Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Crescenz VAMC, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2021 Aug;45(8):1664-1671. doi: 10.1111/acer.14652. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
Although abstinence has traditionally been considered the only suitable outcome for alcohol treatment, reduced drinking is also associated with improved functioning and medical and psychiatric outcomes. The World Health Organization (WHO) risk drinking levels (RDLs) have been shown to be valid outcome measures in treatment trials for alcohol use disorder (AUD).
We conducted a secondary analysis of two 12-week, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), in which a total of 308 individuals with problematic alcohol use received topiramate or placebo treatment. We compared the utility of the WHO RDLs with other treatment outcomes, including self-reported measures of alcohol consumption, alcohol-related problems, and quality of life, and the biomarker gamma-glutamyltransferase.
Topiramate treatment was associated with small effect sizes for both a 1-level (d = 0.26) and a 2-level (d = 0.19) reduction in WHO RDL, effects that were not significant after correction for multiple comparisons. No heavy drinking days, one of the outcome measures recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration for alcohol medication registration trials, also exhibited a small effect (0.21), while an effect size for abstinence could not be calculated. There were medium effects of topiramate on continuous measures of percent heavy drinking days (d = 0.49) and alcohol-related problems (d = 0.41).
Topiramate is an efficacious pharmacotherapy for AUD. Although continuous measures of drinking and alcohol-related problems yielded larger effect sizes than the WHO RDLs, the latter nonetheless provide a categorical alternative for use in both clinical care and pharmacotherapy trials.
尽管戒酒传统上被认为是治疗酒精问题的唯一合适结果,但减少饮酒也与改善功能以及改善医疗和精神科结果有关。世界卫生组织(WHO)的危险饮酒水平(RDL)已被证明是酒精使用障碍(AUD)治疗试验中的有效结果衡量标准。
我们对两项为期 12 周的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了二次分析,共有 308 名有问题饮酒的个体接受了托吡酯或安慰剂治疗。我们比较了 WHO RDL 与其他治疗结果的效用,包括自我报告的饮酒量、与酒精相关的问题和生活质量以及生物标志物γ-谷氨酰转移酶。
托吡酯治疗与 WHO RDL 降低 1 级(d=0.26)和 2 级(d=0.19)相关,效果在经过多次比较校正后并不显著。没有重度饮酒天数,这是美国食品和药物管理局推荐的酒精药物注册试验的一种结果衡量标准,也显示出较小的效果(0.21),而戒酒的效果大小无法计算。托吡酯对连续测量的重度饮酒天数(d=0.49)和与酒精相关的问题(d=0.41)有中等效果。
托吡酯是一种有效的 AUD 药物治疗方法。尽管连续测量的饮酒和与酒精相关的问题产生的效果大小大于 WHO RDL,但后者仍然为临床护理和药物治疗试验提供了一种分类替代方法。