• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用 EEG 对人工语言学习任务中的语义进行解码。

Using EEG to decode semantics during an artificial language learning task.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.

Centre for Biomedical Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.

出版信息

Brain Behav. 2021 Aug;11(8):e2234. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2234. Epub 2021 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1002/brb3.2234
PMID:34129727
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8413773/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As we learn a new nonnative language (L2), we begin to build a new map of concepts onto orthographic representations. Eventually, L2 can conjure as rich a semantic representation as our native language (L1). However, the neural processes for mapping a new orthographic representation to a familiar meaning are not well understood or characterized.

METHODS

Using electroencephalography and an artificial language that maps symbols to English words, we show that it is possible to use machine learning models to detect a newly formed semantic mapping as it is acquired.

RESULTS

Through a trial-by-trial analysis, we show that we can detect when a new semantic mapping is formed. Our results show that, like word meaning representations evoked by a L1, the localization of the newly formed neural representations is highly distributed, but the representation may emerge more slowly after the onset of the symbol. Furthermore, our mapping of word meanings to symbols removes the confound of the semantics to the visual characteristics of the stimulus, a confound that has been difficult to disentangle previously.

CONCLUSION

We have shown that the L1 semantic representation conjured by a newly acquired L2 word can be detected using decoding techniques, and we give the first characterization of the emergence of that mapping. Our work opens up new possibilities for the study of semantic representations during L2 learning.

摘要

背景

当我们学习一门新的外语(L2)时,我们开始在拼写上建立一个新的概念图。最终,L2 可以像我们的母语(L1)一样唤起丰富的语义表达。然而,将新的拼写表示映射到熟悉的含义的神经过程还没有得到很好的理解或描述。

方法

我们使用脑电图和一种将符号映射到英语单词的人工语言,表明可以使用机器学习模型来检测新形成的语义映射的习得情况。

结果

通过逐次分析,我们表明我们可以检测到新的语义映射何时形成。我们的结果表明,就像由 L1 唤起的单词意义表示一样,新形成的神经表示的定位是高度分布式的,但在符号出现后可能会出现得更慢。此外,我们将单词的意义映射到符号上,消除了刺激的视觉特征与语义之间的混淆,这是以前很难解决的一个混淆。

