Zhang Mingzi, Tupin Simon, Li Yujie, Ohta Makoto
Biomedical Flow Dynamics Laboratory, Institute of Fluid Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
ElyTMaX, CNRS-Université de Lyon-Tohoku University, International Joint Unit, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Front Physiol. 2021 May 25;12:663668. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.663668. eCollection 2021.
Treating intracranial aneurysms with flow-diverting stents sometimes requires deployment of a second device. Herein we quantify the sizing effects of devices in dual-stent treatments upon the final stent microstructure and the post-treatment aneurysmal haemodynamics.
Fifteen sidewall ICA aneurysm geometries were included. Using a virtual stenting technique, we implanted either one or two stents for each aneurysm treatment considered, with each stent specified as one of two different sizes, yielding a total of two single-stent and fouir dual-stent treatment scenarios for each aneurysm. Three stent microstructural parameters and nine aneurysmal haemodynamic parameters were quantified and systematically compared across the 90 treatment scenarios.
Deployment of a second stent further reduced the aneurysmal inflow rate (IR) and energy loss (EL) by, respectively, 14 ± 11% ( = 0.001) and 9 ± 12% ( = 0.056), relative to the untreated condition. Sizing effects of the earlier-deployed stent led to largest differences of 6.9% for the final IR reduction and 11.1% for the EL, whereas sizing effects from the later-deployed stent were minor (≤2.1%). The change in stent pore size was the only microstructural parameter demonstrating a strong correlation with the reduction in the post-treatment aneurysmal haemodynamics, in terms of the IR ( = 0.50, 0.001) and pressure drop ( = 0.63, 0.001).
Size of the earlier-deployed stent has substantial effects on the final haemodynamic outcomes after dual-stent treatment. The average pore size of stent wires at the aneurysm orifice shows promise as a potential index for predicting the efficacy of flow-diversion treatments.
使用血流导向支架治疗颅内动脉瘤有时需要植入第二个装置。在此,我们量化了双支架治疗中装置尺寸对最终支架微观结构和治疗后动脉瘤血流动力学的影响。
纳入15个颈内动脉侧壁动脉瘤模型。使用虚拟支架技术,针对每种考虑的动脉瘤治疗方案,我们植入一个或两个支架,每个支架指定为两种不同尺寸之一,每个动脉瘤共有两种单支架和四种双支架治疗方案。在90种治疗方案中,对三个支架微观结构参数和九个动脉瘤血流动力学参数进行了量化并系统比较。
相对于未治疗状态,植入第二个支架可使动脉瘤流入率(IR)和能量损失(EL)分别进一步降低14±11%(P = 0.001)和9±12%(P = 0.056)。较早植入支架的尺寸效应导致最终IR降低的最大差异为6.9%,EL为11.1%,而较晚植入支架的尺寸效应较小(≤2.1%)。支架孔径的变化是唯一与治疗后动脉瘤血流动力学降低密切相关的微观结构参数,在IR方面(P = 0.50,P < 0.001)和压降方面(P = 0.63,P < 0.001)。
较早植入支架的尺寸对双支架治疗后的最终血流动力学结果有重大影响。动脉瘤口处支架丝的平均孔径有望作为预测血流导向治疗效果的潜在指标。