Suppr超能文献

与传统敷料相比,使用氰基丙烯酸酯胶水固定外周短静脉导管:一项随机对照试验。

Short peripheral intravenous catheter securement with cyanoacrylate glue compared to conventional dressing: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Bahl Amit, Gibson S Matthew, Jankowski David, Chen Nai-Wei

机构信息

Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Access. 2023 Jan;24(1):52-63. doi: 10.1177/11297298211024037. Epub 2021 Jun 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Short peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) fail prior to completion of therapy in up to 63% of hospitalizations. This unacceptably high rate of failure has become the norm for the most common invasive procedure in all of medicine. Securement strategies may improve PIVC survival.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, single-site, parallel, two-arm randomized controlled investigation with a primary outcome of catheter failure comparing securement with standard semi-permeable dressing and clear tape (SPD) to standard semipermeable dressing and clear tape with cyanoacrylate glue (SPD + CG). Adult emergency department patients with a short PIVC and anticipated hospital duration ⩾ 48 h were enrolled and followed until IV failure or completion of therapy for up to 7 days. Secondary outcomes included complications and cost comparisons between groups. Primary outcome was assessed by intention to treat and per protocol analyses.

FINDINGS

350 patients were enrolled between November 2019 and October 2020. PIVC survival for SPD + CG was similar to SPD group with the absolute risk difference of IV failure in the intention-to-treat (-5.8%,  = 0.065) population and improved in the per protocol (-8.1%,  = 0.04) population, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated there was a significant benefit of the SPD + CG at greater than 2 days of hospitalization ( = 0.04). Prior to 48 h, there was no survival enhancement to either group ( = 0.98) in the intention to treat population. In a multivariable analysis with piecewise Cox regression, when the IV was functional greater than 48 h, the risk of IV failure in the SPD + CG was 43% less than the SPD group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34 to 0.97;  = 0.04). Cumulative cost related to IV during hospitalization was similar between groups with a lower incremental rescue cost in the SPD + CG group.

INTERPRETATION

SPD combined with cyanoacrylate glue provides similar benefit to patients compared to SPD alone and potentially improves short PIVC survival when the IV was inserted >48 h. As this strategy is cost neutral, it could be considered in admitted patients, particularly those with longer anticipated hospital durations.

摘要

背景

在高达63%的住院治疗中,短期外周静脉导管(PIVC)在治疗完成前就会失败。这种高得令人无法接受的失败率已成为整个医学领域最常见侵入性操作的常态。固定策略可能会提高PIVC的留存率。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性、单中心、平行、双臂随机对照研究,主要结局为导管失败,比较使用标准半透膜敷料和透明胶带(SPD)固定与使用标准半透膜敷料和透明胶带加氰基丙烯酸酯胶水(SPD + CG)固定的效果。纳入成年急诊科患者,其留置短期PIVC且预计住院时间≥48小时,随访至静脉输液失败或治疗结束,最长7天。次要结局包括两组之间的并发症和成本比较。主要结局通过意向性分析和符合方案分析进行评估。

结果

2019年11月至2020年10月期间共纳入350例患者。在意向性分析人群中,SPD + CG组的PIVC留存率与SPD组相似,静脉输液失败的绝对风险差异为-5.8%(P = 0.065);在符合方案分析人群中,SPD + CG组的PIVC留存率有所提高,静脉输液失败的绝对风险差异为-8.1%(P = 0.04)。Kaplan-Meier生存分析表明,住院超过2天时,SPD + CG组有显著优势(P = 0.04)。在48小时之前,在意向性分析人群中,两组的留存率均未提高(P = 0.98)。在多变量分段Cox回归分析中,当静脉输液功能维持超过48小时时,SPD + CG组静脉输液失败的风险比SPD组低43%(调整后风险比[HR] 0.57,95%置信区间[CI] 0.34至0.97;P = 0.04)。住院期间与静脉输液相关的累计成本在两组之间相似,SPD + CG组的额外抢救成本较低。

解读

与单独使用SPD相比,SPD联合氰基丙烯酸酯胶水给患者带来的益处相似,并且当静脉输液留置时间>48小时时,可能会提高短期PIVC的留存率。由于该策略成本相当,对于住院患者,尤其是那些预计住院时间较长的患者,可以考虑采用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验