结论

我们已经表明,使用解码技术可以检测到新习得的 L2 单词唤起的 L1 语义表示,并且我们给出了该映射出现的第一个特征描述。我们的工作为研究 L2 学习期间的语义表示开辟了新的可能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a82/8413773/d8ae57ab773f/BRB3-11-e2234-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a82/8413773/4772b57c1897/BRB3-11-e2234-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a82/8413773/27485129b3ef/BRB3-11-e2234-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a82/8413773/994af933d268/BRB3-11-e2234-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a82/8413773/875be694db17/BRB3-11-e2234-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a82/8413773/d179371d05db/BRB3-11-e2234-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a82/8413773/d8ae57ab773f/BRB3-11-e2234-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a82/8413773/4772b57c1897/BRB3-11-e2234-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a82/8413773/27485129b3ef/BRB3-11-e2234-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a82/8413773/994af933d268/BRB3-11-e2234-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a82/8413773/875be694db17/BRB3-11-e2234-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a82/8413773/d179371d05db/BRB3-11-e2234-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a82/8413773/d8ae57ab773f/BRB3-11-e2234-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Using EEG to decode semantics during an artificial language learning task.利用 EEG 对人工语言学习任务中的语义进行解码。
Brain Behav. 2021 Aug;11(8):e2234. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2234. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
2
The impact of learning new meaning on the previously learned meaning of L2 ambiguous words: The role of semantic similarity.学习新意义对二语歧义词汇先前习得意义的影响:语义相似性的作用。
Psychophysiology. 2022 Apr;59(4):e13992. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13992. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
3
Word learning in two languages: Neural overlap and representational differences.双语词汇学习:神经重叠与表象差异。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Jan 8;150:107703. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107703. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
4
Confusing similar words: ERP correlates of lexical-semantic processing in first language attrition and late second language acquisition.混淆相似词汇:第一语言损耗和第二语言晚期习得中词汇语义加工的事件相关电位关联
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Dec;93(Pt A):200-217. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
5
Neural overlap of L1 and L2 semantic representations in speech: A decoding approach.母语和二语语义表示在言语中的神经重叠:一种解码方法。
Neuroimage. 2017 Nov 15;162:106-116. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.082. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
6
ERP measures of auditory word repetition and translation priming in bilinguals.双语者听觉单词重复与翻译启动的事件相关电位测量
Brain Res. 2006 Dec 13;1125(1):116-31. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.10.002. Epub 2006 Nov 20.
7
Learning new meanings for known L2 words: Long-term semantic representation is updated to integrate new information after consolidation.学习已知第二语言词汇的新含义:长期语义表征在巩固后会更新以整合新信息。
Psychophysiology. 2023 May;60(5):e14228. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14228. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
8
Semantic and translation priming from a first language to a second and back: Making sense of the findings.从第一语言到第二语言再返回的语义与翻译启动:理解研究结果
Mem Cognit. 2009 Jul;37(5):569-86. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.5.569.
9
Photograph method fosters direct access to second-language word meaning: Direct evidence from a word-picture matching task.摄影法促进对二语词义的直接接触:来自词汇-图片匹配任务的直接证据。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2021 Sep;39(3):407-423. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12375. Epub 2021 May 5.
10
Semantic Ambiguity Effects in L2 Word Recognition.二语词汇识别中的语义歧义效应
J Psycholinguist Res. 2018 Jun;47(3):523-536. doi: 10.1007/s10936-017-9542-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Brain-computer interfaces and human factors: the role of language and cultural differences-Still a missing gap?脑机接口与人为因素:语言和文化差异的作用——仍是一个缺失的空白?
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Apr 11;18:1305445. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1305445. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
The ERP, frequency, and time-frequency correlates of feedback processing: Insights from a large sample study.反馈处理的事件相关电位、频率及时间频率相关性:来自一项大样本研究的见解
Psychophysiology. 2021 Feb;58(2):e13722. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13722. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
2
The lexical semantics of adjective-noun phrases in the human brain.形容词-名词短语的词汇语义在人类大脑中的体现。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Oct 15;40(15):4457-4469. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24714. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
3
Toward a universal decoder of linguistic meaning from brain activation.
迈向基于大脑激活的语言意义通用解码器。
Nat Commun. 2018 Mar 6;9(1):963. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03068-4.
4
The application of reward learning in the real world: Changes in the reward positivity amplitude reflect learning in a medical education context.奖励学习在现实世界中的应用:奖励正波幅值的变化反映了医学教育背景下的学习。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2018 Oct;132(Pt B):236-242. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
5
Extrapolating human judgments from skip-gram vector representations of word meaning.从词意的跳字模型向量表示中推断人类判断
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Aug;70(8):1603-1619. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1195417. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
6
The principals of meaning: Extracting semantic dimensions from co-occurrence models of semantics.意义的原则:从语义共现模型中提取语义维度。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Dec;23(6):1744-1756. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1053-2.
7
Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex.自然语言揭示了覆盖人类大脑皮层的语义图谱。
Nature. 2016 Apr 28;532(7600):453-8. doi: 10.1038/nature17637.
8
Simultaneously uncovering the patterns of brain regions involved in different story reading subprocesses.同时揭示参与不同故事阅读子过程的脑区模式。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 26;9(11):e112575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112575. eCollection 2014.
9
The reward positivity: from basic research on reward to a biomarker for depression.奖励积极反应:从奖励的基础研究到抑郁症的生物标志物
Psychophysiology. 2015 Apr;52(4):449-59. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12370. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
10
How we learn to make decisions: rapid propagation of reinforcement learning prediction errors in humans.我们如何学习做决策:强化学习预测错误在人类中的快速传播。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Mar;26(3):635-44. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00509. Epub 2013 Oct 29.