Suppr超能文献

在门诊血液透析单位使用抗血栓治疗的回顾性研究。

A retrospective study of antithrombotic therapy use in an outpatient haemodialysis unit.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Pharmacy, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021 Oct;46(5):1387-1394. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13467. Epub 2021 Jun 15.

Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Patients on haemodialysis (HD) are at increased risk of both bleeding and thrombotic events, due to comorbidities and nature of dialysis treatment. However, there is a lack of research on evidence-based treatment strategies and prescribing patterns for antithrombotic therapies (ATT) in this population. To characterize ATT use and its main indications in an outpatient HD unit.

METHODS

A single-centre retrospective chart review was conducted in a Toronto outpatient HD unit (n = 329). Medical histories, number of ATTs and corresponding indications were collected from adult patients prescribed at least one ATT from 1 October 2019 to 31 December 2019, inclusive.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Of 329 patients in the unit, a total of 135 (41%) patients were on at least one ATT. Of these 135 patients, 80% were on monotherapy (55% antiplatelet, 25.1% anticoagulant), 12.6% were on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), and 7.4% were on a antiplatelet and anticoagulant combination. Primary indications for ATT in our cohort were coronary artery disease (CAD; 55%), atrial fibrillation (18.5%) and venous thromboembolism (VTE; 17%). Described ATT use was in-line with current clinical guidelines. Monotherapy was primarily used in our HD cohort, whereas few patients were on dual therapy. Low-dose aspirin was the most common antiplatelet prescribed for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events. Warfarin monotherapy was primarily indicated for VTE, and DAPT aspirin/clopidogrel was the most commonly prescribed for CAD.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Our characterization of ATT use in this HD cohort demonstrates that ATT is often prescribed for a number of different CVD reasons. Overlapping and confounding indications for prescribing ATTs, lack of randomized controlled trials and unclear clinical guidelines mean that individualized risk-benefit assessments for ATT use are still needed to provide care for these high-risk patients. More research to address the safety and efficacy of ATTs is warranted to develop more robust evidence-based treatment guidelines for the HD population.

摘要

已知和目的

由于合并症和透析治疗的性质,接受血液透析 (HD) 的患者有出血和血栓形成事件的风险增加。然而,对于该人群的抗血栓治疗 (ATT) 的循证治疗策略和处方模式,缺乏研究。描述门诊 HD 病房中 ATT 的使用情况及其主要适应证。

方法

在多伦多门诊 HD 病房进行了一项单中心回顾性图表审查(n=329)。从 2019 年 10 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间,从至少开一种 ATT 的成年患者的病历中收集了 ATT 的数量及其相应的适应证。

结果和讨论

在该病房的 329 名患者中,共有 135 名(41%)患者至少使用了一种 ATT。在这 135 名患者中,80%接受单一治疗(55%抗血小板,25.1%抗凝),12.6%接受双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT),7.4%接受抗血小板和抗凝联合治疗。我们队列中 ATT 的主要适应证是冠状动脉疾病 (CAD;55%)、心房颤动 (18.5%)和静脉血栓栓塞 (VTE;17%)。描述的 ATT 使用与当前的临床指南一致。在我们的 HD 队列中,主要使用单一疗法,而很少有患者使用双重治疗。小剂量阿司匹林是用于二级预防心血管事件的最常见抗血小板药物。华法林单药主要用于 VTE,DAPT 阿司匹林/氯吡格雷是 CAD 最常开的处方。

创新与结论

我们对该 HD 队列中 ATT 使用情况的描述表明,ATT 通常因多种不同的 CVD 原因而开具。重叠和混淆的 ATT 适应证、缺乏随机对照试验和不明确的临床指南意味着仍需要进行 ATT 使用的个体化风险效益评估,以提供对这些高危患者的治疗。需要更多的研究来解决 ATT 的安全性和有效性问题,以便为 HD 人群制定更有力的循证治疗指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验