Matsui Akira, Hoteya Shu, Hayasaka Junnosuke, Yamashita Satoshi, Ochiai Yorinari, Suzuki Yugo, Fukuma Yumiko, Okamura Takayuki, Mitsunaga Yutaka, Tanaka Masami, Nomura Kousuke, Dan Nobuhiro, Odagiri Hiroyuki, Kikuchi Daisuke
Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Inflamm Intest Dis. 2021 May;6(2):70-77. doi: 10.1159/000512292. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) have an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Some studies have recently investigated endoscopic resection of UC-associated neoplasia (UCAN), but the indications for endoscopic resection of UCAN remain controversial. This study sought to clarify the problems encountered in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for UCAN.
Seventeen lesions in 12 patients with UCAN (UCAN group) and 913 epithelial lesions in 824 control patients without UC (non-UC group) were evaluated. Both groups underwent ESD between January 2010 and December 2017 at Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. Treatment outcomes of the 2 groups were compared retrospectively.
Univariate analysis showed that the mean tumor size was significantly smaller in the UCAN group than in the non-UC group (25.1 ± 26.7 mm vs. 31.9 ± 19.0; = 0.0023); however, the R0 resection rate was significantly lower in the UCAN group (70.6 vs. 92.9%; = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed a significantly lower negative horizontal margin rate in the UCAN group (odds ratio 11.3, 95% confidence interval 3.588-34.525; = 0.000).
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: ESD for UCAN is associated with a low-negative horizontal margin rate. When performing ESD for UCAN, it is important to evaluate the accuracy of the UCAN demarcation line, especially for flat lesions, using white-light imaging and chromoendoscopy as well as other modalities, including biopsy of surrounding tissues.
溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者患结直肠癌的风险增加。最近一些研究对UC相关肿瘤(UCAN)的内镜下切除进行了调查,但UCAN内镜下切除的指征仍存在争议。本研究旨在阐明UCAN内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)中遇到的问题。
对12例UCAN患者(UCAN组)的17个病变和824例无UC的对照患者(非UC组)的913个上皮病变进行评估。两组均于2010年1月至2017年12月在日本东京虎之门医院接受ESD治疗。对两组的治疗结果进行回顾性比较。
单因素分析显示,UCAN组的平均肿瘤大小显著小于非UC组(25.1±26.7mm对31.9±19.0;P = 0.0023);然而,UCAN组的R0切除率显著较低(70.6%对92.9%;P = 0.001)。多因素分析显示,UCAN组的阴性水平切缘率显著较低(优势比11.3,95%置信区间3.588 - 34.525;P = 0.000)。
讨论/结论:UCAN的ESD与低阴性水平切缘率相关。在对UCAN进行ESD时,使用白光成像、色素内镜以及其他方式(包括对周围组织进行活检)评估UCAN分界线的准确性非常重要,尤其是对于扁平病变。