litt Jeffrey, Kahn Steven, Short Tracee, Cancio Leopoldo, Rizzo Julie, Carter Jeffrey E, Foster Kevin, Lokuta Mary A, Comer Allen R, Smiell Janice M, Allen-Hoffmann B Lynn

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792, United States.

Department of Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, United States.

出版信息

Burns. 2021 Aug;47(5):1024-1037. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.04.021. Epub 2021 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2021.04.021
PMID:34099322
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This phase 3 study evaluated StrataGraft construct as a donor-site sparing alternative to autograft in patients with deep partial-thickness (DPT) burns.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥18 years with 3-49% total body surface area (TBSA) thermal burns were enrolled. In each patient, 2 DPT areas (≤2000cm total) of comparable depth after excision were randomized to either cryopreserved StrataGraft or autograft. Coprimary endpoints were: the difference in percent area of StrataGraft treatment site and autograft treatment site autografted at Month 3 (M3), and the proportion of patients achieving durable wound closure of the StrataGraft site without autograft at M3. Safety assessments were performed in all patients. Efficacy and safety follow-up continued to 1 year.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients were enrolled. By M3, there was a 96% reduction in mean percent area of StrataGraft treatment sites that required autografting, compared with autograft treatment sites (4.3% vs 102.1%, respectively; P<.0001). StrataGraft treatment resulted in durable wound closure at M3 without autografting in 92% (95% CI: 85.6, 98.8; n/n 59/64) of patients for whom data were available. The most common StrataGraft-related adverse event was pruritus (15%).

CONCLUSIONS

Both coprimary endpoints were achieved. StrataGraft may offer a new treatment for DPT burns to reduce the need for autografting.

CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER

NCT03005106.

摘要

目的

本3期研究评估了StrataGraft构建物作为深部部分厚度(DPT)烧伤患者自体移植供区保留替代物的效果。

方法

纳入年龄≥18岁、总体表面积(TBSA)为3%-49%的热烧伤患者。在每位患者中,将切除后深度相当的2个DPT区域(总面积≤2000cm)随机分配至冷冻保存的StrataGraft或自体移植组。共同主要终点为:第3个月(M3)时StrataGraft治疗部位和自体移植治疗部位自体移植面积百分比的差异,以及M3时StrataGraft部位在未进行自体移植情况下实现持久伤口闭合的患者比例。对所有患者进行安全性评估。疗效和安全性随访持续至1年。

结果

共纳入71例患者。到M3时,与自体移植治疗部位相比,StrataGraft治疗部位需要自体移植的平均面积百分比降低了96%(分别为4.3%和102.1%;P<0.0001)。对于有可用数据的患者,StrataGraft治疗在M3时未进行自体移植的情况下实现了92%(95%CI:85.6,98.8;n/n 59/64)的持久伤口闭合。最常见的与StrataGraft相关的不良事件是瘙痒(15%)。

