Suppr超能文献

广泛性焦虑障碍与特异性诊断的团体认知行为治疗比较:一项随机对照试验

Transdiagnostic versus Diagnosis-Specific Group Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety Disorders and Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Research Unit for Psychotherapy and Psychopathology, Mental Health Service West, Copenhagen University Hospital, Psychiatry Region Zealand, Slagelse, Denmark.

Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Psychother Psychosom. 2022;91(1):36-49. doi: 10.1159/000516380. Epub 2021 Jun 10.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) delivered in a group format could facilitate the implementation of evidence-based psychological treatments.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the efficacy of group UP and diagnosis-specific cognitive behavioral therapy (dCBT) for anxiety and depression in outpatient mental health services.

METHODS

In this pragmatic, multi-center, single-blinded, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial (RCT), we assigned 291 patients with major depressive disorder, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, or agoraphobia to 14 weekly sessions in mixed-diagnosis UP or single-diagnosis dCBT groups. The primary test was non-inferiority, using a priori criteria, on the World Health Organisation 5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5) at the end of the treatment. Secondary outcomes were functioning and symptoms. We assessed outcomes at baseline, end-of-treatment, and at a 6-month follow-up. A modified per-protocol analysis was performed.

RESULTS

At end-of-treatment, WHO-5 mean scores for patients in UP (n = 148) were non-inferior to those of patients in dCBT (n = 143; mean difference -2.94; 95% CI -8.10 to 2.21). Results were inconclusive for the WHO-5 at the 6-month follow-up. Results for secondary outcomes were non-inferior at end-of-treatment and the 6-month follow-up. Client satisfaction and rates of attrition, response, remission, and deterioration were similar across conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

This RCT demonstrated non-inferior acute-phase outcomes of group-delivered UP compared with dCBT for major depressive disorder, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, and agoraphobia in outpatient mental health services. The long-term effects of UP on well-being need further investigation. If study findings are replicated, UP should be considered a viable alternative to dCBT for common anxiety disorders and depression in outpatient mental health services.

摘要

简介

针对情绪障碍的统一治疗方案(UP)以团体形式提供,可促进基于证据的心理治疗的实施。

目的

本研究比较了团体 UP 和针对特定诊断的认知行为疗法(dCBT)在门诊心理健康服务中治疗焦虑和抑郁的疗效。

方法

在这项实用、多中心、单盲、非劣效、随机对照试验(RCT)中,我们将 291 名患有重度抑郁症、社交焦虑症、惊恐障碍或广场恐惧症的患者分配到混合诊断 UP 或单一诊断 dCBT 组,共进行 14 周的治疗。主要测试是使用事先设定的标准,在治疗结束时,采用世界卫生组织 5 项幸福感指数(WHO-5)作为非劣效性测试。次要结果为功能和症状。我们在基线、治疗结束时和 6 个月随访时评估了结果。进行了修改后的意向治疗分析。

结果

在治疗结束时,UP 组(n = 148)的 WHO-5 平均评分与 dCBT 组(n = 143)相当;差异为-2.94(95%CI-8.10 至 2.21)。在 6 个月随访时,WHO-5 的结果不确定。治疗结束和 6 个月随访时,次要结局的结果也不确定。在不同治疗条件下,患者满意度和脱落率、反应率、缓解率和恶化率相似。

结论

本 RCT 表明,与 dCBT 相比,门诊心理健康服务中,针对重度抑郁症、社交焦虑症、惊恐障碍和广场恐惧症的团体 UP 治疗在急性期的疗效相当。UP 对幸福感的长期影响需要进一步研究。如果研究结果得到复制,UP 应被视为门诊心理健康服务中常见焦虑症和抑郁症的 dCBT 的可行替代方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验