• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多项目量表中缺失数据处理的多种插补策略比较:对纵向研究的指导。

A comparison of multiple imputation strategies for handling missing data in multi-item scales: Guidance for longitudinal studies.

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2021 Sep 20;40(21):4660-4674. doi: 10.1002/sim.9088. Epub 2021 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1002/sim.9088
PMID:34102709
Abstract

Medical research often involves using multi-item scales to assess individual characteristics, disease severity, and other health-related outcomes. It is common to observe missing data in the scale scores, due to missing data in one or more items that make up that score. Multiple imputation (MI) is a popular method for handling missing data. However, it is not clear how best to use MI in the context of scale scores, particularly when they are assessed at multiple waves of data collection resulting in large numbers of items. The aim of this article is to provide practical advice on how to impute missing values in a repeatedly measured multi-item scale using MI when inference on the scale score is of interest. We evaluated the performance of five MI strategies for imputing missing data at either the item or scale level using simulated data and a case study based on four waves of the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC). MI was implemented using both multivariate normal imputation and fully conditional specification, with two rules for calculating the scale score. A complete case analysis was also performed for comparison. Based on our results, we caution against the use of a MI strategy that does not include the scale score in the imputation model(s) when the scale score is required for analysis.

摘要

医学研究通常涉及使用多项目量表来评估个体特征、疾病严重程度和其他与健康相关的结果。由于构成该评分的一个或多个项目中存在缺失数据,因此在量表评分中观察到缺失数据是很常见的。多重插补(MI)是一种处理缺失数据的常用方法。然而,在量表评分的背景下,尚不清楚如何最好地使用 MI,特别是当它们在多次数据收集的多个波次中进行评估,导致项目数量众多时。本文的目的是提供有关如何使用 MI 在重复测量的多项目量表中插补缺失值的实用建议,当对量表评分进行推断时,这是很有意义的。我们使用模拟数据和基于澳大利亚儿童纵向研究(LSAC)的四个波次的案例研究评估了五种在项目或量表水平上插补缺失数据的 MI 策略的性能。MI 使用多元正态插补和完全条件指定来实现,其中包括两种计算量表评分的规则。还进行了完全案例分析以供比较。根据我们的结果,我们警告说,当需要对量表评分进行分析时,在插补模型中不包括量表评分的 MI 策略是不可取的。

相似文献

1
A comparison of multiple imputation strategies for handling missing data in multi-item scales: Guidance for longitudinal studies.多项目量表中缺失数据处理的多种插补策略比较:对纵向研究的指导。
Stat Med. 2021 Sep 20;40(21):4660-4674. doi: 10.1002/sim.9088. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
2
A comparison of multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in longitudinal data in the presence of a time-varying covariate with a non-linear association with time: a simulation study.存在与时间呈非线性关联的时变协变量时,用于处理纵向数据中缺失值的多种多重填补方法的比较:一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Jul 25;17(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0372-y.
3
A comparison of multiple imputation methods for missing data in longitudinal studies.纵向研究中缺失数据的多种插补方法比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Dec 12;18(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0615-6.
4
Multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in a longitudinal categorical variable with restrictions on transitions over time: a simulation study.多种插补方法处理具有时间过渡限制的纵向分类变量中的缺失值:一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jan 10;19(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0653-0.
5
Multiple imputation for patient reported outcome measures in randomised controlled trials: advantages and disadvantages of imputing at the item, subscale or composite score level.在随机对照试验中对患者报告结局测量进行多重插补:在项目、分量表或综合评分层面插补的优缺点。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Aug 28;18(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0542-6.
6
Multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in longitudinal studies with sampling weights: Comparison of methods implemented in Stata.多重插补方法处理纵向研究中带有抽样权重的缺失值:Stata 中实现方法的比较。
Biom J. 2021 Feb;63(2):354-371. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201900360. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
7
Missing data in a multi-item instrument were best handled by multiple imputation at the item score level.多项目量表中的缺失数据最好在项目得分层面采用多重插补处理。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Mar;67(3):335-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.09.009. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
8
Evaluation of approaches for multiple imputation of three-level data.三水平数据的多重插补方法评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Aug 12;20(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01079-8.
9
Passive imputation and parcel summaries are both valid to handle missing items in studies with many multi-item scales.在有多个多项目量表的研究中,缺失值可以使用被动填补和包裹摘要两种方法来处理。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Apr;27(4):1128-1140. doi: 10.1177/0962280216654511. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
10
Assessing Alternative Imputation Strategies for Infrequently Missing Items on Multi-item Scales.评估多项目量表中缺失情况不常见项目的替代插补策略。
Commun Stat Case Stud Data Anal Appl. 2022;8(4):682-713. doi: 10.1080/23737484.2022.2115430. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
SunGold Kiwifruit and Psychological Health (GoKiPH): A Randomised Controlled Crossover Trial.阳光金奇异果与心理健康(GoKiPH):一项随机对照交叉试验。
Nutrients. 2025 Apr 18;17(8):1375. doi: 10.3390/nu17081375.
2
Believing that difficulty signals importance improves school outcomes by bolstering academic possible identities, a recursive analysis.相信困难信号重要性通过增强学术可能性身份来提高学校成绩,一种递归分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 21;19(10):e0308376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308376. eCollection 2024.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of an Intensive Upper Limb Rehabilitation Therapy for Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: An Economic Evaluation of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
针对单侧脑瘫儿童的强化上肢康复治疗的成本效益:一项随机对照试验的经济学评估
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2024 Apr 11;11(1):103-111. doi: 10.36469/001c.94460. eCollection 2024.
4
Assessing the Clinical Efficacy of a Virtual Reality Tool for the Treatment of Obesity: Randomized Controlled Trial.评估虚拟现实工具治疗肥胖症的临床疗效:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 5;26:e51558. doi: 10.2196/51558.
5
Carbohydrate quality, not quantity, linked to reduced colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in US populations: evidence from a prospective study.碳水化合物质量而非数量与美国人群结直肠癌发病率和死亡率降低相关:来自前瞻性研究的证据。
BMC Med. 2024 Mar 5;22(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03325-y.
6
A comparison of strategies for selecting auxiliary variables for multiple imputation.辅助变量选择策略在多重插补中的比较。
Biom J. 2024 Jan;66(1):e2200291. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202200291.
7
Association between adherence to Eat-Lancet diet and incidence and mortality of lung cancer: A prospective cohort study.《柳叶刀饮食与肺癌发病率和死亡率的关系:一项前瞻性队列研究》
Cancer Sci. 2023 Nov;114(11):4433-4444. doi: 10.1111/cas.15941. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
8
Association between sulfur microbial diet and the risk of colorectal cancer precursors in older adults.老年人硫微生物饮食与结直肠癌前体风险之间的关联。
Front Nutr. 2023 Aug 14;10:1167372. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1167372. eCollection 2023.
9
Assessing Alternative Imputation Strategies for Infrequently Missing Items on Multi-item Scales.评估多项目量表中缺失情况不常见项目的替代插补策略。
Commun Stat Case Stud Data Anal Appl. 2022;8(4):682-713. doi: 10.1080/23737484.2022.2115430. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
10
Characterization of missing data patterns and mechanisms in longitudinal composite outcome trial in rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎纵向复合结局试验中缺失数据模式及机制的特征分析
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2022 Sep 17;14:1759720X221114103. doi: 10.1177/1759720X221114103. eCollection 2022.