• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

羟氯喹联合标准治疗与单纯标准治疗用于 COVID-19 的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Hydroxychloroquine plus standard of care compared with standard of care alone in COVID-19: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Health Management and Economics Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

John G. Rangos School of Health Sciences, Duquesne University, 600 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15282, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 7;11(1):11974. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91089-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-91089-3
PMID:34099745
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8184930/
Abstract

The efficacy and safety of Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in treating coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is disputed. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of HCQ in addition to standard of care (SOC) in COVID-19. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of sciences, and medRxiv were searched up to March 15, 2021. Clinical studies registry databases were also searched for identifying potential clinical trials. The references list of the key studies was reviewed to identify additional relevant resources. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and Jadad checklist. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan software (version 5.3). Eleven randomized controlled trials with a total number of 8161 patients were identified as eligible for meta-analysis. No significant differences were observed between the two treatment groups in terms of negative rate of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Risk ratio [RR]: 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90, 1.08; P = 0.76), PCR negative conversion time (Mean difference [MD]: - 1.06, 95% CI - 3.10, 0.97; P = 0.30), all-cause mortality (RR: 1.09, 95% CI 1.00, 1.20; P = 0.06), body temperature recovery time (MD: - 0.64, 95% CI - 1.37, 0.10; P = 0.09), length of hospital stay (MD: - 0.17, 95% CI - 0.80, 0.46; P = 0.59), use of mechanical ventilation (RR: 1.12, 95% CI 0.95, 1.32; P = 0.19), and disease progression (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.37, 1.85; P = 0.64). However, there was a significant difference between two groups regarding adverse events (RR: 1.81, 95% CI 1.36, 2.42; P < 0.05). The findings suggest that the addition of HCQ to SOC has no benefit in the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Additionally, it is associated with more adverse events.

摘要

羟氯喹(HCQ)治疗冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的疗效和安全性存在争议。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在研究 HCQ 联合标准治疗(SOC)在 COVID-19 中的疗效和安全性。检索了 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase、Web of Sciences 和 medRxiv,检索时间截至 2021 年 3 月 15 日。还检索了临床试验注册数据库,以确定潜在的临床试验。综述了关键研究的参考文献,以确定其他相关资源。使用 Cochrane 协作工具和 Jadad 清单评估纳入研究的质量。使用 RevMan 软件(版本 5.3)进行荟萃分析。确定了 11 项符合条件的随机对照试验,共 8161 例患者纳入荟萃分析。两组在聚合酶链反应(PCR)阴性率(风险比[RR]:0.99,95%置信区间[CI]:0.90,1.08;P=0.76)、PCR 阴性转换时间(均数差[MD]:-1.06,95%CI:-3.10,0.97;P=0.30)、全因死亡率(RR:1.09,95%CI:1.00,1.20;P=0.06)、体温恢复时间(MD:-0.64,95%CI:-1.37,0.10;P=0.09)、住院时间(MD:-0.17,95%CI:-0.80,0.46;P=0.59)、机械通气使用率(RR:1.12,95%CI:0.95,1.32;P=0.19)和疾病进展(RR:0.82,95%CI:0.37,1.85;P=0.64)方面无显著差异。然而,两组之间的不良事件存在显著差异(RR:1.81,95%CI:1.36,2.42;P<0.05)。研究结果表明,HCQ 联合 SOC 治疗住院 COVID-19 患者没有益处,反而会增加不良事件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d912/8184930/1f3a2614b6d0/41598_2021_91089_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d912/8184930/6c63c5630b74/41598_2021_91089_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d912/8184930/4f14666c35ff/41598_2021_91089_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d912/8184930/e517c552f61d/41598_2021_91089_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d912/8184930/1f3a2614b6d0/41598_2021_91089_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d912/8184930/6c63c5630b74/41598_2021_91089_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d912/8184930/4f14666c35ff/41598_2021_91089_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d912/8184930/e517c552f61d/41598_2021_91089_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d912/8184930/1f3a2614b6d0/41598_2021_91089_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Hydroxychloroquine plus standard of care compared with standard of care alone in COVID-19: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.羟氯喹联合标准治疗与单纯标准治疗用于 COVID-19 的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 7;11(1):11974. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91089-3.
2
Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for prevention and treatment of COVID-19.氯喹或羟氯喹预防和治疗 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 12;2(2):CD013587. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis on chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as monotherapy or combined with azithromycin in COVID-19 treatment.一项关于氯喹和羟氯喹作为单一疗法或联合阿奇霉素治疗 COVID-19 的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 17;10(1):22139. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77748-x.
4
Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19.瑞德西韦用于治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 5;8(8):CD014962. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014962.
5
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19.伊维菌素预防和治疗 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 28;7(7):CD015017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015017.pub2.
6
Efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine against SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.羟氯喹/氯喹治疗 SARS-CoV-2 感染的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Jun;27(6):882-889. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.02.021. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
7
Effect of hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin on the mortality of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.羟氯喹联合或不联合阿奇霉素对 COVID-19 患者死亡率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Jan;27(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.08.022. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
8
Janus kinase inhibitors for the treatment of COVID-19.Janus 激酶抑制剂治疗 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 13;6(6):CD015209. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015209.
9
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19.伊维菌素预防和治疗 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 21;6(6):CD015017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015017.pub3.
10
Hydroxychloroquine use and progression or prognosis of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.羟氯喹的使用与 COVID-19 的进展或预后:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2021 Apr;394(4):775-782. doi: 10.1007/s00210-020-01964-5. Epub 2020 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring TMPRSS2 Drug Target to Combat Influenza and Coronavirus Infection.探索跨膜丝氨酸蛋白酶2药物靶点以对抗流感和冠状病毒感染。
Scientifica (Cairo). 2025 Apr 21;2025:3687892. doi: 10.1155/sci5/3687892. eCollection 2025.
2
Camostat Mesylate Versus Lopinavir/Ritonavir in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19-Results From a Randomized, Controlled, Open Label, Platform Trial (ACOVACT).甲磺酸卡莫司他与洛匹那韦/利托那韦用于住院COVID-19患者的疗效比较——一项随机、对照、开放标签、平台试验(ACOVACT)的结果
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jul 22;13:870493. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.870493. eCollection 2022.
3
Potential of Microneedle Systems for COVID-19 Vaccination: Current Trends and Challenges.

