Suppr超能文献

中药注射剂联合奥司他韦治疗流感:系统评价与网状Meta分析

Traditional Chinese Medicine Injections Combined With Oseltamivir for Influenza: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Peng Yingying, Chen Zhe, Li Huanmin, Han Yaowei, Sun Dan, Li Yanjiao, Wu Xiaoxia, Chen Hongxiang, Li Xinmin

机构信息

First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.

National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jul 22;13:848770. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.848770. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

As a cause of respiratory tract infections in humans, influenza remains with high morbidity and mortality, with associated significant healthcare burden and increased financial burden. Traditional Chinese medicine injections (TCMIs) combined with oseltamivir (TCMIs + oseltamivir) are the representative therapeutic strategies for influenza, which is a compliant with clinical applications in China. The aim of this study was to describe the comparative efficacy and safety of TCMIs + oseltamivir in patients with influenza, based on the current evidence. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, VIP information resource integration service platform databases, and the Chinese biomedical literature service system were searched to find randomized controlled trials where TCMIs + oseltamivir are the representative therapeutic strategies for influenza, from inception until October 2021, without language restriction. Two investigators independently screened eligibility criteria, extracted data, and appraised the risk of bias with the same criteria. We conducted a network meta-analysis using the Bayesian random method for each outcome and performed the sensitivity analysis, meta-regression, and Egger's and Begg's tests for the reliability and robustness of our results. Thirty-one trials including 2,893 participants proved eligible and reported on four TCMIs + oseltamivir oseltamivir. Network meta-analysis showed Yanhuning (YHN) +oseltamivir (MD = -1.7, 95% CrI: -2.5 to -0.88; SUCRA = 0.89; low certainty of evidence) in fever disappearance time, Tanreqing (TRQ) +oseltamivir (MD = -1.9, 95% CrI: -2.8 to -1; SUCRA = 0.97; low certainty of evidence) in cough disappearance time, and Xiyanping (XYP) +oseltamivir (OR = 5.9, 95% CrI: 3.1 to 11; SUCRA = 0.82; very low certainty of evidence) in the response rate to be more efficacious than oseltamivir alone with the best SUCRA. Based on the combined SUCRA value for primary outcomes, TRQ + oseltamivir is probably better in cough disappearance time, and XYP + oseltamivir and YHN + oseltamivir may be better in fever disappearance time than others. No significant difference in safety between the treatments. In patients with influenza, TCMIs + oseltamivir only partially improve flu symptoms. Overall therapeutic efficacy and safety are inconclusive, based on low to very low certainty of evidence. However, the safety remains uncertain, and TCMI treatments for influenza should be considered with caution. More high-quality studies examining the efficacy and safety of TCMIs are needed. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42021286994.

摘要

作为人类呼吸道感染的一个病因,流感的发病率和死亡率居高不下,带来了巨大的医疗负担和经济负担。中药注射剂(TCMIs)联合奥司他韦(TCMIs + 奥司他韦)是流感的代表性治疗策略,在中国符合临床应用情况。本研究的目的是基于现有证据描述TCMIs + 奥司他韦治疗流感患者的相对疗效和安全性。检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science、中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、维普资讯资源整合服务平台数据库以及中国生物医学文献服务系统,以查找从开始到2021年10月期间以TCMIs + 奥司他韦为流感代表性治疗策略的随机对照试验,无语言限制。两名研究者独立筛选纳入标准、提取数据,并使用相同标准评估偏倚风险。我们对每个结局采用贝叶斯随机方法进行网络荟萃分析,并进行敏感性分析、荟萃回归以及Egger检验和Begg检验以评估结果的可靠性和稳健性。31项试验共2893名参与者符合纳入标准,报告了四种TCMIs + 奥司他韦对比奥司他韦的情况。网络荟萃分析显示,在发热消失时间方面,炎琥宁(YHN)+奥司他韦(MD = -1.7,95% CrI:-2.5至-0.88;SUCRA = 0.89;证据确定性低);在咳嗽消失时间方面,痰热清(TRQ)+奥司他韦(MD = -1.9,95% CrI:-2.8至-1;SUCRA = 0.97;证据确定性低);在有效率方面,喜炎平(XYP)+奥司他韦(OR = 5.9,95% CrI:3.1至11;SUCRA = 0.82;证据确定性极低)比单用奥司他韦更有效,且SUCRA值最佳。基于主要结局的综合SUCRA值,TRQ + 奥司他韦在咳嗽消失时间方面可能更好,而XYP + 奥司他韦和YHN + 奥司他韦在发热消失时间方面可能比其他药物更好。各治疗组之间安全性无显著差异。在流感患者中,TCMIs + 奥司他韦仅部分改善流感症状。基于低至极低的证据确定性,总体治疗效果和安全性尚无定论。然而,安全性仍不确定,流感的中药注射剂治疗应谨慎考虑。需要更多高质量研究来考察TCMIs的疗效和安全性。https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/,标识符CRD42021286994

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18bd/9355026/e46f1fcfb6c5/fphar-13-848770-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验