Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Pharmacy, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021 Oct;46(5):1387-1394. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13467. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
Patients on haemodialysis (HD) are at increased risk of both bleeding and thrombotic events, due to comorbidities and nature of dialysis treatment. However, there is a lack of research on evidence-based treatment strategies and prescribing patterns for antithrombotic therapies (ATT) in this population. To characterize ATT use and its main indications in an outpatient HD unit.
A single-centre retrospective chart review was conducted in a Toronto outpatient HD unit (n = 329). Medical histories, number of ATTs and corresponding indications were collected from adult patients prescribed at least one ATT from 1 October 2019 to 31 December 2019, inclusive.
Of 329 patients in the unit, a total of 135 (41%) patients were on at least one ATT. Of these 135 patients, 80% were on monotherapy (55% antiplatelet, 25.1% anticoagulant), 12.6% were on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), and 7.4% were on a antiplatelet and anticoagulant combination. Primary indications for ATT in our cohort were coronary artery disease (CAD; 55%), atrial fibrillation (18.5%) and venous thromboembolism (VTE; 17%). Described ATT use was in-line with current clinical guidelines. Monotherapy was primarily used in our HD cohort, whereas few patients were on dual therapy. Low-dose aspirin was the most common antiplatelet prescribed for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events. Warfarin monotherapy was primarily indicated for VTE, and DAPT aspirin/clopidogrel was the most commonly prescribed for CAD.
Our characterization of ATT use in this HD cohort demonstrates that ATT is often prescribed for a number of different CVD reasons. Overlapping and confounding indications for prescribing ATTs, lack of randomized controlled trials and unclear clinical guidelines mean that individualized risk-benefit assessments for ATT use are still needed to provide care for these high-risk patients. More research to address the safety and efficacy of ATTs is warranted to develop more robust evidence-based treatment guidelines for the HD population.
由于合并症和透析治疗的性质,接受血液透析 (HD) 的患者有出血和血栓形成事件的风险增加。然而,对于该人群的抗血栓治疗 (ATT) 的循证治疗策略和处方模式,缺乏研究。描述门诊 HD 病房中 ATT 的使用情况及其主要适应证。
在多伦多门诊 HD 病房进行了一项单中心回顾性图表审查(n=329)。从 2019 年 10 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间,从至少开一种 ATT 的成年患者的病历中收集了 ATT 的数量及其相应的适应证。
在该病房的 329 名患者中,共有 135 名(41%)患者至少使用了一种 ATT。在这 135 名患者中,80%接受单一治疗(55%抗血小板,25.1%抗凝),12.6%接受双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT),7.4%接受抗血小板和抗凝联合治疗。我们队列中 ATT 的主要适应证是冠状动脉疾病 (CAD;55%)、心房颤动 (18.5%)和静脉血栓栓塞 (VTE;17%)。描述的 ATT 使用与当前的临床指南一致。在我们的 HD 队列中,主要使用单一疗法,而很少有患者使用双重治疗。小剂量阿司匹林是用于二级预防心血管事件的最常见抗血小板药物。华法林单药主要用于 VTE,DAPT 阿司匹林/氯吡格雷是 CAD 最常开的处方。
我们对该 HD 队列中 ATT 使用情况的描述表明,ATT 通常因多种不同的 CVD 原因而开具。重叠和混淆的 ATT 适应证、缺乏随机对照试验和不明确的临床指南意味着仍需要进行 ATT 使用的个体化风险效益评估,以提供对这些高危患者的治疗。需要更多的研究来解决 ATT 的安全性和有效性问题,以便为 HD 人群制定更有力的循证治疗指南。