Van Beek Marta, Swerlick Robert A, Mathes Barbara, Reeder Margo J, Kaye Toni, Aninos Arik, Fitzgerald Matthew E, Etkin Caryn D, Jacobs Jeffrey P
University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022 Feb;86(2):394-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.06.024. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
The utility of any database or registry depends on the completeness and accuracy of the data it contains. This report documents the validity of data elements within DataDerm, the clinical registry database of the American Academy of Dermatology. An external audit of DataDerm, performed by a third-party vendor, involved the manual review of 1098 individual patient charts from calendar year 2018 from 8 different dermatology practices that used 4 different electronic health records. At each site, 142 discrete data fields were assessed, comparing the data within DataDerm to the source data within the electronic health record. Audited data included 3 domains of data elements (diagnoses, medications, and procedures) and a performance measure ("Biopsy Reporting Time-Clinician to Patient"), which is 1 of several measures used by DataDerm as a Qualified Clinical Data Registry. Overall completeness of data was 95.3%, with a range among practices of 90.6% to 98.5%. Overall accuracy of data was 89.8%, with a range of accuracy among practices of 81.2% to 94.1%. These levels of completeness and accuracy exceed the rates in the literature for registries that are based on data that is extracted from electronic health records; and therefore, this audit validates the excellent quality of data in DataDerm.
任何数据库或登记处的效用都取决于其所包含数据的完整性和准确性。本报告记录了美国皮肤科协会临床登记数据库DataDerm中数据元素的有效性。由第三方供应商对DataDerm进行的外部审计,涉及对2018日历年来自8家不同皮肤科诊所、使用4种不同电子健康记录的1098份个体患者病历进行人工审查。在每个站点,评估了142个离散数据字段,将DataDerm中的数据与电子健康记录中的源数据进行比较。审计数据包括3个数据元素领域(诊断、药物和程序)以及一项绩效指标(“活检报告时间——从医生到患者”),这是DataDerm作为合格临床数据登记处使用的多项指标之一。数据的总体完整性为95.3%,各诊所之间的范围为90.6%至98.5%。数据的总体准确性为89.8%,各诊所的准确性范围为81.2%至94.1%。这些完整性和准确性水平超过了基于从电子健康记录中提取的数据的登记处的文献报道率;因此,本次审计验证了DataDerm中数据的卓越质量。