From the Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation-Médecine PériOpératoire (G.S., A.B., J.D.M., D.B.), Groupe Hospitalo-Universitaire, Paris-Saclay, AP-HP; and Centre de Simulation LabForSIMS de la Faculté de Médecine Paris-Saclay (G.S., A.B., J.D.M., D.B.), EA4532, UFR STAPS, Université Paris-Saclay CIAMS, Orsay, CIAMS, Université d'Orléans, Orléans, France.
Simul Healthc. 2022 Feb 1;17(1):e75-e82. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000584.
The growing number of learners implies that all of them cannot play an active role during high-fidelity scenarios. Studies suggest a positive educational value when learners are observers only, but it remains uncertain whether learning outcomes might be improved by using an observer tool (OT).
Eighty-nine anesthesia residents were randomized to use an OT (n = 44, OT+; based on a cognitive aid) or not (n = 45, OT-) when not role-playing. The main outcome parameter was the learning outcomes assessed by comparing the change (before-after) in the response score to a questionnaire dedicated to medical knowledge obtained in the OT+ and OT- groups. The impact of using the OT was also assessed by measuring the perceived stress level and the change of the Anesthetists' Non-Technical Skill items values.
At the end of the session, the mean medical knowledge score (mean ± SD) was higher in the OT+ group than in the OT- group (11.4 ± 2.7 vs. 9.6 ± 2.4, respectively, P = 0.0008). The mean Anesthetists' Non-Technical Skill score and level of stress perceived did not differ between groups. Trainees rated similarly the learning value and satisfaction related to the simulation course.
This study suggests that observing high-fidelity simulation scenarios using an OT based on a cognitive aid increases the medical knowledge gain when compared with that seen in passive observers. This study suggests that the use of an OT improves the educational value of simulation.
学习者人数的增加意味着并非所有学习者都能在高保真场景中发挥积极作用。研究表明,学习者仅作为观察者时具有积极的教育价值,但仍不确定使用观察工具(OT)是否可以提高学习效果。
89 名麻醉住院医师被随机分为使用 OT 组(n=44,OT+;基于认知辅助工具)和不使用 OT 组(n=45,OT-)。主要观察指标是通过比较 OT+和 OT-组在专门用于医学知识的问卷中回答得分的变化(前后)来评估学习效果。还通过测量感知压力水平和麻醉师非技术技能项目值的变化来评估使用 OT 的影响。
在课程结束时,OT+组的平均医学知识得分(均值±标准差)高于 OT-组(分别为 11.4±2.7 和 9.6±2.4,P=0.0008)。OT+组和 OT-组的麻醉师非技术技能得分和感知压力水平无差异。学员对模拟课程的学习价值和满意度评价相似。
本研究表明,与被动观察者相比,使用基于认知辅助工具的 OT 观察高保真模拟场景可增加医学知识的获取。本研究表明,使用 OT 可提高模拟教学的教育价值。