Suppr超能文献

呼吁采用标准化方法报告患者报告的结局测量指标:临床相关比值。

A Call for a Standardized Approach to Reporting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Clinical Relevance Ratio.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Nov 17;103(22):e91. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00030.

Abstract

A shift toward a value-driven health-care model has made prospective collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) inextricably tied to measuring the success of orthopaedic surgery and patient satisfaction. While progress has been made in optimizing the utilization of PROM data, including establishing appropriate PROMs for a procedure and determining the clinical importance of unique tools, if these PROMs are not accurately analyzed and reported, a proportion of patients who do not reach the clinical thresholds may go unnoticed. Furthermore, parameters are unclear for setting a statistically and clinically important PROM threshold along with a minimum period for follow-up data collection.In this forum, we walk through simulated data sets modeling PROMs with the example of total joint arthroplasty. We discuss how the commonly used method of reporting PROMs by mean change can overestimate the treatment effects for the cohort as a whole and fail to capture distinct populations that are below a clinically relevant threshold. We demonstrate that when a study's outcome is PROMs, clinical importance should be reported using clinical thresholds such as the minimum clinically important difference (MCID), the smallest change in the treatment outcome that a patient perceives as beneficial, and the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), the highest level of symptoms beyond which a patient considers himself or herself well. Finally, we propose a standardized reporting of PROMs that incorporates both the MCID and the PASS, and introduce a "clinical relevance ratio," which relies on a clinically relevant threshold to dichotomize outcomes and reports the number of patients achieving clinical importance at a given time point divided by the total number of patients included in the study. Unlike other common PROM-reporting approaches, the clinical relevance ratio is not skewed by patients who are lost to follow-up with increased time.

摘要

向以价值为导向的医疗保健模式转变使得前瞻性收集患者报告的结果测量(PROM)与衡量骨科手术的成功和患者满意度密不可分。虽然在优化 PROM 数据的利用方面已经取得了进展,包括为手术建立适当的 PROM 并确定独特工具的临床重要性,但如果这些 PROM 没有得到准确的分析和报告,那么可能会忽略一部分未达到临床阈值的患者。此外,关于设置具有统计学和临床意义的 PROM 阈值以及收集随访数据的最小时间参数还不明确。

在本论坛中,我们以全关节置换术为例,通过模拟数据集来演示 PROM 的建模。我们讨论了报告 PROM 的常用均值变化方法如何会高估整个队列的治疗效果,并且无法捕捉到低于临床相关阈值的不同人群。我们证明,当研究的结果是 PROM 时,应使用临床阈值(如最小临床重要差异(MCID)、患者感知到的治疗效果的最小变化以及患者可接受的症状状态(PASS),即患者认为自己身体状况良好的最高水平的症状)来报告临床重要性。最后,我们提出了一种标准化的 PROM 报告方法,该方法同时包含 MCID 和 PASS,并引入了“临床相关性比”,它依赖于临床相关阈值将结果分为二分类,并报告在给定时间点达到临床重要性的患者数量除以研究中纳入的患者总数。与其他常见的 PROM 报告方法不同,临床相关性比不会因随着时间的推移而失去随访的患者而产生偏差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验