Research Institute of Hearing Enhancement, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju, South Korea;Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju, South Korea.
J Int Adv Otol. 2021 May;17(3):215-220. doi: 10.5152/iao.2021.9182.
To evaluate the effect of combined hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) and steroid therapy in severe idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL).
Between January 2010 and July 2017, we evaluated 218 patients with ISSNHL and divided them into 2 groups: those with hearing loss greater than 80 dB and those with hearing loss of 60-79 dB. Each group was further divided into 3 groups according to the treatment method: oral steroids alone (PO), PO+intratympanic injection (IT), and PO+IT+HBOT. The treatment effect was evaluated for improvement in hearing thresholds at mid-term (3 weeks later) and final term (2 months later).
When comparing the 3 treatment groups within the group that had a hearing loss greater than 80 dB, no differences were observed in the gaps in hearing thresholds and in the duration of improvement (P = .0764 and .2938, respectively). However, in the group with 60-79 dB hearing loss, the gaps in hearing thresholds at mid-term were 27.50 dB in the PO group, 38.13 dB in the PO+IT group, and 51.25 dB in the PO+IT+HBOT group. The treatment was more effective and faster in the initial period in the PO+IT+HBOT group than in the other groups. In addition, the results of frequency analysis showed greatest treatment efficacy at low frequencies of hearing.
Patients with ISSNHL above 80 dB are less likely to recover hearing even after PO+IT+HBOT. However, this treatment initially accelerates recovery in patients with a hearing loss below 80 dB. Therefore, the appropriate indication for HBOT benefits in patients with severe or profound ISSNHL should be reviewed.
评估高压氧联合激素治疗特发性突发性聋(ISSNHL)的疗效。
2010 年 1 月至 2017 年 7 月,我们评估了 218 例 ISSNHL 患者,并将其分为两组:听力损失大于 80dB 组和听力损失为 60-79dB 组。每组根据治疗方法进一步分为三组:单纯口服激素(PO)组、PO+鼓室内注射(IT)组和 PO+IT+高压氧(HBOT)组。中期(3 周后)和最终(2 个月后)评估听力阈值改善的治疗效果。
在听力损失大于 80dB 的组内比较 3 种治疗组时,听力阈值差距和改善持续时间无差异(P=0.0764 和 0.2938)。然而,在听力损失为 60-79dB 的组中,PO 组中期听力阈值差距为 27.50dB,PO+IT 组为 38.13dB,PO+IT+HBOT 组为 51.25dB。在 PO+IT+HBOT 组,初始治疗阶段的效果更快且更显著。此外,频率分析结果表明,在低频听力时治疗效果最大。
即使接受 PO+IT+HBOT,听力损失大于 80dB 的 ISSNHL 患者也不太可能恢复听力。然而,这种治疗方法最初会加速听力损失低于 80dB 的患者的恢复。因此,应重新评估严重或深度 ISSNHL 患者接受 HBOT 的适当适应证。