Augustovski Federico, Bardach Ariel, Santoro Adrián, Rodriguez-Cairoli Federico, López-Osornio Alejandro, Argento Fernando, Havela Maissa, Blumenfeld Alejandro, Ballivian Jamile, Solioz Germán, Capula Analía, López Analía, Cejas Cintia, Savedoff William, Palacios Alfredo, Rubinstein Adolfo, Pichon-Riviere Andrés
Departamento de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias y Economía de la Salud/Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics Department/ Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS)/Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Dr. Emilio Ravignani 2024 (C1014CPV), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Centro de Implementación e Innovación en Políticas de Salud (CIIPS). Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS)/Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Apr 1;21(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00430-2.
Our study analyzes the cost-effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccination campaigns in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Mexico, and Peru.
Using a previously published SVEIR model, we analyzed the impact of a vaccination campaign (2021) from a national healthcare perspective. The primary outcomes were quality adjusted life years (QALYs) lost and total costs. Other outcomes included COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, deaths, and life years. We applied a discount rate of 3% for health outcomes. We modeled a realistic vaccination campaign in each country (the realistic country-specific campaign). Additionally, we assessed a standard campaign (similar, "typical" for all countries), and an optimized campaign (similar in all countries with higher but plausible population coverage). One-way deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed.
Vaccination was health improving as well as cost-saving in almost all countries and scenarios. Our analysis shows that vaccination in this group of countries prevented 573,141 deaths (508,826 standard; 685,442 optimized) and gained 5.07 million QALYs (4.53 standard; 6.03 optimized). Despite the incremental costs of vaccination campaigns, they had a total net cost saving to the health system of US$16.29 billion (US$16.47 standard; US$18.58 optimized). The realistic (base case) vaccination campaign in Chile was the only scenario, which was not cost saving, but it was still highly cost-effective with an ICER of US$22 per QALY gained. Main findings were robust in the sensitivity analyses.
The COVID-19 vaccination campaign in seven Latin American and Caribbean countries -that comprise nearly 80% of the region- was beneficial for population health and was also cost-saving or highly cost-effective.
我们的研究分析了阿根廷、巴西、智利、哥伦比亚、哥斯达黎加、墨西哥和秘鲁开展的新冠疫苗接种运动的成本效益。
我们使用先前发表的SVEIR模型,从国家医疗保健角度分析了2021年疫苗接种运动的影响。主要结果是质量调整生命年(QALY)损失和总成本。其他结果包括新冠病例、住院、死亡和生命年。我们对健康结果应用了3%的贴现率。我们为每个国家模拟了一次现实的疫苗接种运动(针对特定国家的现实运动)。此外,我们评估了一次标准运动(对所有国家来说类似、“典型”)和一次优化运动(在所有国家中类似,但人口覆盖率更高且合理)。进行了单向确定性敏感性分析。
在几乎所有国家和情景中,疫苗接种都改善了健康状况并节省了成本。我们的分析表明,在这组国家中,疫苗接种预防了573,141例死亡(标准情况为508,826例;优化情况为685,442例),并获得了507万个QALY(标准情况为453万个;优化情况为603万个)。尽管疫苗接种运动成本有所增加,但它们为卫生系统节省了总计162.9亿美元的净成本(标准情况为164.7亿美元;优化情况为185.8亿美元)。智利的现实(基础情况)疫苗接种运动是唯一不节省成本的情景,但它仍然具有很高的成本效益,每获得一个QALY的增量成本效益比为22美元。主要结果在敏感性分析中很稳健。
在占该地区近80%的七个拉丁美洲和加勒比国家开展的新冠疫苗接种运动对人群健康有益,并且具有成本节约或高成本效益。