Havard Caroline, Jouffroy Viridiana, Gouez Agnès Le, Bruyère Marie, Figueiredo Samy, Roulleau Philippe, Benhamou Dan, Margat Aurore, Blanié Antonia
Centre de Simulation LabForSIMS, Département de Recherche et Innovation Pédagogique en Santé, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275, France.
Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, APHP, CHU Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, 94275, France.
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 20;25(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06608-3.
The use of an observer tool (OT) has been shown to improve learning of technical skills through observation in simulation. The objective was to assess the impact of a non-technical OT on anaesthesia residents' learning of non-technical skills (NTS) during simulation.
After consent, residents were randomised into 2 groups: OT+ (with an OT based on NTS to be systematically completed during observation of others) and OT- (without OT). Both groups observed a high-fidelity simulation of crisis management (with or without OT), then were asked to perform actively another simulation. The primary outcome was NTS performance, assessed by an evaluator using the Anaesthesia Non-Technical Skills score (ANTS score out of 16) on video recording. Secondary outcomes were results of score items, satisfaction, team performance, and professional impact.
No significant difference was found between OT + group (n = 33) and OT- group (n = 30) for the ANTS score (OT + 12 [9.5-12.5], OT- 10.5 [8.75-12]/16 (p = 0.13)). Among sub-items of the ANTS score, decision-making was significantly better in the OT + group (3 [2-3] versus 2 [2-3], p = 0.01). Satisfaction, team performance and perception of professional impact were not significantly different between groups.
This study showed no significant difference in learning of observational anaesthesia resident's NTS whether or not they were provided a non-technical OT during crisis management simulation. Decision-making was better with an OT. Further work is necessary to define the place of OT in observer-based learning.
已证明使用观察工具(OT)可通过模拟观察提高技术技能的学习效果。目的是评估一种非技术OT对麻醉住院医师在模拟过程中非技术技能(NTS)学习的影响。
获得同意后,将住院医师随机分为两组:OT+组(在观察他人时基于NTS系统地完成OT)和OT-组(不使用OT)。两组均观察了危机管理的高保真模拟(有或无OT),然后被要求主动进行另一次模拟。主要结局是NTS表现,由评估者通过视频记录使用麻醉非技术技能评分(ANTS评分,满分16分)进行评估。次要结局是评分项目的结果、满意度、团队表现和专业影响。
OT+组(n = 33)和OT-组(n = 30)的ANTS评分无显著差异(OT+组为12[9.5 - 12.5],OT-组为10.5[8.75 - 12]/16(p = 0.13))。在ANTS评分的子项目中,OT+组的决策明显更好(3[2 - 3]对2[2 - 3],p = 0.01)。两组之间的满意度、团队表现和专业影响感知无显著差异。
本研究表明,在危机管理模拟中,无论是否为麻醉住院医师提供非技术OT,他们在观察性NTS学习方面均无显著差异。使用OT时决策更好。有必要进一步开展工作以确定OT在基于观察的学习中的地位。