• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用基于计算机的健康评估系统(CHES)支持症状和功能健康的自我管理:基于网络的患者门户在血液病患者中的使用评估。

Using the Computer-based Health Evaluation System (CHES) to Support Self-management of Symptoms and Functional Health: Evaluation of Hematological Patient Use of a Web-Based Patient Portal.

机构信息

University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Oncotyrol - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 8;23(6):e26022. doi: 10.2196/26022.

DOI:10.2196/26022
PMID:34100765
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8262597/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient portals offer the possibility to assess patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) remotely, and first evidence has demonstrated their potential benefits.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we evaluated patient use of a web-based patient portal that provides patient information and allows online completion of PROMs. A particular focus was on patient motivation for (not) using the portal. The portal was developed to supplement routine monitoring at the Department of Internal Medicine V in Innsbruck.

METHODS

We included patients with multiple myeloma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia who were already participating in routine monitoring at the hospital for use of the patient portal. Patients were introduced to the portal and asked to complete questionnaires prior to their next hospital visits. We used system access logs and 3 consecutive semistructured interviews to analyze patient use and evaluation of the portal.

RESULTS

Between July 2017 and August 2020, we approached 122 patients for participation in the study, of whom 83.6% (102/122) consented to use the patient portal. Patients were on average 60 (SD 10.4) years old. Of patients providing data at all study time points, 37% (26/71) consistently used the portal prior to their hospital visits. The main reason for not completing PROMs was forgetting to do so in between visits (25/84, 29%). During an average session, patients viewed 5.3 different pages and spent 9.4 minutes logged on to the portal. Feedback from interviews was largely positive with no patients reporting difficulties navigating the survey and 50% of patients valuing the self-management tools provided in the portal. Regarding the portal content, patients were interested in reviewing their own results and reported high satisfaction with the dynamic self-management advice, also reflected in the high number of clicks on those pages.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient portals can contribute to patient empowerment by offering sought-after information and self-management advice. In our study, the majority of our patients were open to using the portal. The low number of technical complaints and average time spent in the portal demonstrate the feasibility of our patient portal. While initial interest was high, long-term use was considerably lower and identified as the main area for improvement. In a next step, we will improve several aspects of the patient portal (eg, including a reminder to visit the portal before the next appointment and closer PROM symptom monitoring via an onconurse).

摘要

背景

患者门户提供了远程评估患者报告的结果测量(PROM)的可能性,并且已经有初步证据表明了其潜在的益处。

目的

本研究评估了一种基于网络的患者门户的患者使用情况,该门户提供患者信息并允许在线完成 PROM。特别关注的是患者使用(不)门户的动机。该门户是为了补充因斯布鲁克第五内科部门的常规监测而开发的。

方法

我们纳入了已经参加医院常规监测的多发性骨髓瘤和慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者,以使用患者门户。在下次就诊前,患者会被介绍给门户并被要求完成问卷。我们使用系统访问日志和连续 3 次半结构化访谈来分析患者对门户的使用和评估。

结果

在 2017 年 7 月至 2020 年 8 月期间,我们向 122 名患者提出了参与研究的邀请,其中 83.6%(102/122)同意使用患者门户。患者的平均年龄为 60 岁(标准差 10.4)。在所有研究时间点提供数据的患者中,37%(26/71)在就诊前一直使用门户。未完成 PROM 的主要原因是就诊期间忘记完成(25/84,29%)。在一次平均就诊中,患者浏览了 5.3 个不同的页面,在门户上登录了 9.4 分钟。访谈反馈基本上是积极的,没有患者报告在浏览调查时有困难,50%的患者重视门户中提供的自我管理工具。关于门户内容,患者对查看自己的结果感兴趣,并对动态自我管理建议表示高度满意,这也反映在对这些页面的高点击率上。

