Dahiya Garima, Wetzel Adam, Kyvernitakis Andreas, Gevenosky Loretta, Williams Ronald, Shah Moneal, Farah Victor, Doyle Mark, Biederman Robert Ww
Departments of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Radiology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Aug;44(8):1312-1319. doi: 10.1111/pace.14298. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have historically restricted the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to the potential clinical and configurational risks associated with electromagnetic interference. In this study, the authors investigated the impact of MRI on the functional integrity of non-conditional CIEDs and their clinical correlates.
In this prospective, observational single-center study, we enrolled patients undergoing MRI over a 5-year period. Prior to assessing the impact of MRI on CIEDs, we performed interrogations in sequential duplication to assess the intrinsic variability of devices. Subsequently, we performed interrogations immediately after MRI, and monitored changes in device parameters and clinical events.
We completed 492 MRI studies, 58% in patients with permanent pacemakers (PPMs) and 42% with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Subsequent MRI exposures occurred in 15% encounters. Accounting for intrinsic variability in CIED leads, there were no significant changes in RA, RV, or LV parameters after MRI, regardless of the region imaged (thoracic vs. non-thoracic), type of CIED (PPMs vs. ICDs) and among those with serial MRIs. When ranked for % change pre- to post-MRI, the majority of RA, RV, and LV metrics for thresholds, sensing, and impedance conformed to ≤20% change from baseline. No significant clinical adverse cardiac events or effect on device microcircuitry occurred during the study.
Incorporating a novel reproducibility tactic, there were neither clinically meaningful device parameter changes nor adverse clinical events during or following MRIs, suggesting the effects of MRI on non-conditional CIED integrity are far less than previously perceived.
由于与电磁干扰相关的潜在临床和结构风险,心血管植入式电子设备(CIED)在历史上一直限制了磁共振成像(MRI)的使用。在本研究中,作者调查了MRI对无条件CIED功能完整性及其临床相关性的影响。
在这项前瞻性、观察性单中心研究中,我们纳入了在5年期间接受MRI检查的患者。在评估MRI对CIED的影响之前,我们进行了连续重复的问询,以评估设备的内在变异性。随后,我们在MRI检查后立即进行问询,并监测设备参数和临床事件的变化。
我们完成了492项MRI研究,其中58%的患者植入了永久性起搏器(PPM),42%的患者植入了植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)。15%的检查中发生了后续MRI暴露。考虑到CIED导线的内在变异性,MRI检查后,右心房(RA)、右心室(RV)或左心室(LV)参数均无显著变化,无论成像区域(胸部与非胸部)、CIED类型(PPM与ICD)以及接受连续MRI检查的患者如何。当按MRI前后的变化百分比进行排序时,RA、RV和LV的大多数阈值、感知和阻抗指标与基线相比变化≤20%。在研究期间,未发生显著的临床不良心脏事件,也未对设备微电路产生影响。
采用一种新的可重复性策略,在MRI检查期间及之后,既没有发生具有临床意义的设备参数变化,也没有出现不良临床事件,这表明MRI对无条件CIED完整性的影响远小于此前的认知。