Centre for Research and Development of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Srinagarind Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Microb Drug Resist. 2021 Dec;27(12):1685-1691. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2020.0613. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
We modified rapid polymyxin Nordmann-Poirel (RPNP) test, called rapid colistin disk elution (RCDE) test, for detecting colistin resistance in Gram-negative bacilli and evaluated its performance compared with colistin broth disk elution (CBDE) test recommended by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The RCDE test was performed by using a 10-μg colistin disk in 2.7 mL volume (final colistin concentration of 3.7 μg/mL) of either cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth or phenol red broth base media with bacterial inoculum of 1-μL loop, and 1-4 and 16-20 hr incubation for Enterobacteriaceae and isolates, respectively. Both tests were evaluated in 236 Enterobacteriaceae and 49 isolates using broth microdilution as reference method. Among the Enterobacteriaceae isolates, categorical agreement and very major error (VME or false intermediate susceptibility) rate were 98.3% and 5.4%, respectively, for the RCDE test, compared with 97.9% and 7.1%, respectively, for the CBDE test. Both tests had major error (ME or false resistance) rate of 0.6%. For the isolates, the RCDE and CBDE tests gave high VME rates of 8.3% and 16.7%, respectively. The RCDE test showed good performance comparable with the CBDE test but is cheaper and more rapid (3 hr) and convenient, thus suggesting as an alternative for detecting colistin resistance among Enterobacteriaceae in low-income countries.
我们修改了快速多黏菌素 Nordmann-Poirel(RPNP)检测试验,称之为快速黏菌素药敏纸片洗脱试验(RCDE),用于检测革兰氏阴性菌中的黏菌素耐药性,并将其与临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)推荐的黏菌素肉汤药敏纸片洗脱试验(CBDE)进行了比较。RCDE 试验通过使用阳离子调整 Mueller-Hinton 肉汤或酚红肉汤基础培养基中的 10μg 黏菌素药敏纸片,体积为 2.7mL(最终黏菌素浓度为 3.7μg/mL),细菌接种物为 1μL 环,分别孵育 1-4 小时和 16-20 小时,用于肠杆菌科和非发酵菌。使用肉汤微量稀释法作为参考方法,对 236 株肠杆菌科和 49 株非发酵菌进行了两项试验评估。在肠杆菌科分离株中,RCDE 试验的分类一致性和非常大的错误(VME 或假中介敏感性)率分别为 98.3%和 5.4%,而 CBDE 试验分别为 97.9%和 7.1%。两种试验的主要错误(ME 或假耐药性)率均为 0.6%。对于非发酵菌,RCDE 和 CBDE 试验的 VME 率分别为 8.3%和 16.7%。RCDE 试验与 CBDE 试验具有良好的性能,但更便宜、更快(3 小时)且更方便,因此,建议将其作为在低收入国家检测肠杆菌科中黏菌素耐药性的替代方法。