Rodriguez Montesdeoca Isaura, Ramos de Miguel Angel, González Juan Carlos Falcon, Barreiro Silvia Borkoski, Pérez Fernández Nicolás, Vanspauwen Robby, Ramos-Macias Angel
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain.
Hearing and Balance Laboratory, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria University (SIANI), Las Palmas, Spain.
Front Neurol. 2021 May 25;12:663803. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.663803. eCollection 2021.
Several studies have demonstrated the possibility to obtain vestibular potentials elicited with electrical stimulation from cochlear and vestibular implants. The objective of this study is to analyze the vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) obtained from patients implanted with cochlear and vestibulo-cochlear implant. We compared two groups: in the first group, four cochlear implant (CI) recipients with present acoustic cVEMPs before CI surgery were included. In the second group, three patients with bilaterally absent cVEMPs and bilateral vestibular dysfunction were selected. The latter group received a unilateral cochleo-vestibular implant. We analyze the electrically elicited cVEMPs in all patients after stimulation with cochlear and vestibular electrode array stimulation. We present the results obtained post-operatively in both groups. All patients (100%) with direct electrical vestibular stimulation the vestibular electrode array had present cVEMPs. The P1 and N1 latencies were 11.33-13.6 ms and 18.3-21 ms, respectively. In CI patients, electrical cVEMPs were present only in one of the four subjects (25%) with cochlear implant ("cross") stimulation, and P1 and N1 latencies were 9.67 and 16.33, respectively. In these patients, the responses present shorter latencies than those observed acoustically. Electrically evoked cVEMPs can be present after cochlear and vestibular stimulation and suggest stimulation of vestibular elements, although clinical effect must be further studied.
多项研究已证明,通过对人工耳蜗和前庭植入物进行电刺激来获得前庭电位是有可能的。本研究的目的是分析人工耳蜗和人工耳蜗-前庭联合植入患者所获得的前庭诱发肌源性电位(VEMPs)。我们比较了两组:第一组纳入了4名在人工耳蜗植入手术前存在听觉性cVEMPs的人工耳蜗(CI)接受者。第二组选择了3名双侧听觉性cVEMPs缺失且双侧前庭功能障碍的患者。后一组接受了单侧耳蜗-前庭植入。我们在所有患者中,通过人工耳蜗和前庭电极阵列刺激进行电刺激后,分析电诱发的cVEMPs。我们展示了两组术后获得的结果。所有接受前庭电极阵列直接电前庭刺激的患者(100%)均存在cVEMPs。P1和N1潜伏期分别为11.33 - 13.6毫秒和18.3 - 21毫秒。在人工耳蜗患者中,仅4名接受人工耳蜗(“交叉”)刺激的受试者中的1名(25%)存在电cVEMPs,P1和N1潜伏期分别为9.67和16.33。在这些患者中,这些反应的潜伏期比听觉观察到的潜伏期短。耳蜗和前庭刺激后可出现电诱发的cVEMPs,提示前庭元件受到刺激,尽管其临床效果仍需进一步研究。