Estación Experimental del Zaidín (CSIC), Profesor Albareda 1, 18008 Granada, Spain.
Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Peter Wilson Building King's Buildings, W Mains Rd, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, United Kingdom.
Animal. 2021 Jul;15(7):100267. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100267. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
The research about the role of saliva in ruminants has been mainly focused on its buffering capacity together with facilitation of the rumination process. However, the role of salivary bioactive components on modulating the activity of the rumen microbiota has been neglected until recently. This study developed an in vitro approach to assess the impact of different components in saliva on rumen microbial fermentation. Four different salivary fractions were prepared from four goats: (i) non-filtrated saliva (NFS), (ii) filtrated through 0.25 µm to remove microorganisms and large particles (FS1), (iii) centrifuged through a 30 kDa filter to remove large proteins, (FS2), and (iv) autoclaved saliva (AS) to keep only the minerals. Two experiments were conducted in 24 h batch culture incubations with 6 ml of total volume consisting of 2 ml of rumen fluid and 4 ml of saliva/buffer mix. In Experiment 1, the effect of increasing the proportion of saliva (either NFS or FS1) in the solution (0%, 16%, 33% and 50% of the total volume) was evaluated. Treatment FS1 promoted greater total volatile fatty acids (VFA) (+8.4%) and butyrate molar proportion (+2.8%) but lower NH-N concentrations than NFS fraction. Replacing the bicarbonate buffer solution by increasing proportions of saliva resulted in higher NH-N, total VFA (+8.0%) and propionate molar proportion (+11%). Experiment 2 addressed the effect of the different fractions of saliva (NFS, FS1, FS2 and AS). Saliva fractions led to higher total VFA and NH-N concentrations than non-saliva incubations, which suggests that the presence of some salivary elements enhanced rumen microbial activity. Fraction FS1 promoted a higher concentration of total VFA (+7.8%) than the other three fractions, and higher propionate (+26%) than NFS and AS. This agrees with findings from Experiment 1 and supports that 'microbe-free saliva', in which large salivary proteins are maintained, boosts rumen fermentation. Our results show the usefulness of this in vitro approach and suggest that different salivary components can modulate rumen microbial fermentation, although the specific metabolites and effects they cause need further research.
关于反刍动物唾液作用的研究主要集中在其缓冲能力以及促进反刍过程方面。然而,直到最近,唾液生物活性成分在调节瘤胃微生物区系活性方面的作用才被忽视。本研究开发了一种体外方法来评估不同唾液成分对瘤胃微生物发酵的影响。从四只山羊中制备了四种不同的唾液成分:(i)未经过滤的唾液(NFS),(ii)通过 0.25 µm 过滤以去除微生物和大颗粒(FS1),(iii)通过 30 kDa 过滤器离心以去除大蛋白(FS2),和(iv)巴氏消毒的唾液(AS)以仅保留矿物质。在 24 小时分批培养孵育中进行了两项实验,总容积为 6ml,其中包含 2ml 瘤胃液和 4ml 唾液/缓冲液混合物。在实验 1 中,评估了增加溶液中唾液比例(NFS 或 FS1,总容积的 0%、16%、33%和 50%)的效果。FS1 处理促进了更高的总挥发性脂肪酸(VFA)(+8.4%)和丁酸摩尔比例(+2.8%),但 NH-N 浓度低于 NFS 部分。用增加的唾液比例替代碳酸氢盐缓冲溶液导致 NH-N、总 VFA(+8.0%)和丙酸摩尔比例(+11%)升高。实验 2 研究了唾液的不同成分(NFS、FS1、FS2 和 AS)的影响。与非唾液孵育相比,唾液成分导致总 VFA 和 NH-N 浓度更高,这表明一些唾液成分增强了瘤胃微生物的活性。FS1 部分比其他三个部分促进更高的总 VFA 浓度(+7.8%),并且比 NFS 和 AS 促进更高的丙酸(+26%)。这与实验 1 的结果一致,并支持“无微生物的唾液”,其中保留了大量的唾液蛋白,可促进瘤胃发酵。我们的结果表明了这种体外方法的有用性,并表明不同的唾液成分可以调节瘤胃微生物发酵,尽管它们引起的特定代谢物和影响需要进一步研究。