结论

两个共同主要终点均达成。StrataGraft可能为DPT烧伤提供一种新的治疗方法,以减少自体移植的需求。

临床试验标识符

NCT03005106。

相似文献

1
A phase 3, open-label, controlled, randomized, multicenter trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of StrataGraft® construct in patients with deep partial-thickness thermal burns.一项3期、开放标签、对照、随机、多中心试验,评估StrataGraft®构建物在深二度热烧伤患者中的疗效和安全性。
Burns. 2021 Aug;47(5):1024-1037. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.04.021. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
2
An open-label, prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter, phase 1b study of StrataGraft skin tissue versus autografting in patients with deep partial-thickness thermal burns.一项关于 StrataGraft 皮肤组织与自体移植治疗深度部分厚度热烧伤患者的开放性、前瞻性、随机、对照、多中心、1b 期研究。
Burns. 2019 Dec;45(8):1749-1758. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.07.021. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
3
Pooled safety analysis of STRATA2011 and STRATA2016 clinical trials evaluating the use of StrataGraft® in patients with deep partial-thickness thermal burns.STRATA2011 和 STRATA2016 临床试验的汇总安全性分析,评估 StrataGraft® 在深度部分厚度热烧伤患者中的应用。
Burns. 2022 Dec;48(8):1816-1824. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.07.013. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
4
A phase 3b, open-label, single-arm, multicenter, expanded-access study of the safety and clinical outcomes of StrataGraft® treatment in adults with deep partial-thickness thermal burns.一项 3b 期、开放性标签、单臂、多中心、扩大准入研究,评估 StrataGraft®治疗成人深度部分厚度热烧伤的安全性和临床结局。
Burns. 2024 Nov;50(8):2013-2022. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2024.05.023. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
5
Impact on Inpatient Length of Stay in Adults with Deep Partial-Thickness Burns: Comparing the Bioengineered Allogeneic Cellularized Construct Expanded-Access Trial with National Burn Repository Data.对成人深度部分厚度烧伤患者住院时间的影响:生物工程化同种异体细胞化构建物扩大使用试验与国家烧伤资料库数据的比较
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Sep 6;16:647-656. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S482398. eCollection 2024.
6
Phase I/II clinical evaluation of StrataGraft: a consistent, pathogen-free human skin substitute.StrataGraft的I/II期临床评估:一种一致的、无病原体的人皮肤替代物。
J Trauma. 2009 Mar;66(3):866-73; discussion 873-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819849d6.
7
StrataGraft skin substitute is well-tolerated and is not acutely immunogenic in patients with traumatic wounds: results from a prospective, randomized, controlled dose escalation trial.StrataGraft 皮肤替代物在创伤性伤口患者中具有良好的耐受性,且不会引起急性免疫原性:一项前瞻性、随机、对照剂量递增试验的结果。
Ann Surg. 2011 Apr;253(4):672-83. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318210f3bd.
8
Preclinical assessment of safety and efficacy of intravenous delivery of autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRCs) in the treatment of severe thermal burns using a porcine model.使用猪模型对自体脂肪源性再生细胞(ADRCs)静脉注射治疗严重热烧伤的安全性和有效性进行临床前评估。
Burns. 2018 Sep;44(6):1531-1542. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
9
[Effects of unified surgical scheme for wounds on the treatment outcome of patients with extensive deep burn].创面统一手术方案对大面积深度烧伤患者治疗效果的影响
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2015 Aug;31(4):254-8.
10
Maximizing wound coverage in full-thickness skin defects: A randomized-controlled trial of autologous skin cell suspension and widely meshed autograft versus standard autografting.最大限度地覆盖全层皮肤缺损:自体皮肤细胞悬液与广泛网孔自体移植与标准自体移植的随机对照试验。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Jan 1;96(1):85-93. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004120. Epub 2023 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Layer-by-layer assembly: advancing skin repair, one layer at a time.逐层组装:一次一层,推进皮肤修复。
RSC Adv. 2025 Apr 29;15(18):13908-13923. doi: 10.1039/d4ra08115c. eCollection 2025 Apr 28.
2
Impact on Inpatient Length of Stay in Adults with Deep Partial-Thickness Burns: Comparing the Bioengineered Allogeneic Cellularized Construct Expanded-Access Trial with National Burn Repository Data.对成人深度部分厚度烧伤患者住院时间的影响:生物工程化同种异体细胞化构建物扩大使用试验与国家烧伤资料库数据的比较
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Sep 6;16:647-656. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S482398. eCollection 2024.
3
Advancements in cell-based therapies for thermal burn wounds: a comprehensive systematic review of clinical trials outcomes.
细胞疗法治疗热烧伤创面的研究进展:临床试验结局的系统综述
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2024 Sep 4;15(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s13287-024-03901-2.
4
Sustainable Approach of Functional Biomaterials-Tissue Engineering for Skin Burn Treatment: A Comprehensive Review.用于皮肤烧伤治疗的功能性生物材料 - 组织工程的可持续方法:综述
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 May 5;16(5):701. doi: 10.3390/ph16050701.
5
Advances in Skin Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.皮肤组织工程与再生医学的进展。
J Burn Care Res. 2023 Jan 2;44(Suppl_1):S33-S41. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irac126.
6
Convergence of Biofabrication Technologies and Cell Therapies for Wound Healing.用于伤口愈合的生物制造技术与细胞疗法的融合
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Dec 8;14(12):2749. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14122749.
7
[Beyond esthetics-Regenerative medicine for severe diseases of the adnexa oculi].超越美学——用于严重眼附属器疾病的再生医学
Ophthalmologie. 2022 Sep;119(9):878-890. doi: 10.1007/s00347-022-01643-1. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
8
The Role of Skin Substitutes in Acute Burn and Reconstructive Burn Surgery: An Updated Comprehensive Review.皮肤替代物在急性烧伤和烧伤重建手术中的作用:最新综合综述
Semin Plast Surg. 2022 Apr 12;36(1):33-42. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1743455. eCollection 2022 Feb.