Major Ajay, Recklitis Christopher J, Bober Sharon
Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021 Apr 2;5(3):pkab031. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkab031. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Oncology health-care workers (HCWs) are facing substantial stressors during the current coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, resulting in a wide range of acute stress responses. To appropriately meet the growing mental health needs of HCWs, it is imperative to differentiate expectable stress responses from posttraumatic stress disorder and mental illness, because traditional mental health interventions may pathologize healthy stress reactions and risk retraumatizing HCWs under acute duress. Further, HCWs are experiencing protracted forms of acute stress as the pandemic continues, including moral injury, and require mental health interventions that are flexible and can adapt as the acuity of stressors changes. Previously developed frameworks to support people experiencing acute stress, such as Psychological First Aid, are particularly relevant for HCWs in the ongoing pandemic. Acute stress interventions like Psychological First Aid are guided by the Stress Continuum Model, which conceptualizes stress reactions on a continuum, from a zone of normal readiness and expectable consequences to a zone of more persistent and extreme reactions such as posttraumatic stress disorder and major depression. Key principles of the Stress Continuum Model include the expectation that emotional reactivity does not lead to psychiatric problems, that interventions need to be appropriately targeted to symptoms along the stress continuum, and that people will return to normal recovery. Various core actions to reduce acute stress include delivering practical assistance, reducing arousal, mobilizing support, and providing targeted collaborative services. This nonpathologizing approach offers a valuable framework for delivering both individual and organizational-level interventions during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
肿瘤医疗工作者(HCWs)在当前的2019冠状病毒病大流行期间面临着巨大的压力源,导致了一系列急性应激反应。为了适当地满足HCWs日益增长的心理健康需求,必须将可预期的应激反应与创伤后应激障碍和精神疾病区分开来,因为传统的心理健康干预可能会将健康的应激反应病理化,并有可能在急性压力下使HCWs再次受到创伤。此外,随着大流行的持续,HCWs正在经历长期形式的急性应激,包括道德伤害,他们需要灵活且能随着压力源的严重程度变化而调整的心理健康干预措施。先前制定的支持经历急性应激者的框架,如心理急救,对当前大流行中的HCWs尤为适用。像心理急救这样的急性应激干预措施是由应激连续体模型指导的,该模型将应激反应概念化为一个连续体,从正常准备状态和可预期后果的区域到更持久和极端反应的区域,如创伤后应激障碍和重度抑郁症。应激连续体模型的关键原则包括:情绪反应不会导致精神问题的预期;干预措施需要针对应激连续体上的症状进行适当调整;人们将恢复正常。减轻急性应激的各种核心行动包括提供实际援助、降低唤醒水平、动员支持以及提供有针对性的协作服务。这种非病理化的方法为在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间提供个人和组织层面的干预措施提供了一个有价值的框架。