Pharmacy Department, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.
Departament de Farmacologia, de Terapèutica i de Toxicologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Nov;28(Suppl 2):e185-e190. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002601. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
To estimate the cost of the hospital pharmacy's participation in clinical trials (CTs) and to compare it to the amount received in compensation from sponsors.To analyse the financial impact of CTs that end without recruiting any patients and without any financial compensation from promoters.
This retrospective observational study analysed data from 5 years (2014-2018) at a tertiary university hospital.We established an allocation formula taking into account direct costs related to the pharmacy department's CT area's activity (reception, safekeeping, preparation, devolution, and destruction of medication, as well as patient monitoring) and indirect costs (facilities, resources, support staff). We calculated the costs to the department and the compensation received both overall and based on the type of promoter, clinical department involved in the trial, and the number of patients included.
We included 134 trials. Costs added up to €207 372.95 and the compensation to €149 128.93 (€58 244.02 loss for the department). Trials ending without recruiting patients (33.6%) and without compensation accounted for 57.45% of the deficit. The mean cost of trials ending without recruiting patients was €875. We plan to charge a reimbursable setup fee for opening CTs to safeguard against these losses (€875 for trials in all departments except oncology; €1100 for oncology because 38% of their trials end without recruiting patients) and to compensate for the costs incurred in participating in trials for cooperative groups without financial compensation (20%).
Billing sponsors based on costs incurred for each trial would be a fairer system than the current approach based on the number of patients included. Establishing an initial fee would make up for losses from trials that fail to recruit any patients.
评估医院药房参与临床试验(CT)的成本,并将其与从赞助商处获得的补偿金额进行比较。分析无患者招募且无赞助商提供经济补偿的 CT 试验的财务影响。
本回顾性观察性研究分析了一所三级大学医院 5 年(2014-2018 年)的数据。我们制定了一个分配公式,考虑到与药房部门 CT 活动相关的直接成本(接收、保管、准备、分发和药物销毁,以及患者监测)和间接成本(设施、资源、支持人员)。我们计算了部门的成本和收到的补偿,包括总体补偿和根据赞助商类型、参与试验的临床科室以及纳入患者的数量进行的补偿。
我们纳入了 134 项试验。成本总计 207372.95 欧元,补偿为 149128.93 欧元(部门损失 58244.02 欧元)。无患者招募且无补偿的试验占赤字的 57.45%。无患者招募的试验的平均成本为 875 欧元。我们计划收取可退还的 CT 启动费用,以防范这些损失(除肿瘤学外,所有科室的试验费用为 875 欧元;肿瘤学为 1100 欧元,因为 38%的试验无患者招募),并补偿参与无经济补偿合作组试验的成本(20%)。
基于每项试验的成本向赞助商收费将比目前基于纳入患者数量的方法更公平。建立初始费用将弥补因无患者招募而导致的试验损失。