Suppr超能文献

年轻患者的近端腕骨切除术

Proximal Row Carpectomy in Young Patients.

作者信息

Wagner Eric R, Barras Laurel A, Harstad Chelsea, Elhassan Bassem T, Moran Steven L

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2021 Feb 4;11(1). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.19.00054. eCollection 2021 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There continues to be controversy regarding the treatment of early-stage arthritis of the wrist, particularly in young patients, because of the large number of techniques, the poor long-term results for many of these techniques, and the overall paucity of high-level scientific data. Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) and 4-corner arthrodesis (4CA) have been established as the mainstay motion-sparing surgical treatment options in cases of early scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse arthritis. However, there is marked controversy surrounding the best treatment option for younger patients with greater physical demands because of the questionable outcomes associated with these motion-sparing options in such patients. Traditionally, many surgeons prefer 4CA over PRC for young, high-demand patients, in part because studies have suggested that young age and work status as a laborer are important risk factors for worse outcomes following PRC. However, the concern for symptomatic nonunion and potential for radiolunate arthritis in 4CA, as well as the lack of medium to long-term comparative studies in this subset, make this recommendation controversial.

DESCRIPTION

The wrist is accessed via the dorsal approach, creating a retinacular flap and a radially based ligament-sparing capsulotomy. The scaphoid, lunate, and triquetrum are then excised en bloc. The radioscapholunate ligament is protected. The capsule and retinaculum and then repaired.

ALTERNATIVES

Alternatives to PRC include nonoperative treatment, 4CA, capitolunate arthrodesis, posterior and anterior interosseous neurectomies, total wrist arthroplasty, and total wrist arthrodesis.

RATIONALE

A recent study by Wagner et al. compared patients <45 years old who underwent either PRC or 4CA. Overall, PRC and 4CA had similar complication rates, postoperative pain levels, wrist function, and long-term outcomes free of conversion to arthrodesis. Patients who underwent PRC had improved motion and fewer complications, whereas patients who underwent 4CA had slightly lower rates of radiocarpal arthritis. Therefore, in this technique article, we describe PRC for wrist arthritis in patients <45 years old.

摘要

背景

腕关节早期关节炎的治疗仍存在争议,尤其是在年轻患者中,原因在于治疗技术众多、许多技术的长期效果不佳以及高水平科学数据总体匮乏。近端排腕骨切除术(PRC)和四角融合术(4CA)已成为早期舟月骨晚期塌陷和舟骨不愈合晚期塌陷性关节炎病例中保留运动功能的主要手术治疗选择。然而,对于身体需求较高的年轻患者,最佳治疗方案存在显著争议,因为这些保留运动功能的手术方案在这类患者中的疗效存疑。传统上,许多外科医生在年轻、高需求患者中更倾向于选择4CA而非PRC,部分原因是研究表明年轻和劳动者的工作状态是PRC术后预后较差的重要风险因素。然而,4CA存在症状性不愈合和桡月关节炎的风险,且该亚组缺乏中长期比较研究,这使得这一推荐存在争议。

描述

通过背侧入路进入腕关节,制作一个支持带瓣和一个以桡侧为基底的保留韧带的关节囊切开术。然后将舟骨、月骨和三角骨整块切除。保护桡舟月韧带。然后修复关节囊和支持带。

替代方案

PRC的替代方案包括非手术治疗、4CA、头月关节融合术、后和前骨间神经切除术、全腕关节置换术和全腕关节融合术。

原理

Wagner等人最近的一项研究比较了年龄小于45岁接受PRC或4CA的患者。总体而言,PRC和4CA的并发症发生率、术后疼痛水平、腕关节功能以及未转换为关节融合术的长期预后相似。接受PRC的患者活动度改善且并发症较少,而接受4CA的患者桡腕关节炎发生率略低。因此,在这篇技术文章中,我们描述了45岁以下腕关节炎患者的PRC。

相似文献

1
Proximal Row Carpectomy in Young Patients.年轻患者的近端腕骨切除术
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2021 Feb 4;11(1). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.19.00054. eCollection 2021 Jan-Mar.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验