Stoeckel Florian, Carter Charlie, Lyons Benjamin A, Reifler Jason
University of Exeter, United Kingdom.
London School of Economics, United Kingdom.
Vaccine. 2021 Jun 29;39(29):3935-3939. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.062. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
While previous studies have validated vaccine hesitancy scales with uptake behavior at the individual level, the conditions under which aggregated survey data are useful are less clear. We show that vaccine public opinion data aggregated at the subnational level can serve as a valid indicator of aggregate vaccine behaviour. We use a public opinion survey (Eurobarometer EB 91.2) with data on vaccine hesitancy for the EU in 2019. We link this information to (subnational) regional immunization coverage rates for childhood vaccines - DTP3, MCV1, and MCV2 -- obtained from the WHO for 2019. We conduct multilevel regression analyses with data for 177 regions in 20 countries. Given the variation in vaccine hesitancy and immunization rates between countries and within countries, we affirm the valuable role that surveys can play as a public health surveillance tool when it comes to vaccine behavior. We find statistically significantly lower regional vaccine immunization rates in regions where vaccine hesitancy is more pronounced. Our results suggest that different uptake rates across subnational regions are due, at least in part, to differences in attitudes towards vaccines and vaccination. The results are robust to several alternative specifications.
虽然先前的研究已在个体层面验证了疫苗犹豫量表与接种行为的相关性,但汇总调查数据在何种情况下有用尚不清楚。我们表明,在国家以下层面汇总的疫苗民意数据可作为总体疫苗行为的有效指标。我们使用了一项民意调查(欧洲晴雨表EB 91.2),其中包含2019年欧盟疫苗犹豫情况的数据。我们将这些信息与从世界卫生组织获取的2019年儿童疫苗(白百破三联疫苗第三剂、第一剂麻疹风疹联合疫苗和第一剂麻疹腮腺炎风疹联合疫苗)的(国家以下层面)区域免疫覆盖率相联系。我们对20个国家177个地区的数据进行了多层次回归分析。鉴于各国之间以及各国国内疫苗犹豫情况和免疫率存在差异,我们肯定了在疫苗行为方面,调查作为公共卫生监测工具可发挥的重要作用。我们发现,在疫苗犹豫情况更明显的地区,区域疫苗免疫率在统计学上显著较低。我们的结果表明,国家以下各地区不同的接种率至少部分归因于对疫苗和接种态度的差异。这些结果在几种替代设定下都很稳健。