Pradeep Prachi, Patlewicz Grace, Pearce Robert, Wambaugh John, Wetmore Barbara, Judson Richard
Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Comput Toxicol. 2020 Nov 1;16. doi: 10.1016/j.comtox.2020.100136.
The toxicokinetic (TK) parameters fraction of the chemical unbound to plasma proteins and metabolic clearance are critical for relating exposure and internal dose when building in vitro-based risk assessment models. However, experimental toxicokinetic studies have only been carried out on limited chemicals of environmental interest (~1000 chemicals with TK data relative to tens of thousands of chemicals of interest). This work evaluated the utility of chemical structure information to predict TK parameters in silico; development of cluster-based read-across and quantitative structure-activity relationship models of fraction unbound or fub (regression) and intrinsic clearance or Cl (classification and regression) using a dataset of 1487 chemicals; utilization of predicted TK parameters to estimate uncertainty in steady-state plasma concentration (C); and subsequent in vitro-in vivo extrapolation analyses to derive bioactivity-exposure ratio (BER) plot to compare human oral equivalent doses and exposure predictions using androgen and estrogen receptor activity data for 233 chemicals as an example dataset. The results demonstrate that fub is structurally more predictable than Cl. The model with the highest observed performance for fub had an external test set RMSE/σ=0.62 and R=0.61, for Cl classification had an external test set accuracy = 65.9%, and for intrinsic clearance regression had an external test set RMSE/σ=0.90 and R=0.20. This relatively low performance is in part due to the large uncertainty in the underlying Cl data. We show that C is relatively insensitive to uncertainty in Cl. The models were benchmarked against the ADMET Predictor software. Finally, the BER analysis allowed identification of 14 out of 136 chemicals for further risk assessment demonstrating the utility of these models in aiding risk-based chemical prioritization.
在构建基于体外的风险评估模型时,化学物质未与血浆蛋白结合的分数和代谢清除率等毒代动力学(TK)参数对于关联暴露量和体内剂量至关重要。然而,实验性毒代动力学研究仅针对有限的具有环境意义的化学物质开展(约1000种有TK数据的化学物质,而感兴趣的化学物质有几万种)。本研究评估了化学结构信息在计算机模拟中预测TK参数的效用;使用1487种化学物质的数据集开发基于聚类的跨类别预测模型以及未结合分数或fub(回归)和内在清除率或Cl(分类和回归)的定量构效关系模型;利用预测的TK参数估计稳态血浆浓度(C)的不确定性;随后进行体外-体内外推分析,以得出生物活性-暴露比(BER)图,以233种化学物质的雄激素和雌激素受体活性数据作为示例数据集,比较人体口服等效剂量和暴露预测。结果表明,fub在结构上比Cl更具可预测性。fub观察到的性能最高的模型,其外部测试集的RMSE/σ = 0.62,R = 0.61;Cl分类的外部测试集准确率 = 65.9%;内在清除率回归的外部测试集RMSE/σ = 0.90,R = 0.20。这种相对较低的性能部分归因于基础Cl数据的巨大不确定性。我们表明,C对Cl的不确定性相对不敏感。这些模型以ADMET Predictor软件为基准进行了测试。最后,BER分析允许在136种化学物质中识别出14种进行进一步的风险评估,证明了这些模型在基于风险的化学物质优先级排序中的效用。