Research Unit for Psychotherapy and Psychopathology, Mental Health Service West, Copenhagen University Hospital, Psychiatry Region Zealand, Slagelse, Denmark.
Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Psychother Psychosom. 2022;91(1):36-49. doi: 10.1159/000516380. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) delivered in a group format could facilitate the implementation of evidence-based psychological treatments.
This study compared the efficacy of group UP and diagnosis-specific cognitive behavioral therapy (dCBT) for anxiety and depression in outpatient mental health services.
In this pragmatic, multi-center, single-blinded, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial (RCT), we assigned 291 patients with major depressive disorder, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, or agoraphobia to 14 weekly sessions in mixed-diagnosis UP or single-diagnosis dCBT groups. The primary test was non-inferiority, using a priori criteria, on the World Health Organisation 5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5) at the end of the treatment. Secondary outcomes were functioning and symptoms. We assessed outcomes at baseline, end-of-treatment, and at a 6-month follow-up. A modified per-protocol analysis was performed.
At end-of-treatment, WHO-5 mean scores for patients in UP (n = 148) were non-inferior to those of patients in dCBT (n = 143; mean difference -2.94; 95% CI -8.10 to 2.21). Results were inconclusive for the WHO-5 at the 6-month follow-up. Results for secondary outcomes were non-inferior at end-of-treatment and the 6-month follow-up. Client satisfaction and rates of attrition, response, remission, and deterioration were similar across conditions.
This RCT demonstrated non-inferior acute-phase outcomes of group-delivered UP compared with dCBT for major depressive disorder, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, and agoraphobia in outpatient mental health services. The long-term effects of UP on well-being need further investigation. If study findings are replicated, UP should be considered a viable alternative to dCBT for common anxiety disorders and depression in outpatient mental health services.
针对情绪障碍的统一治疗方案(UP)以团体形式提供,可促进基于证据的心理治疗的实施。
本研究比较了团体 UP 和针对特定诊断的认知行为疗法(dCBT)在门诊心理健康服务中治疗焦虑和抑郁的疗效。
在这项实用、多中心、单盲、非劣效、随机对照试验(RCT)中,我们将 291 名患有重度抑郁症、社交焦虑症、惊恐障碍或广场恐惧症的患者分配到混合诊断 UP 或单一诊断 dCBT 组,共进行 14 周的治疗。主要测试是使用事先设定的标准,在治疗结束时,采用世界卫生组织 5 项幸福感指数(WHO-5)作为非劣效性测试。次要结果为功能和症状。我们在基线、治疗结束时和 6 个月随访时评估了结果。进行了修改后的意向治疗分析。
在治疗结束时,UP 组(n = 148)的 WHO-5 平均评分与 dCBT 组(n = 143)相当;差异为-2.94(95%CI-8.10 至 2.21)。在 6 个月随访时,WHO-5 的结果不确定。治疗结束和 6 个月随访时,次要结局的结果也不确定。在不同治疗条件下,患者满意度和脱落率、反应率、缓解率和恶化率相似。
本 RCT 表明,与 dCBT 相比,门诊心理健康服务中,针对重度抑郁症、社交焦虑症、惊恐障碍和广场恐惧症的团体 UP 治疗在急性期的疗效相当。UP 对幸福感的长期影响需要进一步研究。如果研究结果得到复制,UP 应被视为门诊心理健康服务中常见焦虑症和抑郁症的 dCBT 的可行替代方案。