Centre for General Medicine and Geriatrics, Mainz University Medical Centre, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Am Pulverturm 13, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2021 Oct;171(13-14):321-329. doi: 10.1007/s10354-021-00849-3. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
Medical guidelines aim to ensure that care processes take place in an evidence-based and structured manner. They are especially relevant in outpatient primary care due to the wide range of symptoms and clinical pictures. In German-speaking countries, there is a lack of current findings documenting general practitioners' opinions and experiences regarding guidelines, their expectations and their views on what improvements could be made to increase the use of this type of evidence-based instrument in the primary care setting. Between April and August 2020, a total of 3098 general practitioners were surveyed in the states of Baden-Württemberg, Hesse and Rhineland-Palatinate via an online questionnaire. Alongside the descriptive evaluation, t‑testing was used to determine significant differences between two independent sampling groups. A factor analysis was also used to cluster the expectations of those surveyed regarding the fulfilment of requirements relating to guidelines. A total of 52% of those surveyed have a positive view of guidelines. Overall, guidelines are associated with an increased evidence-based approach (69%), standardisation of diagnosis and treatment (62%) and a reduction in overprovision or underprovision of care (57%). In all, 62% of the physicians who implemented guidelines observed positive effects on the quality of care provided, and 67% reported that the implementation of guidelines improved the quality of their diagnostic or therapeutic skills. However, implementation is often seen as being complicated (43%) and restricting the physician's ability to act independently (63%). Survey participants suggested that guidelines could be optimised by giving greater consideration to nondrug alternatives (46%), focusing on issues related to quality of life (42%) and offering a comparative assessment of various treatment options (39%). In order to further promote the attractiveness of guidelines for primary care the design of guidelines should be oriented more towards their application; they should be well-presented to make them easier to implement. The scope of action available to the physician should be stressed. The guidelines should provide recommendations on opportunities for the delegation of tasks within practice teams.
医疗指南旨在确保医疗过程以循证和结构化的方式进行。它们在门诊初级保健中尤为重要,因为这里有广泛的症状和临床表现。在德语国家,缺乏当前的研究结果来记录全科医生对指南的看法和经验、他们的期望以及他们对哪些方面可以改进以提高这种基于证据的工具在初级保健环境中的使用的看法。2020 年 4 月至 8 月期间,通过在线问卷对巴登-符腾堡州、黑森州和莱茵兰-普法尔茨州的 3098 名全科医生进行了调查。除了描述性评估外,t 检验还用于确定两个独立抽样组之间的显著差异。还使用因子分析对调查对象对满足指南要求的期望进行聚类。共有 52%的受访者对指南持积极态度。总体而言,指南与增加循证方法(69%)、诊断和治疗标准化(62%)以及减少过度或不足的护理(57%)相关联。所有实施指南的医生中有 62%观察到对提供的护理质量有积极影响,67%的医生报告说实施指南提高了他们的诊断或治疗技能的质量。然而,实施指南常常被认为很复杂(43%),并限制了医生独立行动的能力(63%)。调查参与者建议,通过更多地考虑非药物替代方案(46%)、关注与生活质量相关的问题(42%)以及提供各种治疗方案的比较评估(39%),可以对指南进行优化。为了进一步提高初级保健中指南的吸引力,指南的设计应该更侧重于其应用;它们应该易于实施,呈现方式也要更好。应强调医生的行动范围。指南应就实践团队内任务委托的机会提供建议。