Department of Emergency Medicine, Kayseri City Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021 Jun;31(6):668-672. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2021.06.668.
To evaluate the usability of electrocardiography (ECG) intervals in the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of acute carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning.
An observational study.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Kayseri City Hospital, Turkey, from November 2018 to May 2019.
Each of 80 patients for study and control groups were prospectively included. For study group, pre- and post-treatment ECG intervals (P-wave and QRS complex periods, PP, PR, RR, QT, and QTc intervals) and carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) levels of the patients were evaluated. For control group, ECG intervals and COHb levels of the patients during admission to the Emergency Department were evaluated.
As a result of the statistical analysis in which measurements of the study group and control group were compared, a statistically significant difference was found in the following values: pre-treatment group COHb level (p<0.001), PR interval (p=0.046), PP interval (p<0.001), QT interval (p<0.001), QTC interval (p=0.016), RR interval (p<0.001), and post-treatment group COHb level (p<0.001), PR interval (p=0.009), PP interval (p=0.041), QTC interval (p=0.010), and RR interval (p=0.036). QT interval values in the post-treatment group were similar to those of the control group (p=0.342). In the ROC analysis where the diagnostic performance of ECG intervals was evaluated, the area under the curve (AUC) scale was between 0.29 and 0.62.
ECG intervals do not provide as much benefit as COHb measurement in the diagnosis of acute CO poisoning. However, the QT interval is a useful ECG interval in the treatment monitoring of acute CO poisoning. Key Words: Acute carbonmonoxide poisoning, ECG interval, QT interval, Emergency Department.
评估心电图(ECG)间期在急性一氧化碳(CO)中毒的诊断和治疗监测中的可用性。
观察性研究。
土耳其开塞利市医院急诊科,2018 年 11 月至 2019 年 5 月。
前瞻性纳入 80 例患者作为研究组和对照组。对研究组患者进行治疗前后心电图间期(P 波及 QRS 复合间期、PP、PR、RR、QT 和 QTc 间期)和碳氧血红蛋白(COHb)水平评估。对对照组患者入院时的心电图间期和 COHb 水平进行评估。
对研究组和对照组的测量值进行统计学分析,发现以下值存在统计学显著差异:治疗前组 COHb 水平(p<0.001)、PR 间期(p=0.046)、PP 间期(p<0.001)、QT 间期(p<0.001)、QTC 间期(p=0.016)、RR 间期(p<0.001),以及治疗后组 COHb 水平(p<0.001)、PR 间期(p=0.009)、PP 间期(p=0.041)、QTC 间期(p=0.010)、RR 间期(p=0.036)。治疗后组的 QT 间期值与对照组相似(p=0.342)。在评估心电图间期诊断性能的 ROC 分析中,曲线下面积(AUC)介于 0.29 至 0.62 之间。
与 COHb 测量相比,心电图间期在急性 CO 中毒的诊断中提供的帮助不大。然而,QT 间期是急性 CO 中毒治疗监测中有用的心电图间期。
急性一氧化碳中毒;心电图间期;QT 间期;急诊科。