• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预计美国生态系统服务的损失将不成比例地影响非白人和低收入人群。

Projected losses of ecosystem services in the US disproportionately affect non-white and lower-income populations.

机构信息

Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.

Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2021 Jun 10;12(1):3511. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23905-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-021-23905-3
PMID:34112778
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8192915/
Abstract

Addressing how ecosystem services (ES) are distributed among groups of people is critical for making conservation and environmental policy-making more equitable. Here, we evaluate the distribution and equity of changes in ES benefits across demographic and socioeconomic groups in the United States (US) between 2020 and 2100. Specifically, we use land cover and population projections to model potential shifts in the supply, demand, and benefits of the following ES: provision of clean air, protection against a vector-borne disease (West Nile virus), and crop pollination. Across the US, changes in ES benefits are unevenly distributed among socioeconomic and demographic groups and among rural and urban communities, but are relatively uniform across geographic regions. In general, non-white, lower-income, and urban populations disproportionately bear the burden of declines in ES benefits. This is largely driven by the conversion of forests and wetlands to cropland and urban land cover in counties where these populations are expected to grow. In these locations, targeted land use policy interventions are required to avoid exacerbating inequalities already present in the US.

摘要

解决生态系统服务(ES)在人群中的分配问题对于使保护和环境决策更加公平至关重要。在这里,我们评估了美国(US)在 2020 年至 2100 年期间,人口统计和社会经济群体中 ES 利益变化的分布和公平性。具体而言,我们使用土地覆盖和人口预测模型来模拟以下 ES 的供应、需求和利益的潜在变化:提供清洁空气、预防媒介传播疾病(西尼罗河病毒)和作物授粉。在美国,ES 利益的变化在社会经济和人口统计群体以及农村和城市社区之间分布不均,但在地理区域之间相对均匀。一般来说,非白色、低收入和城市人口不成比例地承担着 ES 利益下降的负担。这主要是由于预计这些人口增长的县的森林和湿地向农田和城市土地覆盖的转变所致。在这些地方,需要有针对性的土地利用政策干预措施,以避免加剧美国已经存在的不平等现象。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94b0/8192915/2b75ad791d0b/41467_2021_23905_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94b0/8192915/663f912577f5/41467_2021_23905_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94b0/8192915/78760c5d60c5/41467_2021_23905_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94b0/8192915/7b0e6eb7dd55/41467_2021_23905_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94b0/8192915/2b75ad791d0b/41467_2021_23905_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94b0/8192915/663f912577f5/41467_2021_23905_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94b0/8192915/78760c5d60c5/41467_2021_23905_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94b0/8192915/7b0e6eb7dd55/41467_2021_23905_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94b0/8192915/2b75ad791d0b/41467_2021_23905_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Projected losses of ecosystem services in the US disproportionately affect non-white and lower-income populations.预计美国生态系统服务的损失将不成比例地影响非白人和低收入人群。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jun 10;12(1):3511. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23905-3.
2
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
3
The impacts of land use change on flood protection services among multiple beneficiaries.土地利用变化对多个受益者的防洪服务的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 1;806(Pt 2):150577. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150577. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
4
Spatiotemporal patterns and drivers of ecosystem service supply and demand across the conterminous United States: A multiscale analysis.美国本土生态系统服务供给与需求的时空格局及驱动因素:多尺度分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Feb 10;703:135005. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135005. Epub 2019 Nov 3.
5
Evaluating the relative impact of climate and economic changes on forest and agricultural ecosystem services in mountain regions.评估气候和经济变化对山区森林和农业生态系统服务的相对影响。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Nov 15;129:414-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.07.018. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
6
Assessing potential ecosystem service dynamics driven by urbanization in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China.评估中国长江经济带城市化驱动的潜在生态系统服务动态。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Aug 15;292:112734. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112734. Epub 2021 May 10.
7
Current and historical land use influence soil-based ecosystem services in an urban landscape.当前和历史土地利用对城市景观中的土壤基生态系统服务产生影响。
Ecol Appl. 2018 Apr;28(3):643-654. doi: 10.1002/eap.1689. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
8
The relationship between ecosystem service supply and demand in plain areas undergoing urbanization: A case study of China's Baiyangdian Basin.平原区城市化过程中生态系统服务供需关系:以中国白洋淀流域为例。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jul 1;289:112492. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112492. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
9
Quantitative assessment of land use/land cover changes on the value of ecosystem services in the coastal landscape of Anzali International Wetland.定量评估安扎利国际湿地沿海景观土地利用/土地覆被变化对生态系统服务价值的影响。
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Oct 30;191(11):694. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7802-8.
10
Quantifying ecosystem service mismatches for land use planning: spatial-temporal characteristics and novel approach-a case study in Jiangsu Province, China.量化土地利用规划中的生态系统服务错配:时空特征与新方法——以中国江苏省为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(18):26483-26497. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17764-0. Epub 2021 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Private management of African protected areas improves wildlife and tourism outcomes but with security concerns in conflict regions.私营管理的非洲保护区改善了野生动物和旅游业的发展成果,但在冲突地区存在安全隐患。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jul 16;121(29):e2401814121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2401814121. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
2
How human health and well-being depends on healthy marine habitats in the Mediterranean: A review.人类健康与福祉如何依赖地中海健康的海洋栖息地:综述
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 9;10(2):e24329. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24329. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Global trends in nature's contributions to people.全球自然对人类的贡献趋势。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 22;117(51):32799-32805. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010473117. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
2
Spatiotemporal patterns and drivers of ecosystem service supply and demand across the conterminous United States: A multiscale analysis.美国本土生态系统服务供给与需求的时空格局及驱动因素:多尺度分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Feb 10;703:135005. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135005. Epub 2019 Nov 3.
3
Managed retreat through voluntary buyouts of flood-prone properties.
通过自愿购买洪水多发地区的房产来实现有管理的撤离。
Sci Adv. 2019 Oct 9;5(10):eaax8995. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax8995. eCollection 2019 Oct.
4
Global modeling of nature's contributions to people.全球自然贡献评估模型
Science. 2019 Oct 11;366(6462):255-258. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw3372.
5
Spatiotemporal downscaling of global population and income scenarios for the United States.美国人口和收入情景的时空降尺度分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 24;14(7):e0219242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219242. eCollection 2019.
6
Inequity in consumption of goods and services adds to racial-ethnic disparities in air pollution exposure.商品和服务消费的不平等加剧了空气污染暴露方面的种族和民族差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 26;116(13):6001-6006. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818859116. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
7
Population projections for U.S. counties by age, sex, and race controlled to shared socioeconomic pathway.按年龄、性别和种族对美国各县的人口预测进行控制,以实现共享社会经济途径。
Sci Data. 2019 Feb 5;6:190005. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2019.5.
8
Assessing nature's contributions to people.评估自然对人类的贡献。
Science. 2018 Jan 19;359(6373):270-272. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8826.
9
Carbon dioxide emission-intensity in climate projections: Comparing the observational record to socio-economic scenarios.气候预测中的二氧化碳排放强度:将观测记录与社会经济情景进行比较。
Energy (Oxf). 2017 Sep 15;135:718-725. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.119.
10
Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States.估算美国气候变化造成的经济损失。
Science. 2017 Jun 30;356(6345):1362-1369. doi: 10.1126/science.aal4369.