Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Unit of Hand Surgery, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp -EPM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Hospital Municipal Dr. Fernando Mauro Pires da Rocha (Hospital do Campo Limpo), São Paulo, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0252667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252667. eCollection 2021.
For displaced distal radius fracture, this trial aimed to compare an above-elbow (AE) and below-elbow (BE) cast at the end of a 24-week follow-up using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire as a primary outcome.
This is a clinical trial with parallel groups (1:1) and a blinded evaluator. There are two non-surgical interventions: AE and BE. A total of 128 adult patients with acute (up to 7 days) displaced distal radius fracture of type A2-3, C1-3 by the AO classification were included. The follow-up was 24 weeks. The primary outcome was the DASH questionnaire at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes were the maintenance of reduction by the evaluation of radiographic parameters, pain measured by VAS, PRWE, objective functional evaluation and rate of adverse effects.
The difference between the two groups in the DASH score at 24 weeks was not significant, with the mean (95% CI) DASH score being AE: 9.44 (2.70 to 16.17) vs. BE: 9.88 (3.19 to 16.57) (p = 0.895). The above-elbow group had a significantly greater worsening of the mean DASH score from baseline to 2 weeks (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups in any of the other follow-up assessments. Objective functional evaluation, PRWE, radiographical measures and rates of reduction loss were similar between groups. Above-elbow casting resulted in more adverse effects (mostly shoulder pain; 19 events vs. 9 events); RR = 0.39 (0.19-0.94); p = 0.033 at the end of six-month follow-up.
This study did not demonstrate a difference between above-elbow and below-elbow cast in terms of DASH outcome at 6 months in non-surgical treatment of deviated distal radius fractures. However, below-elbow casting is less debilitating during the treatment period, has comparable performance in maintaining the reduction, and is related to fewer minor adverse effects than above-elbow casting.
对于桡骨远端移位骨折,本试验旨在比较 24 周随访结束时的肘上(AE)和肘下(BE)石膏固定,以残疾前臂、肩和手(DASH)问卷作为主要结局。
这是一项具有平行组(1:1)和盲法评估员的临床试验。有两种非手术干预措施:AE 和 BE。共纳入 128 例急性(7 天内)AO 分类 A2-3、C1-3 型桡骨远端移位骨折的成年患者。随访 24 周。主要结局为 24 周时 DASH 问卷。次要结局为通过评估影像学参数、VAS 测量疼痛、PRWE、客观功能评估和不良反应发生率来维持复位。
两组在 24 周时 DASH 评分的差异无统计学意义,AE 组的平均(95%CI)DASH 评分:9.44(2.70 至 16.17),BE 组:9.88(3.19 至 16.57)(p=0.895)。AE 组从基线到 2 周时 DASH 评分的平均恶化程度明显更大(p<0.001)。两组在任何其他随访评估中均无统计学差异。客观功能评估、PRWE、影像学测量和复位丢失率在两组之间相似。肘上石膏固定的不良反应发生率较高(主要为肩部疼痛;19 例 vs. 9 例);RR=0.39(0.19-0.94);p=0.033,在 6 个月随访结束时。
本研究未显示在非手术治疗桡骨远端骨折中,6 个月时肘上和肘下石膏固定在 DASH 结局方面存在差异。然而,肘下石膏固定在治疗期间的致残性较小,在维持复位方面的表现相当,且与肘上石膏固定相比,不良反应发生率较低。