Suppr超能文献

氯沙坦与接受化疗的转移性胰腺癌患者预后的关联

Association of losartan with outcomes in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients treated with chemotherapy.

作者信息

Kasi Anup, Allen Jessica, Mehta Kathan, Dandawate Prasad, Saha Subhrajit, Bossmann Stefan, Anant Shrikant, Sun Weijing

机构信息

University of Kansas Medical Center Division of Medical Oncology, Kansas, USA.

University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Res. 2021 Mar 24;7(2):257-262. eCollection 2021 Apr 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous trials have shown improved efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment when combined with angiotensin II receptor antagonist, losartan in patients with locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). However, role of losartan is unknown in metastatic PDA. In this retrospective observational study, we examined the relationship between losartan use at time of diagnosis and continued through chemotherapy treatment with clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic PDA that received chemotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 114 metastatic PDA patients treated at University of Kansas Cancer Center between January 2000 and November 2019. We compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) between patients using losartan at time of their cancer diagnosis and a control group of patients who were not on losartan. A subgroup analysis was performed based on patients who were on a 100 mg dose of losartan along with chemotherapy versus patients treated with chemotherapy (without losartan). Another subgroup analysis was performed based on chemotherapy regimen: Fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) versus Gemcitabine and Abraxane.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found in OS (p=0.466) or PFS (p=0.919) in patients on losartan (median 274 day, 83 day) and control patients (median 279 day, 111 day). No significant difference was found in ORR (p=0.621) or in DCR (p=0.497). No significant difference was found in OS (p=0.771) or PFS (p=0.0604) in losartan patients (median 347 day, 350 day) and control patients (median 333 day, 101 day) treated with FOLFIRINOX. No significant difference was found in OS (p=0.916) or PFS (p=0.341) in losartan (median 312 day, 69 day) and control patients (median 221 day, 136 day) treated with Gemcitabine plus Abraxane. No significant difference was found in OS (p=0.727) or PFS (p=0.790) in 100 mg losartan patients (median 261 day, 84 day) and control (median 279 day, 111 day).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients on losartan at time of diagnosis and continued through chemotherapy treatment had no significant difference in OS, PFS, ORR, DCR than control patients. Subgroup analysis of patients treated with FOLFIRINOX revealed a longer PFS with losartan than control but did not reach statistical significance, likely due to small sample size. Our findings should be validated in a larger cohort to confirm if the benefit of losartan and FOLFIRINOX seen in a neoadjuvant setting for locally advanced cancer also applies to metastatic cancer.

RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS

This research adds to growing data on the efficacy of angiotensin receptor blocking drugs as adjunctive treatment in addition to chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer with specific focus on metastatic disease.

摘要

背景

既往试验表明,在局部晚期胰腺导管腺癌(PDA)患者中,新辅助治疗联合血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂氯沙坦时疗效有所提高。然而,氯沙坦在转移性PDA中的作用尚不清楚。在这项回顾性观察研究中,我们探讨了转移性PDA患者诊断时使用氯沙坦并持续至化疗治疗与临床结局之间的关系,这些患者均接受了化疗。

方法

我们回顾性评估了2000年1月至2019年11月在堪萨斯大学癌症中心接受治疗的114例转移性PDA患者。我们比较了癌症诊断时使用氯沙坦的患者与未使用氯沙坦的对照组患者的总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)。基于服用100 mg氯沙坦联合化疗的患者与接受化疗(未使用氯沙坦)的患者进行了亚组分析。基于化疗方案进行了另一亚组分析:氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙、奥沙利铂和伊立替康(FOLFIRINOX)方案与吉西他滨和白蛋白结合型紫杉醇方案。

结果

使用氯沙坦的患者(中位生存期274天,83天)与对照组患者(中位生存期279天,111天)在OS(p=0.466)或PFS(p=0.919)方面未发现显著差异。在ORR(p=0.621)或DCR(p=0.497)方面也未发现显著差异。接受FOLFIRINOX治疗的氯沙坦患者(中位生存期347天,350天)与对照组患者(中位生存期333天,101天)在OS(p=0.771)或PFS(p=0.0604)方面未发现显著差异。接受吉西他滨加白蛋白结合型紫杉醇治疗的氯沙坦患者(中位生存期312天,69天)与对照组患者(中位生存期221天,136天)在OS(p=0.916)或PFS(p=0.341)方面未发现显著差异。服用100 mg氯沙坦的患者(中位生存期261天,84天)与对照组(中位生存期279天,111天)在OS(p=0.727)或PFS(p=0.790)方面未发现显著差异。

结论

诊断时使用氯沙坦并持续至化疗治疗的患者在OS、PFS、ORR和DCR方面与对照组患者无显著差异。对接受FOLFIRINOX治疗的患者进行的亚组分析显示,使用氯沙坦的患者PFS长于对照组,但未达到统计学意义,可能是由于样本量小。我们的研究结果应在更大的队列中进行验证,以确认在局部晚期癌症新辅助治疗中看到的氯沙坦和FOLFIRINOX的益处是否也适用于转移性癌症。

对患者的意义

这项研究增加了越来越多的数据表明,血管紧张素受体阻断药物作为胰腺癌化疗辅助治疗的疗效,特别关注转移性疾病。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19cd/8177858/aceb856de56c/jclintranslres-2021-7-2-257-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验