• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与假设的不检测情况相比,当前西班牙 ALK 重排检测的临床和经济影响。

Clinical and economic impact of current ALK rearrangement testing in Spain compared with a hypothetical no-testing scenario.

机构信息

Catalan Institute of Oncology, Hospital Duran i Reynals, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.

Hospital Costa del Sol, Marbella, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2021 Jun 10;21(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08407-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-021-08407-1
PMID:34112097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8194132/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently biomarkers play an essential role in diagnosis, treatment, and management of cancer. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) determination of biomarkers such as ALK, EGFR, ROS1 or PD-L1 is mandatory for an adequate treatment decision. The aim of this study is to determine the clinical and economic impact of current anaplastic lymphoma kinase testing scenario in Spain.

METHODS

A joint model, composed by decision-tree and Markov models, was developed to estimate the long-term health outcomes and costs of NSCLC patients, by comparing the current testing scenario for ALK in Spain vs a hypothetical no-testing. The current distribution of testing strategies for ALK determination and their sensitivity and specificity data were obtained from the literature. Treatment allocation based on the molecular testing result were defined by a panel of Spanish experts. To assess long-term effects of each treatment, 3-states Markov models were developed, where progression-free survival and overall survival curves were extrapolated using exponential models. Medical direct costs (expressed in €, 2019) were included. A lifetime horizon was used and a discount rate of 3% was applied for both costs and health effects. Several sensitivity analyses, both deterministic and probabilistic, were performed in order test the robustness of the analysis.

RESULTS

We estimated a target population of 7628 NSCLC patients, including those with non-squamous histology and those with squamous carcinomas who were never smokers. Over the lifetime horizon, the current ALK testing scenario produced additional 5060 and 3906 life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), respectively, compared with the no-testing scenario. Total direct costs were increased up to € 51,319,053 for testing scenario. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 10,142 €/QALY. The sensitivity analyses carried out confirmed the robustness of the base-case results, being the treatment allocation and the test accuracy (sensitivity and specificity data) the key drivers of the model.

CONCLUSIONS

ALK testing in advanced NSCLC patients, non-squamous and never-smoker squamous, provides more than 3000 QALYs in Spain over a lifetime horizon. Comparing this gain in health outcomes with the incremental costs, the resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio reinforces that testing non-squamous and never-smoker squamous NSCLC is a cost-effective strategy in Spain.

摘要

背景

目前,生物标志物在癌症的诊断、治疗和管理中发挥着重要作用。在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中,确定ALK、EGFR、ROS1 或 PD-L1 等生物标志物对于做出适当的治疗决策是必要的。本研究旨在确定目前在西班牙间变性淋巴瘤激酶检测方案的临床和经济影响。

方法

采用决策树和马尔可夫模型联合模型,通过比较西班牙目前的 ALK 检测方案与假设的不检测方案,估计 NSCLC 患者的长期健康结果和成本。从文献中获得目前用于确定 ALK 的检测策略的分布及其敏感性和特异性数据。根据西班牙专家小组的定义,根据分子检测结果进行治疗分配。为了评估每种治疗方法的长期效果,开发了 3 状态马尔可夫模型,其中使用指数模型推断无进展生存期和总生存期曲线。包括医疗直接成本(以欧元表示,2019 年)。使用终生时间范围,并对成本和健康效果应用 3%的折扣率。进行了多次确定性和概率敏感性分析,以检验分析的稳健性。

结果

我们估计了 7628 名 NSCLC 患者的目标人群,包括非鳞状组织学和从不吸烟的鳞状癌患者。在终生时间范围内,与不检测方案相比,当前的 ALK 检测方案分别产生了额外的 5060 和 3906 个生命年和质量调整生命年(QALY)。检测方案的总直接成本增加了 5131.9053 万欧元。增量成本效益比为 10142 欧元/QALY。进行的敏感性分析证实了基础病例结果的稳健性,治疗分配和测试准确性(敏感性和特异性数据)是模型的关键驱动因素。

