• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在高仿真模拟中使用观察工具提高麻醉住院医师非技术技能的学习:一项随机对照试验

Use of an observer tool to enhance learning of anaesthesia resident's non-technical skills during high-fidelity simulation: a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Havard Caroline, Jouffroy Viridiana, Gouez Agnès Le, Bruyère Marie, Figueiredo Samy, Roulleau Philippe, Benhamou Dan, Margat Aurore, Blanié Antonia

机构信息

Centre de Simulation LabForSIMS, Département de Recherche et Innovation Pédagogique en Santé, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275, France.

Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, APHP, CHU Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, 94275, France.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 20;25(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06608-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-06608-3
PMID:39833856
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11749093/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of an observer tool (OT) has been shown to improve learning of technical skills through observation in simulation. The objective was to assess the impact of a non-technical OT on anaesthesia residents' learning of non-technical skills (NTS) during simulation.

METHODS

After consent, residents were randomised into 2 groups: OT+ (with an OT based on NTS to be systematically completed during observation of others) and OT- (without OT). Both groups observed a high-fidelity simulation of crisis management (with or without OT), then were asked to perform actively another simulation. The primary outcome was NTS performance, assessed by an evaluator using the Anaesthesia Non-Technical Skills score (ANTS score out of 16) on video recording. Secondary outcomes were results of score items, satisfaction, team performance, and professional impact.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found between OT + group (n = 33) and OT- group (n = 30) for the ANTS score (OT + 12 [9.5-12.5], OT- 10.5 [8.75-12]/16 (p = 0.13)). Among sub-items of the ANTS score, decision-making was significantly better in the OT + group (3 [2-3] versus 2 [2-3], p = 0.01). Satisfaction, team performance and perception of professional impact were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed no significant difference in learning of observational anaesthesia resident's NTS whether or not they were provided a non-technical OT during crisis management simulation. Decision-making was better with an OT. Further work is necessary to define the place of OT in observer-based learning.

摘要

背景

已证明使用观察工具(OT)可通过模拟观察提高技术技能的学习效果。目的是评估一种非技术OT对麻醉住院医师在模拟过程中非技术技能(NTS)学习的影响。

方法

获得同意后,将住院医师随机分为两组:OT+组(在观察他人时基于NTS系统地完成OT)和OT-组(不使用OT)。两组均观察了危机管理的高保真模拟(有或无OT),然后被要求主动进行另一次模拟。主要结局是NTS表现,由评估者通过视频记录使用麻醉非技术技能评分(ANTS评分,满分16分)进行评估。次要结局是评分项目的结果、满意度、团队表现和专业影响。

结果

OT+组(n = 33)和OT-组(n = 30)的ANTS评分无显著差异(OT+组为12[9.5 - 12.5],OT-组为10.5[8.75 - 12]/16(p = 0.13))。在ANTS评分的子项目中,OT+组的决策明显更好(3[2 - 3]对2[2 - 3],p = 0.01)。两组之间的满意度、团队表现和专业影响感知无显著差异。

结论

本研究表明,在危机管理模拟中,无论是否为麻醉住院医师提供非技术OT,他们在观察性NTS学习方面均无显著差异。使用OT时决策更好。有必要进一步开展工作以确定OT在基于观察的学习中的地位。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d0/11749093/f1053b08f9f1/12909_2024_6608_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d0/11749093/f1053b08f9f1/12909_2024_6608_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d0/11749093/f1053b08f9f1/12909_2024_6608_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of an observer tool to enhance learning of anaesthesia resident's non-technical skills during high-fidelity simulation: a randomised controlled trial.在高仿真模拟中使用观察工具提高麻醉住院医师非技术技能的学习:一项随机对照试验
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 20;25(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06608-3.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
3
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
4
Epidural therapy for the treatment of severe pre-eclampsia in non labouring women.硬膜外治疗非分娩期妇女的重度子痫前期。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 28;11(11):CD009540. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009540.pub2.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
7
Intravenous versus inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia for postoperative cognitive outcomes in elderly people undergoing non-cardiac surgery.非心脏手术老年患者术后认知结局:静脉麻醉维持与吸入麻醉维持的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 21;8(8):CD012317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012317.pub2.
8
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Validating high-fidelity simulation for assessing procedural skills in nursing education: a kane framework approach in Ghana.验证高保真模拟在护理教育中评估操作技能的有效性:加纳的凯恩框架方法
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Aug 18;25(1):1170. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07724-4.

本文引用的文献

1
An observer tool to enhance learning of medical students during simulation training of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised controlled trial.一种观察者工具,用于增强医学生在心肺复苏模拟训练中的学习效果:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 3;24(1):719. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05658-x.
2
ABCDE: Directing Student Observation During High-Fidelity Simulation.ABCDE:在高保真模拟中指导学生观察
Med Sci Educ. 2020 Sep 24;30(4):1347-1349. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-01081-1. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
Use of an Observer Tool to Enhance Observers' Learning of Anesthesia Residents During High-Fidelity Simulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
使用观察者工具增强高保真模拟期间观察者对麻醉住院医师的学习:一项随机对照试验。
Simul Healthc. 2022 Feb 1;17(1):e75-e82. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000584.
4
Simulation-based teaching in critical care, anaesthesia and emergency medicine.重症监护、麻醉和急诊医学中的模拟教学。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2020 Apr;39(2):311-326. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
5
Comparing the Learning Effectiveness of Healthcare Simulation in the Observer Versus Active Role: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.比较观察者和主动者在医疗保健模拟中的学习效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Simul Healthc. 2019 Oct;14(5):318-332. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000377.
6
Cognitive Load Theory for debriefing simulations: implications for faculty development.用于模拟汇报的认知负荷理论:对教师发展的启示
Adv Simul (Lond). 2018 Dec 29;3:28. doi: 10.1186/s41077-018-0086-1. eCollection 2018.
7
Observer roles that optimise learning in healthcare simulation education: a systematic review.优化医疗模拟教育中学习效果的观察者角色:一项系统综述
Adv Simul (Lond). 2016 Jan 11;1:4. doi: 10.1186/s41077-015-0004-8. eCollection 2016.
8
Impact of learners' role (active participant-observer or observer only) on learning outcomes during high-fidelity simulation sessions in anaesthesia: A single center, prospective and randomised study.学习者角色(主动参与者-观察者或仅观察者)对麻醉高保真模拟课程学习成果的影响:一项单中心、前瞻性、随机研究。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2018 Oct;37(5):417-422. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2017.11.016. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
9
Differences in Learning Outcomes in Simulation: The observer role.模拟学习成果的差异:观察者角色。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2018 Jan;28:242-247. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2017.10.025. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
10
Simulation in Interprofessional Clinical Education: Exploring Validated Nontechnical Skills Measurement Tools.跨专业临床教育中的模拟:探索经过验证的非技术技能测量工具。
Simul Healthc. 2018 Apr;13(2):131-138. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000261.