结论

患者门户可以通过提供所需的信息和自我管理建议,为患者赋权。在我们的研究中,大多数患者都愿意使用门户。技术投诉数量低,在门户上花费的平均时间表明我们的患者门户是可行的。虽然最初的兴趣很高,但长期使用的情况要低得多,这是需要改进的主要领域。下一步,我们将改进患者门户的几个方面(例如,在下次预约前包括访问门户的提醒,通过 oncource 更密切地监测 PROM 症状)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/8262597/559ed8a957ea/jmir_v23i6e26022_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/8262597/3ad43cc16941/jmir_v23i6e26022_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/8262597/21bfd959149b/jmir_v23i6e26022_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/8262597/1b0e9b38f88d/jmir_v23i6e26022_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/8262597/559ed8a957ea/jmir_v23i6e26022_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/8262597/3ad43cc16941/jmir_v23i6e26022_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/8262597/21bfd959149b/jmir_v23i6e26022_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/8262597/1b0e9b38f88d/jmir_v23i6e26022_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/8262597/559ed8a957ea/jmir_v23i6e26022_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Using the Computer-based Health Evaluation System (CHES) to Support Self-management of Symptoms and Functional Health: Evaluation of Hematological Patient Use of a Web-Based Patient Portal.利用基于计算机的健康评估系统(CHES)支持症状和功能健康的自我管理:基于网络的患者门户在血液病患者中的使用评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 8;23(6):e26022. doi: 10.2196/26022.
2
Patient Portals as Facilitators of Engagement in Patients With Diabetes and Chronic Heart Disease: Scoping Review of Usage and Usability.患者门户促进糖尿病和慢性心脏疾病患者的参与:使用和可用性的范围回顾。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 25;25:e38447. doi: 10.2196/38447.
3
Disparities in Patient-Reported Interest in Web-Based Patient Portals: Survey at an Urban Academic Safety-Net Hospital.患者报告的对基于网络的患者门户的兴趣差异:在一家城市学术安全网医院进行的调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 26;21(3):e11421. doi: 10.2196/11421.
4
Patients' Experiences of Web-Based Access to Electronic Health Records in Finland: Cross-sectional Survey.芬兰患者对基于网络的电子健康记录访问的体验:横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 6;24(6):e37438. doi: 10.2196/37438.
5
Adherence to Patient-Reported Symptom Monitoring and Subsequent Clinical Interventions for Patients With Multiple Myeloma in Outpatient Care: Longitudinal Observational Study.门诊多发性骨髓瘤患者报告症状监测及其后续临床干预的依从性:纵向观察研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 22;25:e46017. doi: 10.2196/46017.
6
Health professionals' expectations of a national patient portal for self-management.卫生专业人员对国家患者门户进行自我管理的期望。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Sep;117:82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jun 9.
7
A Qualitative Study of the Barriers and Opportunities for Adoption of Web-Portals for Doctors and Patients in Russia.俄罗斯医生和患者采用网络门户的障碍与机遇的定性研究
J Med Syst. 2017 Apr;41(4):62. doi: 10.1007/s10916-017-0713-8. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
8
Effects of a Web-Based Patient Portal on Patient Satisfaction and Missed Appointment Rates: Survey Study.基于网络的患者门户对患者满意度和失约率的影响:调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 19;22(5):e17955. doi: 10.2196/17955.
9
Maternity patients' access to their electronic medical records: use and perspectives of a patient portal.产妇获取其电子病历:患者门户网站的使用情况与观点
Health Inf Manag. 2015;44(1):4-11. doi: 10.1177/183335831504400101.
10
Factors Affecting Portal Usage Among Chronically Ill Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Netherlands: Cross-sectional Study.荷兰新冠疫情期间慢性病患者使用门户网站的影响因素:横断面研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2021 Jul 19;8(3):e26003. doi: 10.2196/26003.