结论

在西班牙,对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者(非鳞状和从不吸烟的鳞状)进行 ALK 检测,在终生时间范围内可提供超过 3000 个 QALY。将这些健康结果的提高与增量成本进行比较,增量成本效益比证实了对非鳞状和从不吸烟的鳞状 NSCLC 进行检测是一种具有成本效益的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/017d/8194132/4d5fae061fe7/12885_2021_8407_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/017d/8194132/6257d304b507/12885_2021_8407_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/017d/8194132/2ec7d8abc7a6/12885_2021_8407_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/017d/8194132/dcbe8adc0d23/12885_2021_8407_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/017d/8194132/4d5fae061fe7/12885_2021_8407_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/017d/8194132/6257d304b507/12885_2021_8407_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/017d/8194132/2ec7d8abc7a6/12885_2021_8407_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/017d/8194132/dcbe8adc0d23/12885_2021_8407_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/017d/8194132/4d5fae061fe7/12885_2021_8407_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical and economic impact of current ALK rearrangement testing in Spain compared with a hypothetical no-testing scenario.与假设的不检测情况相比,当前西班牙 ALK 重排检测的临床和经济影响。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Jun 10;21(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08407-1.
2
Clinical and economic impact of 'ROS1-testing' strategy compared to a 'no-ROS1-testing' strategy in advanced NSCLC in Spain.在西班牙晚期非小细胞肺癌中,“ROS1检测”策略与“无ROS1检测”策略相比的临床和经济影响。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Mar 19;22(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09397-4.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line treatment with crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Canada.加拿大 ROS1 重排晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)一线克唑替尼治疗的成本效果分析。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Oct 29;21(1):1162. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08746-z.
4
Cost-effectiveness of ALK testing and first-line crizotinib therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer in China.中国非小细胞肺癌中 ALK 检测和一线克唑替尼治疗的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 23;13(10):e0205827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205827. eCollection 2018.
5
Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant atezolizumab versus best supportive care in the treatment of patients with resectable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer and overexpression of PD-L1.辅助性阿替利珠单抗对比最佳支持治疗用于治疗可切除的早期非小细胞肺癌且PD-L1过表达患者的成本效益
J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):445-453. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2188844.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care chemotherapy for first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive (>50%) metastatic squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in France.帕博利珠单抗对比标准治疗化疗用于 PD-L1 阳性(>50%)转移性鳞状和非鳞状非小细胞肺癌一线治疗的成本效果分析。在法国。
Lung Cancer. 2019 Jan;127:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
7
The cost-effectiveness of brigatinib in adult patients with ALK inhibitor-naive ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer from a US perspective.从美国视角评估布加替尼在未经ALK 抑制剂治疗的 ALK 阳性非小细胞肺癌成年患者中的成本效果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Sep;28(9):970-979. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.9.970.
8
The Cost-Effectiveness of Lorlatinib Versus Chemotherapy as a Second- or Third-Line Treatment in Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)-Positive Non-small-cell Lung Cancer in Sweden.在瑞典,洛拉替尼对比化疗作为间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)阳性非小细胞肺癌二线或三线治疗的成本效益。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Aug;39(8):941-952. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01015-8. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
9
Cost effectiveness of EML4-ALK fusion testing and first-line crizotinib treatment for patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.EML4-ALK 融合检测及一线克唑替尼治疗对晚期 ALK 阳性非小细胞肺癌患者的成本效果分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Apr 1;32(10):1012-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.1186. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
10
Ventana ALK (D5F3) in the Detection of Patients Affected by Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-positive Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer: Clinical and Budget Effect.检测间变性淋巴瘤激酶阳性非小细胞肺癌的 Ventana ALK (D5F3):临床和预算效果。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2018 Sep;19(5):e735-e743. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
