Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Health Industry Management, School of Healthcare Management, Kainan University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
J Formos Med Assoc. 2021 Jun;120 Suppl 1:S95-S105. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2021.05.020. Epub 2021 May 25.
Vaccine is supposed to be the most effective means to prevent COVID-19 as it may not only save lives but also reduce productivity loss due to resuming pre-pandemic activities. Providing the results of economic evaluation for mass vaccination is of paramount importance for all stakeholders worldwide.
We developed a Markov decision tree for the economic evaluation of mass vaccination against COVID-19. The effectiveness of reducing outcomes after the administration of three COVID-19 vaccines (BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), mRNA-1273 (Moderna), and AZD1222 (Oxford-AstraZeneca)) were modelled with empirical parameters obtained from literatures. The direct cost of vaccine and COVID-19 related medical cost, the indirect cost of productivity loss due to vaccine jabs and hospitalization, and the productivity loss were accumulated given different vaccination scenarios. We reported the incremental cost-utility ratio and benefit/cost (B/C) ratio of three vaccines compared to no vaccination with a probabilistic approach.
Moderna and Pfizer vaccines won the greatest effectiveness among the three vaccines under consideration. After taking both direct and indirect costs into account, all of the three vaccines dominated no vaccination strategy. The results of B/C ratio show that one dollar invested in vaccine would have USD $13, USD $23, and USD $28 in return for Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca, respectively when health and education loss are considered. The corresponding figures taking value of the statistical life into account were USD $176, USD $300, and USD $443.
Mass vaccination against COVID-19 with three current available vaccines is cost-saving for gaining more lives and less cost incurred.
疫苗被认为是预防 COVID-19 的最有效手段,因为它不仅可以挽救生命,还可以减少因恢复大流行前的活动而导致的生产力损失。为大规模疫苗接种提供经济评估结果对全球所有利益相关者都至关重要。
我们为 COVID-19 大规模疫苗接种的经济评估开发了一个马尔可夫决策树。使用从文献中获得的经验参数对三种 COVID-19 疫苗(BNT162b2(辉瑞-生物科技)、mRNA-1273(莫德纳)和 AZD1222(牛津-阿斯利康))接种后减少结果的效果进行建模。疫苗和 COVID-19 相关医疗费用的直接成本、因疫苗接种和住院而导致的生产力损失的间接成本以及生产力损失在不同的疫苗接种方案下累积。我们报告了与不接种疫苗相比,三种疫苗的增量成本-效用比和效益/成本(B/C)比采用概率方法。
在考虑的三种疫苗中,莫德纳和辉瑞疫苗的效果最佳。在考虑直接和间接成本后,三种疫苗均优于不接种疫苗策略。B/C 比的结果表明,当考虑健康和教育损失时,每投资一美元于疫苗,莫德纳、辉瑞和阿斯利康的回报分别为 13 美元、23 美元和 28 美元。考虑到统计生命价值的情况下,相应的数字分别为 176 美元、300 美元和 443 美元。
用三种现有的疫苗对 COVID-19 进行大规模疫苗接种可节省成本,从而获得更多的生命和更少的成本支出。