Hovmand Oliver Rumle, Falkenström Fredrik, Reinholt Nina, Bryde Anne, Eskildsen Anita, Arendt Mikkel, Poulsen Stig, Hvenegaard Morten, Arnfred Sidse M, Bach Bo Sayyad
Psychiatric Research Unit, Region Zealand Mental Health Service, Slagelse, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
BMC Psychol. 2025 Sep 2;13(1):1002. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03167-0.
Homework is integral to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) treatment programs. Previous research has reported mostly positive findings regarding the effect of homework adherence on CBT outcomes, but only limited research has evaluated the effect in transdiagnostic CBT (tCBT).
This secondary study used data from 164 patients with major depressive disorder, social phobia, agoraphobia, or panic disorder, randomized to 14 sessions of diagnosis-specific CBT (dCBT) in groups or group tCBT (Unified Protocol). The number of times patients engaged in homework assignments was measured with a single-item homework engagement assessment. We evaluated the effects of total mean homework engagement on symptom outcomes using the Hopkins Symptom Checklist at the end of therapy, and the effect of intervention arm and diagnosis on homework engagement across three periods with repeated measures analysis of variance. Finally, we used cross-lagged panel modeling (CLPM), with the inclusion of baseline covariates and interaction variables, to investigate whether homework engagement predicted next-session symptom severity as measured with the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale and the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale.
Patients' general homework engagement significantly affected their symptoms at end of treatment (F: 3.944, p = 0.05), and had a significant cross-lagged effect on next-week symptoms (coefficient = - 0.23, se = 0.11, z = -2.16, p = 0.03, 95% CI [-0.44, - 0.02]). Initial analysis indicated that homework engagement was higher in dCBT than in the UP, and patients with depression in dCBT conditions were more engaged in homework assignments in the first period of therapy. However, these differences did not affect the overall treatment outcome in repeated measures or CLPM analyses.
This is the first study to examine the effects of homework engagement on symptoms in group UP and also adds to the limited literature using such methods to isolate the unique effects of treatment engagement on symptom outcomes. Future studies should confirm these results and investigate other relevant aspects of homework engagement, such as the quality of said engagement and process variables such as therapist factors, group cohesion, and negative effects of homework assignments.
家庭作业是认知行为疗法(CBT)治疗方案不可或缺的一部分。先前的研究大多报告了家庭作业依从性对CBT治疗效果的积极影响,但仅有有限的研究评估了其在跨诊断CBT(tCBT)中的作用。
这项二次研究使用了164例患有重度抑郁症、社交恐惧症、广场恐惧症或惊恐障碍患者的数据,这些患者被随机分配到14节特定诊断的CBT(dCBT)小组治疗或小组tCBT(统一方案)。通过一项单项家庭作业参与度评估来测量患者完成家庭作业的次数。我们使用治疗结束时的霍普金斯症状清单评估了家庭作业总平均参与度对症状结果的影响,并通过重复测量方差分析评估了干预组和诊断对三个阶段家庭作业参与度的影响。最后,我们使用交叉滞后面板模型(CLPM),纳入基线协变量和交互变量,以研究家庭作业参与度是否能预测下一次治疗时使用总体抑郁严重程度和损害量表以及总体焦虑严重程度和损害量表所测量的症状严重程度。
患者的总体家庭作业参与度在治疗结束时对其症状有显著影响(F:3.944,p = 0.05),并且对下周症状有显著的交叉滞后效应(系数 = -0.23,标准误 = 0.11,z = -2.16,p = 0.03,95%可信区间[-0.44,-0.02])。初步分析表明,dCBT中的家庭作业参与度高于统一方案组,并且在dCBT条件下的抑郁症患者在治疗的第一阶段更积极参与家庭作业任务。然而,这些差异在重复测量或CLPM分析中并未影响总体治疗结果。
这是第一项研究小组统一方案中家庭作业参与度对症状影响的研究,并且也增加了使用此类方法来分离治疗参与度对症状结果独特影响的有限文献。未来的研究应证实这些结果,并调查家庭作业参与度的其他相关方面,例如参与度的质量以及诸如治疗师因素、小组凝聚力和家庭作业任务负面影响等过程变量。