Suppr超能文献

“我应该继续学习吗?对年轻人和老年人停止学习的决定的后果。”勘误:Krogulska 等人(2021 年)。

"Should I keep studying? Consequences of a decision to stop learning in young and older adults." Correction to Krogulska et al. (2021).

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 2021 Jun;36(4):543. doi: 10.1037/pag0000616.

Abstract

Reports an error in "Should I keep studying? Consequences of a decision to stop learning in young and older adults" by Aleksandra Krogulska, Karolina Golik, Krystian Barzykowski, Jennifer Cox, Agata Jakubiak and Elizabeth A. Maylor (, 2021[Mar], Vol 36[2], 158-171). In the article (https:// doi.org/10.1037/pag0000594), there was a typographical error in the grant number awarded to Aleksandra Krogulska. The correct grant number is UMO-2016/21/N/HS6/02953. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2021-24143-001.) In situations of cognitive overload, the role of a metacognitive decision to stop learning is of utmost importance. We investigated how young and older adults decide to stop learning as a strategy for maximizing memory performance when they face to-be-learned material exceeding their memory capability. People may decide to stop learning for two main reasons: they experience a growing feeling of disfluency as a learning episode progresses and/or they perceive such a decision to be beneficial for future memory performance. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants studied lists of 50 words. The majority of young and older adults stopped learning in conditions where they were allowed to do so. This decision, counterintuitively, decreased the number of recalled words. Crucially, a similar number of young and older adults stopped the presentation of to-be-remembered material, and both age groups suffered comparable consequences in their memory performance. In Experiments 3a and 3b, participants read an experimental scenario and decided whether they would stop learning based on this description alone. People in different age groups predicted their metacognitive decisions similarly. However, participants' forecasted performance did not reflect the negative influence of these decisions. Regardless of their age, people tend to make a suboptimal decision to stop learning, unaware of its negative consequences. Together, our results suggest that young and older adults can exert metamemory control to similar degrees even though their decisions may not be beneficial for memory performance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

报告了 Aleksandra Krogulska、Karolina Golik、Krystian Barzykowski、Jennifer Cox、Agata Jakubiak 和 Elizabeth A. Maylor 的文章“是否应该继续学习?年轻和年长成年人停止学习的后果”(2021 年 3 月,第 36 卷,第 158-171 页)中的一个错误。在文章(https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000594)中,授予 Aleksandra Krogulska 的资助号码有误。正确的资助号码是 UMO-2016/21/N/HS6/02953。本文的在线版本已更正。(原始文章的摘要如下:在认知超负荷的情况下,元认知决策停止学习的作用至关重要。我们研究了年轻人和老年人如何决定停止学习,作为一种在面临超出记忆能力的待学习材料时最大化记忆表现的策略。人们可能出于两个主要原因决定停止学习:随着学习过程的进行,他们体验到越来越大的不流畅感,或者他们认为这样的决定对未来的记忆表现有益。在实验 1 和 2 中,参与者学习了 50 个单词的列表。大多数年轻人和老年人在允许他们这样做的情况下选择停止学习。这种决策出人意料地减少了回忆单词的数量。至关重要的是,相当数量的年轻人和老年人也停止了呈现待记忆的材料,并且两个年龄组的记忆表现都受到类似的影响。在实验 3a 和 3b 中,参与者阅读了一个实验场景,并根据该描述独自决定是否停止学习。不同年龄组的人对自己的元认知决策进行了类似的预测。然而,参与者的预测表现并不能反映这些决策的负面影响。无论其年龄大小,人们往往会做出不利于学习的次优决策,而没有意识到其负面影响。总之,我们的结果表明,即使他们的决策可能不利于记忆表现,年轻人和老年人都可以进行元记忆控制,达到相似的程度。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验