Suppr超能文献

[创伤与骨科手术中的虚拟会诊]

[Virtual consultations in Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery].

作者信息

González Moreno M, Reboso Morales L E, Martín Hidalgo A Y, Kesserwan H M, García Bello M Á

机构信息

Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España.

Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España.

出版信息

Semergen. 2021 Jul-Aug;47(5):305-314. doi: 10.1016/j.semerg.2021.03.009. Epub 2021 Jun 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to analyse the current system of virtual consultations between the levels of Primary and Specialised Care in the field of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery (TOS) in our healthcare area.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A retrospective observational study was carried out on 90 consecutive patients who had a non-face-to-face consultation between 3 January 2017 and 10 February 2017 and subsequently a face-to-face consultation. All the patients belonged to the same healthcare area attached to the Nuestra Señora de Candelaria University Hospital. The data on the diagnostic orientation, medical history provided and complementary tests were evaluated by 2 observers, one with training in Family and Community Medicine and the other with specialised training in TOS, and compared with those obtained in the final face-to-face assessment.

RESULTS

The results showed a low inter-judge agreement regarding the diagnostic orientation, anamnesis, exploration and complementary tests provided in the virtual consultation request. It was considered that only 59% for one observer (Family and Community Medicine) and 47.7% for the other (specialised care) had sufficient information for decision-making. Furthermore, 35.2% required more than one face-to-face assessment consultation until diagnosis and in 45.5% it was necessary to request new complementary tests. In 30.7%, there was no concordance in the suggested and final diagnosis. In 51.9%, no therapeutic action other than that carried out by Primary Care was carried out and 34.1% of the patients were referred to the Rehabilitation department.

CONCLUSIONS

The current model of virtual consultations in TOS does not seem adequate to respond to this new healthcare model. The number of unnecessary referrals is very high despite the previous virtual assessment by a specialist in TOS. The Family and Community Medicine specialist should have more diagnostic resources and coordination between Primary and Specialised Care is necessary to determine, in the area of TOS, the type of consultations and conditions for which this system should be implemented to obtain adequate coordination and improve communication between both levels of care.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是分析我们医疗区域创伤与矫形外科(TOS)领域初级保健和专科保健层面之间当前的虚拟会诊系统。

材料与方法

对2017年1月3日至2017年2月10日期间连续进行非面对面会诊并随后进行面对面会诊的90例患者进行回顾性观察研究。所有患者均属于与坎德拉里亚圣母大学医院相关的同一医疗区域。由2名观察者对诊断方向、提供的病史和辅助检查数据进行评估,一名观察者接受过家庭与社区医学培训,另一名观察者接受过TOS专科培训,并将其与最终面对面评估中获得的数据进行比较。

结果

结果显示,在虚拟会诊请求中提供的诊断方向、病史、检查和辅助检查方面,评判者之间的一致性较低。据认为,一名观察者(家庭与社区医学)只有59%,另一名观察者(专科护理)只有47.7%拥有足够的信息用于决策。此外,35.2%的患者在确诊前需要不止一次面对面评估会诊,45.5%的患者需要重新进行辅助检查。在30.7%的病例中,建议诊断与最终诊断不一致。在51.9%的病例中,除初级保健采取的治疗措施外,未采取其他治疗措施,34.1%的患者被转诊至康复科。

结论

TOS领域当前的虚拟会诊模式似乎不足以应对这种新的医疗模式。尽管之前有TOS专科医生进行了虚拟评估,但不必要的转诊数量仍然很高。家庭与社区医学专科医生应拥有更多诊断资源,并且在TOS领域,初级保健和专科保健之间有必要进行协调,以确定应实施该系统的会诊类型和条件从而实现充分协调并改善两级医疗之间的沟通。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验