Suppr超能文献

跨诊断团体认知行为疗法与标准团体认知行为疗法治疗抑郁症、社交焦虑障碍和广场恐惧症/惊恐障碍:一项实用、多中心非劣效性随机对照试验的研究方案

Transdiagnostic group CBT vs. standard group CBT for depression, social anxiety disorder and agoraphobia/panic disorder: Study protocol for a pragmatic, multicenter non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Arnfred Sidse M, Aharoni Ruth, Hvenegaard Morten, Poulsen Stig, Bach Bo, Arendt Mikkel, Rosenberg Nicole K, Reinholt Nina

机构信息

Psychiatric Hospital Slagelse & Psychiatric Research Unit, Region Zealand Psychiatry, Faelledvej 6, Building 3, Level 4., DK-4200, Slagelse, Denmark.

Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 23;17(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1175-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transdiagnostic Cognitive Behavior Therapy (TCBT) manuals delivered in individual format have been reported to be just as effective as traditional diagnosis specific CBT manuals. We have translated and modified the "The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders" (UP-CBT) for group delivery in Mental Health Service (MHS), and shown effects comparable to traditional CBT in a naturalistic study. As the use of one manual instead of several diagnosis-specific manuals could simplify logistics, reduce waiting time, and increase therapist expertise compared to diagnosis specific CBT, we aim to test the relative efficacy of group UP-CBT and diagnosis specific group CBT.

METHODS/DESIGN: The study is a partially blinded, pragmatic, non-inferiority, parallel, multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) of UP-CBT vs diagnosis specific CBT for Unipolar Depression, Social Anxiety Disorder and Agoraphobia/Panic Disorder. In total, 248 patients are recruited from three regional MHS centers across Denmark and included in two intervention arms. The primary outcome is patient-ratings of well-being (WHO Well-being Index, WHO-5), secondary outcomes include level of depressive and anxious symptoms, personality variables, emotion regulation, reflective functioning, and social adjustment. Assessments are conducted before and after therapy and at 6 months follow-up. Weekly patient-rated outcomes and group evaluations are collected for every session. Outcome assessors, blind to treatment allocation, will perform the observer-based symptom ratings, and fidelity assessors will monitor manual adherence.

DISCUSSION

The current study will be the first RCT investigating the dissemination of the UP in a MHS setting, the UP delivered in groups, and with depressive patients included. Hence the results are expected to add substantially to the evidence base for rational group psychotherapy in MHS. The planned moderator and mediator analyses could spur new hypotheses about mechanisms of change in psychotherapy and the association between patient characteristics and treatment effect.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02954731 . Registered 25 October 2016.

摘要

背景

据报道,以个体形式提供的跨诊断认知行为疗法(TCBT)手册与传统的针对特定诊断的认知行为疗法手册一样有效。我们已经翻译并修改了《情绪障碍跨诊断治疗统一方案》(UP-CBT),以便在心理健康服务(MHS)中以团体形式提供,并在一项自然主义研究中显示出与传统认知行为疗法相当的效果。由于使用一本手册而非几本针对特定诊断的手册,与针对特定诊断的认知行为疗法相比,可简化后勤工作、减少等待时间并提高治疗师的专业水平,我们旨在测试团体UP-CBT与针对特定诊断的团体认知行为疗法的相对疗效。

方法/设计:该研究是一项部分盲法、实用、非劣效性、平行、多中心随机对照试验(RCT),比较UP-CBT与针对单相抑郁症、社交焦虑症和广场恐怖症/惊恐障碍的特定诊断认知行为疗法。总共从丹麦的三个地区心理健康服务中心招募了248名患者,并将其纳入两个干预组。主要结局是患者的幸福感评分(世界卫生组织幸福感指数,WHO-5),次要结局包括抑郁和焦虑症状水平、人格变量、情绪调节、反思功能和社会适应。在治疗前后以及6个月随访时进行评估。每次治疗时收集患者每周的评分结果和团体评估。对治疗分配不知情的结局评估者将进行基于观察的症状评分,保真度评估者将监测手册的依从性。

讨论

当前的研究将是第一项在心理健康服务环境中调查UP传播情况的随机对照试验,该研究采用团体形式提供UP,并纳入了抑郁症患者。因此,预计研究结果将大大增加心理健康服务中合理团体心理治疗的证据基础。计划中的调节因素和中介因素分析可能会激发有关心理治疗变化机制以及患者特征与治疗效果之间关联的新假设。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02954731。2016年10月25日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c804/5260024/5525470a7006/12888_2016_1175_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验