Suppr超能文献

羟氯喹和阿奇霉素对住院治疗的 COVID-19 肺炎患者无效:一项回顾性研究。

Lack of efficacy of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia: A retrospective study.

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Groupe Hospitalier Intercommunal Le Raincy-Montfermeil, Montfermeil, France.

Pneumology Department, Groupe Hospitalier Intercommunal Le Raincy-Montfermeil, Montfermeil, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jun 9;16(6):e0252388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252388. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hydroxychloroquine combined with azithromycin (HCQ/AZI) has initially been used against coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). In this retrospective study, we assessed the clinical effects of HCQ/AZI, with a 28-days follow-up.

METHODS

In a registry-study which included patients hospitalized for COVID-19 between March 15 and April 2, 2020, we compared patients who received HCQ/AZI to those who did not, regarding a composite outcome of mortality and mechanical ventilation with a 28-days follow-up. QT was monitored for patients treated with HCQ/AZI. Were excluded patients in intensive care units, palliative care and ventilated within 24 hours of admission. Three analyses were performed to adjust for selection bias: propensity score matching, multivariable survival, and inverse probability score weighting (IPSW) analyses.

RESULTS

Overall, 203 patients were included: 60 patients treated by HCQ/AZI and 143 control patients. During the 28-days follow-up, 32 (16.3%) patients presented the primary outcome and 23 (12.3%) patients died. Propensity-score matching identified 52 unique pairs of patients with similar characteristics. In the matched cohort (n = 104), HCQ/AZI was not associated with the primary composite outcome (log-rank p-value = 0.16). In the overall cohort (n = 203), survival and IPSW analyses also found no benefit from HCQ/AZI. In the HCQ/AZI group, 11 (18.3%) patients prolonged QT interval duration, requiring treatment cessation.

CONCLUSIONS

HCQ/AZI combination therapy was not associated with lower in-hospital mortality and mechanical ventilation rate, with a 28-days follow-up. In the HCQ/AZI group, 18.3% of patients presented a prolonged QT interval requiring treatment cessation, however, control group was not monitored for this adverse event, making comparison impossible.

摘要

背景

羟氯喹联合阿奇霉素(HCQ/AZI)最初被用于治疗 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)。在这项回顾性研究中,我们评估了 HCQ/AZI 的临床疗效,随访时间为 28 天。

方法

在一项包括 2020 年 3 月 15 日至 4 月 2 日期间因 COVID-19 住院的患者的登记研究中,我们比较了接受 HCQ/AZI 治疗和未接受 HCQ/AZI 治疗的患者在 28 天随访时的死亡率和机械通气的复合结局。对接受 HCQ/AZI 治疗的患者进行了 QT 监测。排除了在重症监护病房、姑息治疗和入院后 24 小时内接受通气的患者。为了调整选择偏差,进行了三种分析:倾向评分匹配、多变量生存和逆概率评分加权(IPSW)分析。

结果

共纳入 203 例患者:60 例接受 HCQ/AZI 治疗,143 例为对照组。在 28 天随访期间,32 例(16.3%)患者出现主要结局,23 例(12.3%)患者死亡。倾向评分匹配确定了 52 对具有相似特征的独特患者。在匹配队列(n=104)中,HCQ/AZI 与主要复合结局无关(对数秩检验 p 值=0.16)。在总队列(n=203)中,生存分析和 IPSW 分析也未发现 HCQ/AZI 有获益。在 HCQ/AZI 组中,11 例(18.3%)患者 QT 间期延长,需要停药。

结论

在 28 天随访时,HCQ/AZI 联合治疗与较低的住院死亡率和机械通气率无关。在 HCQ/AZI 组中,18.3%的患者出现需要停药的 QT 间期延长,但对照组未监测到这种不良事件,因此无法进行比较。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bcc/8189518/4316d41e73bb/pone.0252388.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验