引用本文的文献

1
Adherence to daily electronic symptom screening in pediatric cancer: associations with time, location and pain.儿科癌症患者每日电子症状筛查的依从性:与时间、地点和疼痛的关联
Qual Life Res. 2025 Jun 10. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-04002-0.
2
Current Implementation of Digital Health in Chronic Disease Management: Scoping Review.慢性病管理中数字健康的当前实施情况:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 12;26:e53576. doi: 10.2196/53576.
3
The impact of curative cancer treatment on sexual health - clinical results from the EORTC QLQ-SH22 validation study.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-Reported Outcomes as Independent Prognostic Factors for Survival in Oncology: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.患者报告结局作为肿瘤学中生存的独立预后因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Value Health. 2021 Feb;24(2):250-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.10.017. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
2
Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial of eRAPID: eHealth Intervention During Chemotherapy.三期随机对照试验 eRAPID:化疗期间的电子健康干预。
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;39(7):734-747. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02015. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
3
Electronic reporting of patient-reported outcomes in a fragile and comorbid population during cancer therapy - a feasibility study.
癌症治疗对性健康的影响 - EORTC QLQ-SH22 验证研究的临床结果。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Nov 11;24(1):1374. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13123-7.
4
Barriers and facilitators to the uptake of electronic collection and use of patient-reported measures in routine care of older adults: a systematic review with qualitative evidence synthesis.老年人常规护理中采用患者报告测量的电子收集和使用的障碍与促进因素:一项基于定性证据综合的系统评价
JAMIA Open. 2024 Aug 2;7(3):ooae068. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae068. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
Using patient portals for large-scale recruitment of individuals underrepresented in biomedical research: an evaluation of engagement patterns throughout the patient portal recruitment process at a single site within the All of Us Research Program.利用患者门户在生物医学研究中代表性不足的个体中进行大规模招募:对 All of Us 研究计划中一个单一站点的患者门户招募过程中的参与模式进行评估。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Oct 1;31(10):2328-2336. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae135.
6
[Application and Effect of Patient Portal System in the Remote Management of Chronic Diseases for Older Adults With Coronary Heart Disease].[患者门户系统在老年冠心病患者慢性病远程管理中的应用及效果]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Mar 20;55(2):418-424. doi: 10.12182/20240360503.
7
Usability of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Older Patients With Cancer: Secondary Analysis of Data from an Observational Single Center Study.电子患者报告结局测量工具在老年癌症患者中的可用性:一项观察性单中心研究数据的二次分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 21;25:e49476. doi: 10.2196/49476.
8
Adherence to Patient-Reported Symptom Monitoring and Subsequent Clinical Interventions for Patients With Multiple Myeloma in Outpatient Care: Longitudinal Observational Study.门诊多发性骨髓瘤患者报告症状监测及其后续临床干预的依从性:纵向观察研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 22;25:e46017. doi: 10.2196/46017.
9
Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of iConquerFear: a self-guided digital intervention for fear of cancer recurrence.iConquerFear 的可行性和初步疗效:一种针对癌症复发恐惧的自我引导型数字干预措施。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Apr;18(2):425-438. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01233-9. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
10
Physicians' Perceptions of Clinical Utility of a Digital Health Tool for Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Monitoring in Real-Life Hematology Practice. Evidence From the GIMEMA-ALLIANCE Platform.医生对数字健康工具在实际血液学实践中进行电子患者报告结局监测的临床效用的认知。来自GIMEMA-ALLIANCE平台的证据。
Front Oncol. 2022 Mar 17;12:826040. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.826040. eCollection 2022.
电子报告在癌症治疗期间脆弱且合并症较多的患者中的患者报告结局 - 一项可行性研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jul 11;18(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01480-3.
4
Using an implementation science approach to implement and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) initiatives in routine care settings.采用实施科学方法在常规护理环境中实施和评估患者报告的结果测量(PROM)措施。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Nov;30(11):3015-3033. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02564-9. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
5
Impact of Standardized Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Use on Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalization: Results of a Population-Based Retrospective Matched Cohort Analysis.标准化埃德蒙顿症状评估系统应用对急诊科就诊和住院的影响:基于人群的回顾性匹配队列分析结果。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Sep;16(9):e958-e965. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00660. Epub 2020 May 28.
6
Haematologists' experiences implementing patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in an outpatient clinic: a qualitative study for applied practice.血液科医生在门诊实施患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)的经验:一项应用实践的定性研究
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 Dec 28;3(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0166-6.
7
The role of self-management in cancer survivorship care.自我管理在癌症幸存者护理中的作用。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jan;21(1):8-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30715-6. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
8
Role of eHealth application Oncokompas in supporting self-management of symptoms and health-related quality of life in cancer survivors: a randomised, controlled trial.电子健康应用 Oncokompas 在支持癌症幸存者自我管理症状和健康相关生活质量中的作用:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jan;21(1):80-94. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30675-8. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
9
Thresholds for clinical importance were established to improve interpretation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in clinical practice and research.临床重要性的阈值是为了提高在临床实践和研究中对 EORTC QLQ-C30 的解释而建立的。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;118:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.003. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
10
Fifteen Years' Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures at the Group and Patient Levels: Trend Analysis.在群体和患者层面使用患者报告结局测量指标的十五年:趋势分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 30;21(9):e15856. doi: 10.2196/15856.