Schooneveldt G P, Moore B C
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, England.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 Jun;83(6):2290-2. doi: 10.1121/1.396359.
These experiments were intended to determine whether comodulation masking release (CMR) occurs for maskers that are modulated in frequency rather than in amplitude. In experiment I, thresholds for a sinusoidal signal were measured in the presence of two continuous sinusoidal maskers: one was centered at the signal frequency (1.0 kHz), and the other was positioned at flanking frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 kHz. The two maskers were frequency modulated (FM) by the same low-pass-noise modulator (correlated condition) or by independent noise modulators (uncorrelated condition). Thresholds were the same for the correlated and uncorrelated maskers, i.e., no CMR occurred. This was also true when the flanking band was presented in the ear opposite to that containing the signal and the on-frequency masking band. In experiment II, 25-Hz-wide noise maskers were used. The on-frequency band was sinusoidally frequency modulated, while the off-frequency band either had the same FM or no FM. Thresholds were similar for the two conditions, again indicating that no CMR occurred. The results suggest that, unlike amplitude modulation, correlated FM of the masker in different frequency bands does not give rise to a release from masking.
这些实验旨在确定对于在频率而非幅度上进行调制的掩蔽声,是否会出现共调制掩蔽释放(CMR)。在实验I中,在两个连续正弦掩蔽声存在的情况下测量正弦信号的阈值:一个以信号频率(1.0 kHz)为中心,另一个位于0.5至2.0 kHz的侧翼频率处。这两个掩蔽声由同一个低通噪声调制器进行频率调制(相关条件)或由独立的噪声调制器进行频率调制(不相关条件)。相关掩蔽声和不相关掩蔽声的阈值相同,即未出现CMR。当侧翼频段在与包含信号和同频掩蔽频段相对的耳中呈现时,情况也是如此。在实验II中,使用了25 Hz宽的噪声掩蔽声。同频频段进行正弦频率调制,而异频频段要么具有相同的调频,要么不进行调频。两种条件下的阈值相似,再次表明未出现CMR。结果表明,与幅度调制不同,不同频段掩蔽声的相关调频不会导致掩蔽解除。