Department of Psychology, Yonsei University.
Department of Psychology, Korea University.
Psychol Aging. 2021 Aug;36(5):677. doi: 10.1037/pag0000619. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
Reports an error in "Older adults consider others' intentions less but allocentric outcomes more than young adults during an ultimatum game" by Isu Cho, Hyun-joo Song, Hackjin Kim and Sunhae Sul (, 2020[Nov], Vol 35[7], 974-980). In the original article, there was a typographical error in the grant number awarded to Hyun-joo Song. The correct grant number is NRF-2018S1A3A2075114. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2020-68198-001). The present research investigated age-related differences in other-regarding preferences-the preference for taking others' benefit into account during social decision-making-between young and elderly adults. Young and older Korean adults responded to multiple rounds of a mini-ultimatum game, and the extent to which each individual considered outcome and intention was quantified using economic utility models. We found that older adults, compared to young adults, were less likely to consider others' intentions, while focusing more on others' outcomes. Possible psychological factors underlying our findings, including theory of mind, prosocial values, and decision strategies, are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
报告了一篇名为《在最后通牒博弈中,老年人比年轻人更少考虑他人的意图,但更关注他人的结果》的文章中的错误,作者为 Isu Cho、Hyun-joo Song、Hackjin Kim 和 Sunhae Sul(2020 年 11 月,第 35 卷,第 974-980 页)。在原始文章中,Hyun-joo Song 获得的拨款编号有误。正确的拨款编号为 NRF-2018S1A3A2075114。该文章的在线版本已更正。(原始文章摘要如下)本研究考察了年轻人和老年人在社会决策中考虑他人利益的亲社会偏好——其他关注偏好——的年龄差异。年轻和年长的韩国成年人对多轮迷你最后通牒游戏做出反应,使用经济效用模型量化每个人考虑结果和意图的程度。我们发现,与年轻人相比,老年人不太可能考虑他人的意图,而更关注他人的结果。讨论了我们发现的可能的心理因素,包括心理理论、亲社会价值观和决策策略。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。