Meeks Lisa M, Case Ben, Stergiopoulos Erene, Evans Brianna K, Petersen Kristina H
Department of Psychiatry, The University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Department of Family Medicine, The University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2021 May 26;8:23821205211018696. doi: 10.1177/23821205211018696. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
Leaders in medical education have expressed a commitment to increase medical student diversity, including those with disabilities. Despite this commitment there exists a large gap in the number of medical students self-reporting disability in anonymous demographic surveys and those willing to disclose and request accommodations at a school level. Structural elements for disclosing and requesting disability accommodations have been identified as a main barrier for students with disabilities in medical education, yet school-level practices for student disclosure at US-MD programs have not been studied.
In August 2020, a survey seeking to ascertain institutional disability disclosure structure was sent to student affairs deans at LCME fully accredited medical schools. Survey responses were coded according to their alignment with considerations from the AAMC report on disability and analyzed for any associations with the AAMC Organizational Characteristics Database and class size.
Disability disclosure structures were collected for 98 of 141 eligible schools (70% response rate). Structures for disability disclosure varied among the 98 respondent schools. Sixty-four (65%) programs maintained a disability disclosure structure in alignment with AAMC considerations; 34 (35%) did not. No statistically significant relationships were identified between disability disclosure structures and AAMC organizational characteristics or class size.
Thirty-five percent of LCME fully accredited MD program respondents continue to employ structures of disability disclosure that do not align with the considerations offered in the AAMC report. This structural non-alignment has been identified as a major barrier for medical students to accessing accommodations and may disincentivize disability disclosure. Meeting the stated calls for diversity will require schools to consider structural barriers that marginalize students with disabilities and make appropriate adjustments to their services to improve access.
医学教育领域的领导者已承诺增加医学生的多样性,包括残疾学生。尽管有此承诺,但在匿名人口统计学调查中自我报告残疾的医学生数量与愿意在学校层面披露并申请便利条件的学生数量之间仍存在巨大差距。披露和申请残疾便利条件的结构因素已被确定为残疾学生接受医学教育的主要障碍,但美国医学博士项目中学校层面学生披露情况的做法尚未得到研究。
2020年8月,一项旨在确定机构残疾披露结构的调查被发送给医学教育联络委员会(LCME)完全认证医学院的学生事务主任。调查回复根据其与美国医学协会(AAMC)关于残疾问题报告中的考虑因素的一致性进行编码,并分析其与AAMC组织特征数据库和班级规模的任何关联。
在141所符合条件的学校中,有98所(回复率70%)收集了残疾披露结构。98所回复学校的残疾披露结构各不相同。64个(65%)项目维持了与AAMC考虑因素一致的残疾披露结构;34个(35%)项目没有。在残疾披露结构与AAMC组织特征或班级规模之间未发现统计学上的显著关系。
医学教育联络委员会完全认证的医学博士项目中,35%的回复者继续采用与AAMC报告中提出的考虑因素不一致的残疾披露结构。这种结构上的不一致已被确定为医学生获得便利条件的主要障碍,可能会抑制残疾披露。要实现所宣称的多样性目标,学校需要考虑那些使残疾学生处于边缘地位的结构障碍,并对其服务进行适当调整,以改善获取机会。