Suppr超能文献

非药物干预和疫苗在控制 COVID-19 传播方面的有效性:接种前后三个时期的说明。

Effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions and vaccine for containing the spread of COVID-19: Three illustrations before and after vaccination periods.

机构信息

Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Formos Med Assoc. 2021 Jun;120 Suppl 1:S46-S56. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2021.05.015. Epub 2021 May 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are few studies demonstrating how the effectiveness of various extents of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) before and after vaccination periods. The study aimed to demonstrate such an effectiveness in the alteration of the epidemic curves from theory to practice.

METHODS

The empirical data on the daily reported COVID-19 cases were extracted from open source. A computer simulation design in conjunction with the susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered (SEIR) type model was applied to evaluating confinement measures in Italy with adjustment for underreported cases; isolation and quarantine in Taiwan; and NPIs and vaccination in Israel.

RESULTS

In Italy scenario, the extents of confinement measures were 34% before the end of March and then scaled up to 70% after then. Both figures were reduced to 22-69% after adjusting for underreported cases. Approximately 44% of confinement measures were implemented in the second surge of pandemic in Italy. Fitting the observational data on Taiwan assuming the initial outbreak similar to Wuhan, China, 44% of isolation and quarantine were estimated before March 23rd, 2020. Isolation and quarantine were scaled up to 90% and at least 60% to contain community-acquired outbreaks from March 24th, 2020 onwards. Given 15% monthly vaccination rate from December 2020 in Israel, the effectiveness estimates of reducing the infected toll were 36%, 56%, and 85% for NPIs alone, vaccination alone, and both combined, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated how various NPIs stamp out and delay the epidemic curve of COVID-19. The optimal implementation of these NPIs has to be planned before wide vaccine uptake worldwide.

摘要

背景

几乎没有研究表明疫苗接种前后各种非药物干预(NPI)的效果。本研究旨在从理论到实践展示这种效果在改变流行曲线方面的作用。

方法

从公开来源提取了关于每日报告的 COVID-19 病例的经验数据。采用计算机模拟设计,结合易感-暴露-感染-恢复(SEIR)型模型,评估了意大利的限制措施,同时对漏报病例进行了调整;对台湾的隔离和检疫;以及以色列的 NPI 和疫苗接种。

结果

在意大利的情况下,3 月底前限制措施的程度为 34%,之后增加到 70%。这两个数字在调整漏报病例后分别降低到 22-69%。意大利第二次大流行期间大约实施了 44%的限制措施。假设最初的爆发与中国武汉相似,对台湾的观察数据进行拟合,估计在 2020 年 3 月 23 日之前有 44%的隔离和检疫措施。隔离和检疫措施增加到 90%,至少从 2020 年 3 月 24 日起将 60%的社区获得性疫情控制在 60%以下。考虑到 2020 年 12 月以色列每月 15%的疫苗接种率,单独实施 NPI、单独接种疫苗以及两者结合,减少感染人数的效果估计分别为 36%、56%和 85%。

结论

我们展示了各种 NPI 如何消除和延迟 COVID-19 的流行曲线。在全球广泛接种疫苗之前,必须计划好这些 NPI 的最佳实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b79/8148434/d6442593de55/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验