Suppr超能文献

“老年人在最后通牒博弈中比年轻人更少考虑他人意图,但更多地考虑他人的分配结果”:对 Cho 等人(2020 年)的更正。

"Older adults consider others' intentions less but allocentric outcomes more than young adults during an ultimatum game": Correction to Cho et al. (2020).

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Yonsei University.

Department of Psychology, Korea University.

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 2021 Aug;36(5):677. doi: 10.1037/pag0000619. Epub 2021 Jul 22.

Abstract

Reports an error in "Older adults consider others' intentions less but allocentric outcomes more than young adults during an ultimatum game" by Isu Cho, Hyun-joo Song, Hackjin Kim and Sunhae Sul (, 2020[Nov], Vol 35[7], 974-980). In the original article, there was a typographical error in the grant number awarded to Hyun-joo Song. The correct grant number is NRF-2018S1A3A2075114. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2020-68198-001). The present research investigated age-related differences in other-regarding preferences-the preference for taking others' benefit into account during social decision-making-between young and elderly adults. Young and older Korean adults responded to multiple rounds of a mini-ultimatum game, and the extent to which each individual considered outcome and intention was quantified using economic utility models. We found that older adults, compared to young adults, were less likely to consider others' intentions, while focusing more on others' outcomes. Possible psychological factors underlying our findings, including theory of mind, prosocial values, and decision strategies, are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

报告了一篇名为《在最后通牒博弈中,老年人比年轻人更少考虑他人的意图,但更关注他人的结果》的文章中的错误,作者为 Isu Cho、Hyun-joo Song、Hackjin Kim 和 Sunhae Sul(2020 年 11 月,第 35 卷,第 974-980 页)。在原始文章中,Hyun-joo Song 获得的拨款编号有误。正确的拨款编号为 NRF-2018S1A3A2075114。该文章的在线版本已更正。(原始文章摘要如下)本研究考察了年轻人和老年人在社会决策中考虑他人利益的亲社会偏好——其他关注偏好——的年龄差异。年轻和年长的韩国成年人对多轮迷你最后通牒游戏做出反应,使用经济效用模型量化每个人考虑结果和意图的程度。我们发现,与年轻人相比,老年人不太可能考虑他人的意图,而更关注他人的结果。讨论了我们发现的可能的心理因素,包括心理理论、亲社会价值观和决策策略。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验