Muraki Koichiro, Hattori Chikayuki, Ogo Etsuyo, Suefuji Hiroaki, Eto Hidehiro, Tsuji Chiyoko, Miyata Yusaku, Abe Toshi, Chikui Katsuaki, Nakiri Makoto, Igawa Tsukasa, Kakuma Tatsuyuki
Department of Radiology, Kurume University, Japan.
Department of Urology, Kurume University, Japan.
J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2021 Jun;13(3):254-262. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2021.105944. Epub 2021 May 6.
Prostate cancer with median lobe hyperplasia (MLH) is a relative contraindication for permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) because of an increased risk of post-implant dysuria and technical difficulties associated with achieving stability while implanting within the intravesical tissue. We examined treatment outcome, seed migration, and urination disorders after treatment in MLH patients in order to determine to what degree MLH implants could be stabilized.
Between March 2007 and December 2016, 32 patients had MLH identified radiologically on magnetic resonance imaging, and 193 patients did not have MLH (non-MLH). All patients were treated with loose seeds. In this study, seed migration was defined as a seed distant from the target (≥ 1.5 cm) and/or with no dosimetric contribution to the target. The MLH patients were divided into 2 MLH groups of mild (< 10 mm) and severe (≥ 10 mm) MLH by measuring the distance between the posterior transitional zone and the prostatic tissue protruding into the bladder. We retrospectively analyzed seed migration, dose-volume histograms (DVH), and genitourinary toxicity.
MLH was classified as mild in 24 patients and severe in 8. Seed migration occurred in 61 (31.6%) of 193 non-MLH patients and 10 (31.5%) of 32 MLH patients. Implant seed migration and low-dose level of median lobe tended to be high in severe MLH cases. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) peaked one month after implantation, but then resolved slowly and returned to around the pre-treatment level after one year. There were no severe complications.
MLH does not appear to be a strong contraindication for low-dose-rate brachytherapy. However, we found that the seed migration and degree of cold spots tended to be higher in severe MLH cases than in others; therefore, close attention when treating severe MLH cases must be paid.
伴有中叶增生(MLH)的前列腺癌是永久性前列腺近距离放射治疗(PPB)的相对禁忌证,因为植入后排尿困难风险增加,且在膀胱内组织植入时实现稳定性存在技术困难。我们研究了MLH患者治疗后的治疗结果、粒子迁移和排尿障碍,以确定MLH植入物能够稳定到何种程度。
2007年3月至2016年12月期间,32例患者经磁共振成像在影像学上被诊断为MLH,193例患者无MLH(非MLH)。所有患者均接受松散粒子治疗。在本研究中,粒子迁移定义为粒子远离靶区(≥1.5 cm)和/或对靶区无剂量贡献。通过测量后移行区与突入膀胱的前列腺组织之间的距离,将MLH患者分为轻度(<10 mm)和重度(≥10 mm)MLH两组。我们回顾性分析了粒子迁移、剂量体积直方图(DVH)和泌尿生殖系统毒性。
24例患者的MLH为轻度,8例为重度。193例非MLH患者中有61例(31.6%)发生粒子迁移,32例MLH患者中有10例(31.5%)发生粒子迁移。重度MLH病例中植入粒子迁移和中叶低剂量水平往往较高。国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)在植入后1个月达到峰值,但随后缓慢缓解,1年后恢复到治疗前水平左右。无严重并发症。
MLH似乎不是低剂量率近距离放射治疗的强烈禁忌证。然而,我们发现重度MLH病例的粒子迁移和冷区程度往往高于其他病例;因此,治疗重度MLH病例时必须密切关注。