本文引用的文献

1
Leflunomide-hydroxychloroquine combination therapy in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (RepurpSS-I): a placebo-controlled, double-blinded, randomised clinical trial.来氟米特-羟氯喹联合治疗原发性干燥综合征患者(RepurpSS-I):一项安慰剂对照、双盲、随机临床试验。
Lancet Rheumatol. 2020 May;2(5):e260-e269. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30057-6. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
2
Clearing the Fog: Is Hydroxychloroquine Effective in Reducing Coronavirus Disease-2019 Progression? A Randomized Controlled Trial.拨开迷雾:羟氯喹在降低2019冠状病毒病进展方面是否有效?一项随机对照试验。
Cureus. 2021 Mar 30;13(3):e14186. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14186.
3
微针系统用于新冠疫苗接种的潜力:当前趋势与挑战
Pharmaceutics. 2022 May 16;14(5):1066. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14051066.
4
Efficacy of pharmacological interventions in COVID-19: A network meta-analysis.COVID-19 中药物干预的疗效:一项网络荟萃分析。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Sep;88(9):4080-4091. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15338. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
5
A Review of the Potential Roles of Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Pharmacological Approaches for the Management of Mild-to-Moderate Symptomatic COVID-19.抗氧化和抗炎药理学方法在管理轻至中度有症状 COVID-19 中的潜在作用综述。
Med Sci Monit. 2022 Mar 8;28:e936292. doi: 10.12659/MSM.936292.
6
Molecular Insights of SARS-CoV-2 Antivirals Administration: A Balance between Safety Profiles and Impact on Cardiovascular Phenotypes.新型冠状病毒2型抗病毒药物给药的分子见解:安全性与对心血管表型影响之间的平衡
Biomedicines. 2022 Feb 14;10(2):437. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10020437.
7
An update on drugs with therapeutic potential for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) treatment.关于具有治疗 SARS-CoV-2(COVID-19)潜力的药物的最新进展。
Drug Resist Updat. 2021 Dec;59:100794. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2021.100794. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
8
Medical imaging of pulmonary disease in SARS-CoV-2-exposed non-human primates.SARS-CoV-2 暴露的非人类灵长类动物肺部疾病的医学成像。
Trends Mol Med. 2022 Feb;28(2):123-142. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2021.12.001. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
9
Lactoferrin as Antiviral Treatment in COVID-19 Management: Preliminary Evidence.乳铁蛋白在 COVID-19 管理中的抗病毒治疗作用:初步证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 19;18(20):10985. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010985.
10
Drug-Induced Liver Disturbance During the Treatment of COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎治疗期间的药物性肝损伤
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Aug 18;12:719308. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.719308. eCollection 2021.
Repurposed Antiviral Drugs for Covid-19 - Interim WHO Solidarity Trial Results.
用于治疗新冠肺炎的抗病毒药物 repurposed - 世界卫生组织团结试验中期结果
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 11;384(6):497-511. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2023184. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
4
A multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of hydroxychloroquine and a retrospective study in adult patients with mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).一项多中心、随机、开放标签、对照试验,旨在评估羟氯喹的疗效和耐受性,以及一项针对轻症至中度 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)成年患者的回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 2;15(12):e0242763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242763. eCollection 2020.
5
A pragmatic randomized controlled trial reports lack of efficacy of hydroxychloroquine on coronavirus disease 2019 viral kinetics.一项实用随机对照试验报告称羟氯喹对 2019 年冠状病毒病病毒动力学无效。
Nat Commun. 2020 Oct 20;11(1):5284. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19056-6.
6
No benefit of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19: Results of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials".羟氯喹在 COVID-19 中无益:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析结果。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Nov-Dec;14(6):1673-1680. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.08.033. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
7
Effect of hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin on the mortality of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.羟氯喹联合或不联合阿奇霉素对 COVID-19 患者死亡率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Jan;27(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.08.022. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
8
Outcomes of Hydroxychloroquine Usage in United States Veterans Hospitalized with COVID-19.羟氯喹在美国 COVID-19 住院患者中的使用效果。
Med. 2020 Dec 18;1(1):114-127.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
9
RETRACTED: Hydroxychloroquine in the Treatment of COVID-19: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study.撤稿:羟氯喹治疗 COVID-19 的多中心随机对照研究。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Oct;103(4):1635-1639. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0873.
10
Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the COVID-19 epidemic in Brazil.巴西 COVID-19 疫情的流行病学和临床特征。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Aug;4(8):856-865. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0928-4. Epub 2020 Jul 31.