Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2021 May;82(3):431-438. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2021.82.431.
The purpose of this study was to clarify the mediational pathways from genetic risk for alcohol use disorder (AUD) to AUD itself.
Using information on AUD status from first- through fourth-degree relatives obtained from national registries, we created a genetic risk score for AUD for the Swedish population. We first tested a simple mediational path model in males and females separately, with early onset externalizing psychopathology (EPP), internalizing psychopathology (IPP), and poor educational attainment (EA). We then tested a more complex model in a smaller, older sample of males that contained additional self-report measures from late adolescence.
In our basic model, the largest mediational pathway from AUD genetic risk to AUD in both sexes was via high EPP followed by low EA and high IPP. The EPP pathway was considerably stronger in males, the low EA pathway was modestly stronger in females, and the IPP pathway was identical in both sexes. Our more complex model replicated the strong externalizing pathway to AUD, showing that it connected to key downstream risk factors such as early drug and alcohol use and low resilience.
Our models concurred in showing that the strongest mediational pathway for genetic risk to AUD includes externalizing symptoms and disorders, which in turn predict further key downstream risk factors. Pathways through lower EA and IPP had smaller effects. IPP had mixed effects (partly predisposing and partly protective) on downstream risk factors. The largest sex difference was a stronger externalizing pathway to genetic risk to AUD in males than in females.
本研究旨在阐明酒精使用障碍(AUD)遗传风险向 AUD 本身的中介途径。
利用全国登记处获得的一级至四级亲属的 AUD 状态信息,我们为瑞典人群创建了 AUD 的遗传风险评分。我们首先在男性和女性中分别测试了一个简单的中介路径模型,其中包括早期外显型精神病理学(EPP)、内隐型精神病理学(IPP)和较差的教育程度(EA)。然后,我们在一个较小的、年龄较大的男性样本中测试了一个更复杂的模型,其中包含了来自青春期后期的额外自我报告测量。
在我们的基本模型中,男女两性 AUD 遗传风险向 AUD 的最大中介途径是通过高 EPP 接着是低 EA 和高 IPP。EPP 途径在男性中要强得多,低 EA 途径在女性中稍强,IPP 途径在两性中相同。我们更复杂的模型复制了 AUD 的强烈外显途径,表明它与关键的下游风险因素如早期药物和酒精使用以及低适应力有关。
我们的模型一致表明,遗传风险向 AUD 的最强中介途径包括外显症状和障碍,这些症状和障碍反过来又预测了进一步的关键下游风险因素。通过较低的 EA 和 IPP 的途径则有较小的影响。IPP 对下游风险因素有混合的影响(部分易患,部分保护)。最大的性别差异是男性比女性 AUD 遗传风险的外显途径更强。