The Cost Effectiveness of Genomic Medicine in Cancer Control: A Systematic Literature Review.基因组医学在癌症控制中的成本效益:一项系统文献综述。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 May;23(3):359-393. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00949-w. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
2
Towards Recommendations for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Predictive, Prognostic, and Serial Biomarker Tests in Oncology.肿瘤学中预测、预后和系列生物标志物检测的成本效益分析建议
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May;43(5):483-497. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01470-7. Epub 2025 Feb 8.
3
Shifting from Immunohistochemistry to Screen for Rearrangements: Real-World Experience in a Large Single-Center Cohort of Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
ALK Testing Trends and Patterns Among Community Practices in the United States.美国社区医疗机构中ALK检测的趋势与模式
JCO Precis Oncol. 2018 Nov;2:1-11. doi: 10.1200/PO.18.00159.
2
Economic Impact of Next-Generation Sequencing Versus Single-Gene Testing to Detect Genomic Alterations in Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Using a Decision Analytic Model.使用决策分析模型比较下一代测序与单基因检测在检测转移性非小细胞肺癌基因组改变中的经济影响
JCO Precis Oncol. 2019 Dec;3:1-9. doi: 10.1200/PO.18.00356.
3
Updated overall survival and final progression-free survival data for patients with treatment-naive advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in the ALEX study.
从免疫组化转向筛查重排:大型单中心非小细胞肺癌患者队列的真实世界经验
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jun 14;16(12):2219. doi: 10.3390/cancers16122219.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Next-Generation Sequencing Versus Single-Gene Testing for the Molecular Diagnosis of Patients With Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer From the Perspective of Spanish Reference Centers.西班牙参考中心从成本效益角度出发,对转移性非小细胞肺癌患者进行下一代测序与单基因检测的分子诊断比较
JCO Precis Oncol. 2023 Mar;7:e2200546. doi: 10.1200/PO.22.00546.
5
Clinical and economic impact of 'ROS1-testing' strategy compared to a 'no-ROS1-testing' strategy in advanced NSCLC in Spain.在西班牙晚期非小细胞肺癌中,“ROS1检测”策略与“无ROS1检测”策略相比的临床和经济影响。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Mar 19;22(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09397-4.
在 ALEX 研究中,未经治疗的晚期 ALK 阳性非小细胞肺癌患者的更新总生存和最终无进展生存数据。
Ann Oncol. 2020 Aug;31(8):1056-1064. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.478. Epub 2020 May 11.
4
Updated Analysis From KEYNOTE-189: Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Pemetrexed and Platinum for Previously Untreated Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.KEYNOTE-189 更新分析:帕博利珠单抗或安慰剂联合培美曲塞和铂类化疗用于未经治疗的转移性非鳞状非小细胞肺癌。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 10;38(14):1505-1517. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.03136. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
5
ALK inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.ALK 抑制剂治疗非小细胞肺癌:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 19;15(2):e0229179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229179. eCollection 2020.
6
Utility of incorporating next-generation sequencing (NGS) in an Asian non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) population: Incremental yield of actionable alterations and cost-effectiveness analysis.将下一代测序(NGS)纳入亚洲非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)人群的实用性:可操作改变的增量收益和成本效益分析。
Lung Cancer. 2020 Jan;139:207-215. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.11.022. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
7
Overall Survival with Osimertinib in Untreated, -Mutated Advanced NSCLC.奥希替尼治疗未经治、-突变型晚期 NSCLC 的总生存期。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 2;382(1):41-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1913662. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
8
Liquid biopsy tracking of lung tumor evolutions over time.液体活检追踪随时间推移的肺部肿瘤演变。
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2019 Dec;19(12):1099-1108. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2020.1680287. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
9
Updated guidelines for predictive biomarker testing in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a National Consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology.更新版晚期非小细胞肺癌预测性生物标志物检测指南:西班牙病理学会和西班牙肿瘤内科学会全国共识。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2020 Jul;22(7):989-1003. doi: 10.1007/s12094-019-02218-4. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
10
[What is an efficient health intervention in Spain in 2020?].[2020年西班牙有效的健康干预措施是什么?]
Gac Sanit. 2020 Mar-Apr;34(2):189-193. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Sep 24.